It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by BaackReferring to the two above-mentioned subgenres, it could be argued that a "mad slasher" movie like "Friday the 13th" is actually a crime story, a psychological murder mystery, albeit told with horror-cinema clichés. Likewise, John Carpenter's "The Thing" is a science-fiction alien invasion story, made by a filmmaker with a mastery of the grammar of horror cinema. The same goes for "The Last House on the Left," "Alien," "Psycho," and a host of others.
Originally posted by GradyPhilpott
However, the supernatural seems to be the easiest way to scare the dickens out of teenage girls, so that would be the theme of choice for those who produce such films and whose primary goal is to turn a buck.
imdb.com...
Originally posted by chissler
Talking of the slasher category you have to acknowledge Scream. The original of these films was an amazing movie, kept you on the edge until the end and stayed within the aspects of reality. What I loved about this film was it approached itself like a horror film, acknowledging the Rules of a Horror Flick.
...
IMHO the best horror flicks are not of the supernatural. Psycological thrillers are where its at.
Originally posted by GradyPhilpott
The vast majority of horror films are low budget. Some of the best films ever made are horror films. Some low budget horror films are some of the best horror films ever made. Some low-budget horror films actually strive for art.
Nonetheless, when you consider the genre of horror films the majority of films you must consider are those that are made just to turn a buck, even if some of those turn out to be classics.
Since the supernatural is the simplest way to be scary, then it would follow that those who produce horror films for the primary purpose of making money, as opposed to creating art, will choose the supernatural, as it is the one that requires the least originality.
If I had to choose a favorite horror film, it would have to be this one, which is both low budget and does not involve the supernatural, at least not overtly:
The Blair Witch Project (1999)
Originally posted by dr_strangecraft
in some ways, North by Northwest is a horror flick, until about 2 / 3 of the way into it.
On the other hand, Supernatural effects don't MAKE a horror film. For instance, the Harry Potter movies are not really about the supernatural, they are about coming of age in a british boarding school. They are simply "Goodby, Mr. Chips" set among dragons and elves.
And what about Sixth Sense? It definitely had the mood of a horror movie, AND dealth with the supernatural, but also was primarily a mystery movie.
Originally posted by GradyPhilpott
Here's one of the best horror films, and made for TV movies, ever made that doesn't use the supernatural.
Duel
And can we forget Jaws, another Spielberg classic.
Originally posted by dr_strangecraft
North by northwest has some sequences in it, where the focus is one the FEAR caused by being framed, being hunted, being on the run from the police at the same time you're running from criminals, etc. I understand that NxNW is a suspense/thriller. My point is just, Hitchcock could be so over the top sometimes, that for a few seconds it FEELS like a horror movie.
There's one Hitchock film where a guy is in East Germany, spying. This woman his trying to kill him. He wrestles with her in a farmhouse, and eventually gets killed by having her head stuck in the oven an then gassed. That's fairly horrific, for a spy flick.
THE BIRDS is another film that while not supernatural per se, definitely has a preternatural feel, with things being SO abnormal, it feels like horror. . . .