It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
"If a human was to leave Earth travelling at the speed of light to Siruis (4 light years away) when he got there only 25 minutes or so would have passed by on his clock, while hundreds or thousands of years would have passed for people on Earth, but only 4 years would have passed for an observer from the solar system of Siruis."
Originally posted by Access Denied
So given this understanding of this common misconception, do you think this refutes the most common argument against the possibility for ET visitation... that an astronaut from let’s say a solar system 100 light years away would be dead before he even got here… even if they had a craft that could travel close to the speed of light?
(That is of course assuming cryogenic sleep isn’t a practical possibility.)
Conversely, if we assume for the sake of argument the possibility that UFOs are merely unmanned scientific probes under some form of AI control and that they were sent here from a solar system 100 light years away, would that be a worthy scientific endeavor given it would take at least 200 years to get the data back?
(That is of course assuming real-time quantum communication isn’t a practical possibility.)
Originally posted by Access Denied
Originally posted by lost_shaman
I'd think so. I mean you don't want to be sitting around 200 years from now thinking darn we could be getting data today if we'd only done this 200 years ago.
LMAO
I agree...
Originally posted by lost_shaman
Hey Ectoterrestrial,
Yes its amazing we all agree on something but I'm sure that there is lots more we all have in common that simply hasn't been discussed yet. Just a hunch.
Originally posted by Esoteric Teacher
I have been on ATS for some time now. And it never ceases to amaze me that conversations concerning the UFO phenomenon and Extra-Terrestrial visitations usually hit a wall when the idea of other worldly visitors is mixed with the idea of time travel.
How can you travel through space without travelling through time?
The closer an observer comes to reaching the speed of light, the slower time is experienced for them in comparrison to someone who is moving far slower. Carl Sagan on his "Cosmos" series explained it as such:
"PARA[HRASING ?? I think, Carl Sagan -
"If a human was to leave Earth travelling at the speed of light to Siruis (4 light years away) when he got there only 25 minutes or so would have passed by on his clock, while hundreds or thousands of years would have passed for people on Earth, but only 4 years would have passed for an observer from the solar system of Siruis."
My point to this thread is there is no differentiation between space travel, and time travel. There is no Space travelling without Time travelling.
Edited to include "PARAPHRASING??" with Carl Sagan's Quote
Thanks to XphilesPhan for pointing out my error.
[edit on 24-8-2006 by Esoteric Teacher]
Originally posted by Sonata
One thing however if you were on a vessel that only traveled so far it would in fact take four years to reach a destination it would still be linear. Of course time is a perception but still exists as a mesurement in space. If you left now by the speed of light to a 4 light year away star in all actuallitly 8 years would have past for a single trip. This would occur if your destintaion was to earth. This is talking speed of light though.
The crew spends 0.018 years or 1 week in space!