Neutralizing a nuclear weapon

page: 1
0

log in

join

posted on Aug, 23 2006 @ 01:14 PM
link   
I have always been interested in radioactivity and nuclear weapons. When I was younger and in college, I took a Physical Chemistry class (don't ask how I did
)
in any case, they spoke about these little particles called neutrinos. Now don't ask me WHY I thought this, but I got it in my head that maybe neutrinos could "neutralize" nuclear weapons. It really was not presented to me or anything, so I have no idea why I thought that. It just sounded like a nifty idea. Well I googled it, and it seems to be pretty embraced...

www.newscientist.com...
physicsweb.org...

What do you all think about this? It seems to be a perfect investment...




posted on Aug, 24 2006 @ 03:37 AM
link   

Originally posted by RetinoidReceptor
It seems to be a perfect investment...



The storage ring would have to be 1000 km across - hundreds of times larger than the biggest present day accelerators. The magnets in the specially built muon storage ring would need to be one to two orders of magnitude stronger than those currently available to construct a realistically sized machine. Moreover, the cost of building such a device could be over $100 billion and it would consume 50 GW of energy – the entire power consumption of the United Kingdom.



posted on Aug, 24 2006 @ 04:24 AM
link   
Radioactive decay is hard to neutralize because you have to create a dampening effect. Where each energy "signature" is matched by an opposite, countering field.

On your theory though, if you could increase the density of these neutrinos to where they would absorb the energy released, that would certainly help in removing the harmful effects of the radiation.



posted on Aug, 24 2006 @ 04:29 AM
link   
WOW! this is 3 years old too, very interesting info and totally possible to build one too for USA any way thats pocket money, wonder if military has R&D these neutrino beams for a while they might even have nuclear powered portable versions, maybe even ones that can be bolted onto aircraft and fly over enemy territory and zap zap zap lots useless nukes.

Is it possible also that the UFO's seen deactivating nukes used this method? and maybe they were secret government craft with this technology on board testing the effect-fullness of the deactivation of nukes?

[edit on 24-8-2006 by blobby]



posted on Aug, 24 2006 @ 04:43 AM
link   

Originally posted by blobby
WOW! this is 3 years old too, very interesting info and totally possible to build one too for USA any way thats pocket money, wonder if military has R&D these neutrino beams for a while they might even have nuclear powered portable versions, maybe even ones that can be bolted onto aircraft and fly over enemy territory and zap zap zap lots useless nukes.

Is it possible also that the UFO's seen deactivating nukes used this method? and maybe they were secret government craft with this technology on board testing the effect-fullness of the deactivation of nukes?

[edit on 24-8-2006 by blobby]


The US military uses DEW weapons, if I understand what you are talking about, for disruption. The original thread was about neutraliziing.
These DEW weapons are known to be in existence and essentially disrupt the harmonic balance of a material to create a structure failure. They are in reserve for total engagement right now, and wouldn't be employed for a limited event.



posted on Aug, 24 2006 @ 04:53 AM
link   
I highly doubt that could be made into something that actually works. Too many variables, too hard to reproduce.



posted on Aug, 25 2006 @ 01:33 AM
link   
Actually, it's similar to ultra-sound devices where a disruption can create a disturbance in things like tub of water. I've seen washing machines that clean clothes utilizing the harmonic imbalance created with ultra sound.
Sounds odd, but if you were to expand on this concept with another form of energy, the same principle applies.

Like the direct-fire lasers they use to cut metal in die making.





top topics
 
0

log in

join