It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Israel is carefully watching the world's reaction to Iran's continued refusal to suspend uranium enrichment, with some high-level officials arguing it is now clear that when it comes to stopping Iran, Israel "may have to go it alone," The Jerusalem Post has learned.
Originally posted by bokinsmowl
is it possible this is an underlying tactic to pull the US into the war? even to the point that this plan could have been constructed by the US Gov't? Up until now we've been fighting a proxy war, but this sounds like the big step that will get us involved. i truly would like to see israel get their butt's handed to them for being over zealous, but im not prepared to back a US entry into that hell hole.
Edited for language...sorry
[edit on 8/24/2006 by bokinsmowl]
Originally posted by super70
Iran's intent is to acquire a nuclear weapon to destroy Israel. Isn't that pretty much what the Iranian president says he wants, "Israel wiped off the face of the Earth?" There is a very good reason why 6 major powers are working tirelessly to negotiate with Iran to cease the enrichment process it is working at break-neck speed to amass.
LINK: Why hide this then?
Do you really think Iran is going through all this trouble and spending billions for "peaceful energy needs." Iran sits on one of the largest resevoirs of oil on the Earth, it doesnt need this energy. And yet it's people live in virtual poverty. They have been offered this energy for free if they stop the enrichment, they declined.
Some have said Israel had trouble in Lebanon so how could they possibly take on Iran? Israel didn't drop a nuke on Lebanon. Israel is running out of time to strike Iran, if they wait until Iran also has the bomb, that window of opportunity will be closed and its 'game over.'
I think that Israel feels like that if Iran wants a nuke so bad, they will give them one, but Iran will have to catch it from 30,000 feet. Better get out your sunblock.
[edit on 24-8-2006 by super70]
I think that isreal would not be able to defeat iran. Unless another allie steps in. If this is the case it will be world war III .
Originally posted by R3KR
I think that isreal would not be able to defeat iran. Unless another allie steps in. If this is the case it will be world war III .
Iran's intent is to acquire a nuclear weapon to destroy Israel. Isn't that pretty much what the Iranian president says he wants, "Israel wiped off the face of the Earth?" There is a very good reason why 6 major powers are working tirelessly to negotiate with Iran to cease the enrichment process it is working at break-neck speed to amass.
Do you really think Iran is going through all this trouble and spending billions for "peaceful energy needs." Iran sits on one of the largest resevoirs of oil on the Earth, it doesnt need this energy. And yet it's people live in virtual poverty. They have been offered this energy for free if they stop the enrichment, they declined.
The Iranian people suffer for the sins of their leaders just like the rest of us. I think dropping nukes on Iran would be a great tragedy - punishing a whole bunch of innocent Persians for the politically-expedient rhetoric of a select, powerful few.
The oil isn't going to last forever. When it runs out, or becomes unprofitable to extract, Iran will be in a bit of a pickle. It will either have to produce its own energy, or it will have to rely on outsiders for its survival.
Originally posted by nightbreid
I can't see how Israel could go it alone without our help. Maybe an air campaign would be sufficient enough to slow down Iran's nuclear ambitions. But what of the repercussions? Iran has land, sea, and air military capabilities as well as Russia and China in their corner. And we can't forget the rest of their Muslim allies.
Originally posted by xmotex
Iran's goal with it's nuclear program is largely regional prestige and gaining popular support.
They see themselves as a natural great power in the region, they see nuclear technology as the key to underlining this fact. It's also politically very popular in Iran, even among segments of the population that have no use for the theocracy. Never underestimate the power of national pride as a motivator, or as a political tool.
As for the much-promoted "threat to Israel", let's face it: even if they build the bomb, they still have no way of neutralizing Israel's ability to retaliate. Israel has Jehrico missiles in silos that would require a direct hit to take out, they just bought two more subs that can carry nuclear cruise missiles.
The best thing Iran can hope for is to acheive some kind of MAD deterrence situation.
As for Israel taking on Iran by itself, good luck
Given their recent poor performance against Iran's protoges Hezbollah, I think taking on Iran proper is biting off more than they can chew. It's a threat floated specifically for the purpose of persuading the US to do it for them.
While I think Bush himself would like nothing better than to get the ball rolling before 2008, his administration as an entity is divided, with Condi insisting on a diplomatic track, and Rummy and Cheney and the rest of the "neocon" crowd chomping at the bit for war ASAP. Given how well Iraq turned out, I think Bush is hesitating: and good for him. A war with Iran will make the disaster in Iraq look positively quaint.
BTW to the previous poster: if you think Saudi Arabia or Egypt are "allies" of Iran (SA especially), you need to do a little more homework...
[edit on 8/24/06 by xmotex]
The best thing Iran can hope for is to acheive some kind of MAD deterrence situation.