It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Timeseer
Originally posted by Vegemite
This is good. Pluto should have never been a planet
You should have never opened a science book. Cause you are killing science right now.
What gives you the right to say such ludicrous? Justify it even?
Originally posted by Vegemite
its just another kbo.
Originally posted by Vegemite
But i dont understand ehy peaple are so attached to pluto being a planet.
Originally posted by Vegemite
Its not like its being destroyed, its still there but labeled different.
Originally posted by Vegemite
Its like someone getting upset because some one decided that small donuts are gonna be called donettes
Originally posted by sardion2000
Woah, these geeky discussions do get intense
Originally posted by Timeseer
Why are you so eager to agree that Pluto shouldn't be considered a planet? I mean the new definition of a planet would identify both the Earth and Jupiter as Dwarf Planets.
[edit on 24-8-2006 by Timeseer]
Originally posted by Vegemite
Originally posted by Timeseer
Originally posted by Vegemite
This is good. Pluto should have never been a planet
You should have never opened a science book. Cause you are killing science right now.
What gives you the right to say such ludicrous? Justify it even?
Umm becuase its silly to think of Pluto as a planet when its much more similar to Kuiper Belt Objects.
Originally posted by Vegemite
Neptune isnt a KBO because Neptune destroys KBOs.
Originally posted by Vegemite
If Pluto could capture Neptune in its orbit like Neptune captured its moon Triton or Mars captured the asteroid Phobos then I might reconsider it.
Originally posted by Vegemite
You want me to reframe from speaking then you ask me a question? Whats that question even supposed to mean?
Originally posted by Vegemite
Are you suggesting that planetary scientists are rich slobs with nothing better to do then to reclassify planets to upset whiny little children?
Originally posted by Vegemite
Yes I would. Just because a planet looks like a duck and acts like a duck doesnt make it a duck, because real planets run over ducks that are in their way.
That is a horrible analogy
Originally posted by sardion2000
The Dwarf Planet designation for Pluto is logical and draws a distinction between the two types.
Originally posted by masqua
Originally posted by sardion2000
Woah, these geeky discussions do get intense
They sure seem to...
Planet or dwarf planet, ancient god or cartoon mutt...it's still there out on the diminished perimeter of our solar system home and thereby special.
Originally posted by elitegamer23
why would i be so eager to agree with cmdrkeenkid?
Originally posted by elitegamer23
lol, is that a rhetorical question?
Originally posted by elitegamer23
cmdrkeenkid knows the universe more then you know the back of your hand, that is why i would be eager to agree with him.
Originally posted by elitegamer23
now you have me confused, if earth and jupiter are now dwarf planets, does that mean we have just 6 planets ?
Originally posted by elitegamer23
i think your might just be trolling here.
Originally posted by spacedoubt
Originally posted by masqua
Originally posted by sardion2000
Woah, these geeky discussions do get intense
They sure seem to...
Planet or dwarf planet, ancient god or cartoon mutt...it's still there out on the diminished perimeter of our solar system home and thereby special.
So true. And there is one other thing too.
Pluto, does not even care!
Pluto doesn't even know that we call it Pluto!
On the other hand, I sort of wish this could have waited until NASA's New Horizons spacecraft, sailed past. There would have been much more support for the argument, one way or the other.
Originally posted by Timeseer
I am sorry but arguing is not trolling. So stop being such a baby about it.
Let me identify to you what trolling is...
Trolling is when you actively and surely make an attempt to anger someone... provoking a flame war. Or simply making offensive topics or topics that don't hold the same information within in that is asserted in the title.
[edit on 24-8-2006 by Timeseer]
Originally posted by elitegamer23
your calling me a baby but your not trolling.
Originally posted by elitegamer23
read YOUR deffinition. only a troll would know such a detailed deffinition . why argue anyways, why not try discussing it. it shows more intelligence.
Originally posted by Timeseer
I am sorry but arguing is not trolling.
[edit on 24-8-2006 by Timeseer]
Originally posted by Timeseer
Originally posted by Vegemite
Neptune isnt a KBO because Neptune destroys KBOs.
Pluto also destroys KBOs or should I say absorbs them. This just makes it more like Neptune is a KBO. Because KBOs always bombard one another... and those that are just too small like pebble are just instantly annihilated and absorbed.
So truly this just makes Neptune more of a KBO...
Originally posted by Vegemite
If Pluto could capture Neptune in its orbit like Neptune captured its moon Triton or Mars captured the asteroid Phobos then I might reconsider it.
What about Nix and Hydra? Aren't they captured satelites like Deimos and Phobos, they sure about as small as Deimos and Phobos?
And I'm sorry but what you had with Pluto capturing Neptune in orbit around it is just so damn stupid!
There are hundreds of trojans that in Jupiter's orbit that don't orbit around Jupiter. Does that make Jupiter not a planet? Well base on the current definition of a planet made by the Idiotic Astronomical Union it ought to be. Just like the Earth has several objects in its orbit that don't orbit around it. And don't you find it funny that even though Pluto orbits into Neptune's Orbit, it has never been captured as a satelite?
So PLEASE for the love of Newtons Laws stop posting senseless crap. Or atleast take the time to think of what you are speaking of... because you make those "whiny" children seem like geniuses.
The end product of secondary disc accretion is a small number of relatively large bodies(planets) in either non intersecting or resonant orbits, which prevent collisions between them. Asteriods and comets(including KBOs, differ from planets because they can collide with eachother and other planets
Originally posted by Murcielago
I'm suprised...I didn't think they would actually demote Pluto.
I do agree with there decision...It seems the only people who dont like it are the ones who know nothing of Pluto, and think it deserves its planet status just because its being called in fot 70+ years.