It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by bsbray11
2. Bright white flashes were observed in the WTC collapses, and can be found in both witness testimonies and some high-quality video clips. "Debunkers" usually suggest these were caused by light reflecting off of aliminum (though much would have been in shadow -- no sun to reflect), or electrical phenomena (an idea that also has problems), but nonetheless flashes were observed. I can get you more information if you'd like.
3. Cutter charges can be initiated from any point in a building, and then subsequently go off in whatever order they are programmed to.
Now, one question we need to ask as, is, what are these new "freedom" towers really supposed to symbolize? Has this project taken off yet? I haven't heard about it in a while. The destuction of these buildings seems to mean something. The surrounding area was relatively intact with 3 towers completely demolished in the middle. This seems like a plan to destroy the 3 towers and nothing else. I mean if the plan were as simple as to "kill a bunch of people" missels and bombs would have accomplished that pretty nicely. The job is too neat, so, is there a big overall plan?
Originally posted by esdad71
Victims of a radical religious group who are not finished. It is a beacon of the World economy, and they wanted to finish what they started in 93. If this was a plan to destroy 3 buildings, what is your explanation for the Pentagon and 93? Just use missles and bombs huh? Like this is normal in the US? man.....
Originally posted by LeftBehind
Really? So I suppose they could have demolished the Kingdome by first starting in the middle and then setting off charges up and down the building to have a middle-out demolition?
Where is your evidence that cutter charges can just be set off in any order? It seems to me that a lot of planning and prep work goes into these things, and that there is a good reason that they are timed the way they are.
It certainly would not work to set one off at a time randomly, so while it is true that they can be programmed to go off in any order, they usually set them off in a logical sequence and drop the building base first.
Subject: Re: Your Website
Thank you for your letter. We welcome and appreciate all reasoned
dialog on this subject. Here are our generalized comments:
1. We are aware of Mr. Romero and Mr. Jones statements, however they
both contain critical inaccuracies central to the explo-demo argument.
I would also question whether either has extensive experience working
in the explo-demo field.
2. Mr. Loizeaux's false and self-serving statements are designed to
market his company, and one would be wise to question anything he
says. He does not have a reputable standing in the industry.
Originally posted by Masisoar
Alabama, ask yourself:
A) Sources for the molten steel in the basements of World Trade Centers 1, 2 AND 7 after the collapses.
B) The loss of angular momentum in World Trade Center 2, resulting in symmetrical destruction of the tower.
C) How the inner core gave out simultaneously with the rest of the building when it wasn't even severely damaged minus 4-5 columns per tower out of 47.
D) Where are the pictures of the buckling columns that compromised the structural integrity of the World Trade Centers.
Just to start.
Originally posted by Ezekiel
An airplane loaded with fuel hit the side of a building. Then exploded.
Just stop for a moment and really think hard about the kind of structural damage that would have done to the buildings framework.
Originally posted by esdad71
Can you answer the how of the 4 questions you posted? If you are asking them you must have a point of view.
1. What do you think the pools of metal were from?
2. How and where is momentum lost?
3. What is severly damaged then?
4. as far as this one, there are tapes that show it...
this will help the answers I can give. Thanks.