It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Pyros
One has to believe that the Iranians, at this point, would be much more interested in expending time, money, and energy into putting their Iraqi-aquired Fulcrums and Mirages in the air......rather than wasting their time with a bunch of jury-rigged, 30 year old Tomcats, no?
Originally posted by Sir Solomon
I got to thinking about this thread while traveling to college today (that's a good four hour drive, plenty time to think, eh?), and something hit me. What if there were more planes than what Iran let on? The black market is still strong as ever, and some people in Russia are willing to overlook things that happen for a price.
Originally posted by Harlequin
You do know hat Iran bought the plans for an early version of the MiG - I-2000 and are building it as the Shafaq? A Low Observables lightweight attack aircraft?
Originally posted by Sir Solomon
What I am getting at is if Iran can build underground nuclear facilities without the world knowing, what is to stop it from hiding some planes in other underground hardened bunkers that we don't know about? Those planes could be anything.
Originally posted by emile
Sorry, I do think so. You can test nuke underground but aircraft, you must test it in air. Even such big country USSR, US satellite had found what they flying as soon as they flew. Any weapon you testing can be hiden,but aircraft and surface fightingship.
Originally posted by northwolf
F-14A AWACS/Fire-control platforms searching and targetting for LO Light Fighters (shafagh) without radars carrying 2-3 BVRAMs... Would this sound as a credible tactic (IF Shafagh would be in service)
Originally posted by emile
If there is no air force base could be used to detroy Iran Nuclear Station, so no F-22 could be used to support US force striking, I strongly worried that Super Hornet can defeat F-14 which has still being used by Iran. So my question for experts here is that do you know how many F-14s and phoenix missiles still can join fight in air today? I think the F-14 is an unbeatable fighter no matter who use it, while I say this which means you can NOT consider that your enemy always being a foolish man.
Originally posted by Harlequin
The aircraft is powered by the same unit that powers the MiG-29 , which russia Are upgrading for the Iranian Airforce
Originally posted by Harlequin
`couple of decades old` - wrong - the design is from the very earliest 1990 - thats 16 years not ` a couple of decades` but then again the F-22 is of a similar vintage.
Originally posted by Harlequin
… so the F-22 is a 5 layer plywood constructed and small aircraft? i think not so stop being so blinded that other countries do not have technology to a similar level to the usa.
Originally posted by Harlequin
wrong and wrong - they are using russian engines , and will build MANY airframes and fly them - please think outside the box.
Originally posted by Harlequin
no , they can buy from russia if they really want to, but being self sufficient is far more important - i do believe there own long range missile tech is superior to that of , say , NK.
Originally posted by emile
If there is no air force base could be used to detroy Iran Nuclear Station, so no F-22 could be used to support US force striking, I strongly worried that Super Hornet can defeat F-14 which has still being used by Iran. So my question for experts here is that do you know how many F-14s and phoenix missiles still can join fight in air today? I think the F-14 is an unbeatable fighter no matter who use it, while I say this which means you can NOT consider that your enemy always being a foolish man.
Originally posted by WestPoint23
The Shafagh, I’m not buying this LO crap, first I want to see its radar specs, weapon specs, avionic specs, and this LO technology demonstrated. Sorry but it looks to me like a light trainer/attack aircraft which is small and hence might be dubbed by some as LO, which I don’t think it is, not in the true sense.