It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by marg6043
Muaddib
Nothing that you have posted is new is the same propaganda use by the government you cherish and revere so much to justified another of his very good agendas of making the middle east accessible to his private interest.
...........
Ahmadinejad was a senior officer in the Special Brigade of the Revolutionary Guards, stationed at Ramazan Garrison near Kermanshah in western Iran. This was the headquarters of the Revolutionary Guards’ "Extra-territorial Operations" -- mounting attacks beyond Iran’s borders. His work in the Revolutionary Guards was related to suppression of dissidents in Iran and abroad. He personally participated in covert operations around the Iraqi city of Kirkuk.
With the formation of the elite Qods (Jerusalem) Force of the IRGC, Ahmadinejad became one of its senior commanders. He directed assassinations in the Middle East and Europe, including the assassination of Iranian Kurdish leader Abdorrahman Qassemlou, who was shot dead by senior officers of the Revolutionary Guards in a Vienna flat in July 1989. Ahmadinejad was a key planner of the attack. He was reported to have been involved in planning an attempt on the life of Salman Rushdie.
Soon after his election Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said that the ultimate goal of Iran's foreign policy is nothing less than "a government for the world" under the Muslim leadership of the Mahdi. "The United States is in its last death throes, in the sunset of its power destined to be superceded by the sunrise of the Islamic Republic and its global revolution,” he stated. The geopolitical dominance of the Middle East, he continued, is the incontestable right of the Iranian nation.
Old policy, new fears
Ahmadinejad's comments about Israel are nothing new. But the international outrage reflects concerns about where Iran's nucler program may be heading.
Originally posted by golemina
If the Administration had any credibility about taking down states that support terrorism, we would have take Iran to task a long time ago...
Originally posted by MuaddibMarg, I can say with certainty that if you had a neighbor close to you and that neighbor kept yelling threats at you to kill you and your entire family
Originally posted by Muaddib
Marg, again, you are stating "your opinion",
Originally posted by Jamuhn
This is not an apt analogy. It would be more appropriate to state that family A appropriated family B's land. Then family C, D, E, etc. of family B found fault in family A and they all fought over whos land it was.
Israel was not always there, let's not forget that. It doesn't make the killing of civilians in Israel OK, but neither is Israel some innocent family without fault.
Originally posted by Muaddib
The fact is that Israel exists as a nation, they accepted the partition agreement, what we call now "Palestinians" did not accep the agreement, hence not having a country.
Originally posted by Muaddib
and Palestine was never and it is not even now a country....it was a region where many people lived in, including Jewish people, despite some wanting to hide that part of history....
If you are so willing to give Israel away because Arab people were in control of the area for a while.
Golemina,
Originally posted by golemina
> intimidation is not allow in the boards.
Originally posted by marg6043
You know what is the most amazing thing? Jamuhn, that people truly believe that the struggles in the Middle East are the result of 9/11 and that is why US is involve in that area.
Originally posted by marg6043Funny that US politician has been trying to shape the Middle Eastern nations policies and governments since the British Empire left the area.
Originally posted by marg6043Avoiding historical facts is the best way to keep the American population been fed on propaganda so the agendas behind the war on terror and the evilness of some middle eastern nations can be accepted as something that Is the fault of the people in the middle east and not of the west.
Originally posted by marg6043In this way people is geared to believe no in the reasons as why is Political violence against the west but as why the west if in a moral fight against evil regimes.
I think 70 years of broken policies toward the Arabs nations in the Middle East is enough to turn anger into violence.
Originally posted by marg6043Our political leaders through the years have shown that it holds no respect to the people of the area.
Originally posted by marg6043Taking sides whenever if feels that is an advantage to their political standing in the world and bringing our nation with it.
U.S. alliances with Iraq to counter Iran and then with Iran and Syria to counter Iraq, will render any population in a state of completely opposition to what our political leaders has to offer.
For 45 years this type of behavior has been part of the US politician’s strategy in the Middle East and then we are horrified how terrorism has come to the point of what is today.
Darn it took 70 years to get to this point!!!!!! Any surprises?
People don’t get it, the same governments that our political leaders favor in the Middle East will no longer be friends once the political strategies of our governments change.
We no only support feudal monarchies but also autocratic governments as long as the needs of our government’s agendas for the moments are fulfilled.
Originally posted by marg6043
Pyros
You post shows the true nature of a totalitarian governments believes when it comes to the rest of the world.
Only one nation on top of one world.
Hail to the Bush administration and its definition of peace and demcracy for the world.