It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Kinross Case missing F-89 Jet has been found

page: 1
0

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 23 2006 @ 10:59 AM
link   
I found this today and thought you guys interested in the Kinross Case would like to see the following news:

www.ufoevidence.org...

Now what do you make of that?




posted on Aug, 23 2006 @ 11:05 AM
link   
nice find. This is especially intriguing:

"In searching the general vicinity of the wreck, we believe we have also found a part of the object that the F-89 collided with."


no russians? soviets? Little?



posted on Aug, 23 2006 @ 11:14 AM
link   
Yeah they still haven't come clean yet as to what this other material is unsurprisingly, not sure if it's our answer though!!



posted on Aug, 23 2006 @ 11:20 AM
link   

"In searching the general vicinity of the wreck, we believe we have also found a part of the object that the F-89 collided with. We are still in the process of documenting the mystery object." Jimenez declined to elaborate on what the object is. "There is still a lot of wreck site forensics to complete" he said.


source of quote


Another twist in the tail? I wonder what the mystery object could be?



posted on Aug, 23 2006 @ 11:20 AM
link   
There is already a thread on this here.
www.abovetopsecret.com...'

will be intersting to follow this one.



posted on Aug, 23 2006 @ 01:38 PM
link   
Unfotunately I posted it first, not sure how it works here on ATS....



posted on Aug, 23 2006 @ 01:43 PM
link   

Originally posted by October
Unfotunately I posted it first, not sure how it works here on ATS....


If you posted first then this is the thread where it should be discussed IMO.

Your post also included a link to your source.



posted on Aug, 23 2006 @ 03:24 PM
link   
Interesting,

I think withholding information regarding the believed collision artefact is a mistake. They should release information regarding it immediately, while clearly stating that it may or may not be a collision artefact or artefacts.



posted on Aug, 23 2006 @ 04:16 PM
link   
The jet was found in one piece, but the thing it collided with lost pieces?? If what it collided with was a UFO, then that UFO isn't very strong... Although I hope they release their findings very soon before they 'disapear' ..

-Jimmy-



posted on Aug, 23 2006 @ 11:41 PM
link   

Originally posted by October
Unfotunately I posted it first, not sure how it works here on ATS....


October, unfortunately you did not post this subject first
Look at the posted dates.... I think there is some guidelines about posting on ATS... I dunno, probably would help if you did a search before posting. But don't worry, you are only the 100th person to do something like that this month.



posted on Aug, 28 2006 @ 04:55 PM
link   
The Canadian government wont let them near the site without a coast guard escort. Im sure the U.S. government has some behind the scenes strings to pull here too.

Is this the only F-89 to go down over Lake Superior? If so, then its most likely Moncla's jet.



posted on Aug, 28 2006 @ 05:07 PM
link   
just go to there New Project's and Select the first one (Scorpion 89)...has all kinds of information...like pictures of the sonar hit and the location of the dive!
www.greatlakesdive.com...

[edit on 28-8-2006 by Skeptik1st]



new topics




 
0

log in

join