It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Whitley Strieber's Grays

page: 2
1
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 22 2006 @ 03:28 PM
link   

Originally posted by sigung86
Hmmm....

Now, TimeSeer, would be the time to produce some actual evidence. At least it would appear so. Claims like you are making seem to require some evidence to base them in fact.


Define evidence?



Originally posted by sigung86
On the other hand, I can produce a picture of Ethel Merman, and no she's not so lizard-like.


Lizard like? I'm sorry but tall, grey, red eyes, and lavender hair is not an indication of something with the appearance of a lizard.

Perhaps next time you should actually read portion of the text that I submit and not think of it all with a immature and thoughtless mentality. As it would be unwise to simply guess towards something you have yet to understand.


Originally posted by Ectoterrestrial
No offense, Timeseer, but you are being rather rude for a 'good little boy or girl'.


No offense, but you just proved you don't know what the word "rude" can actualy imply. This is very common, so don't take it as an insult or something like that when you should be aware of what an actual insult is.

I was speaking in the tone they would address you in... how is that rude? I even made citation that it was in the tone they would address to you in. Did anyone ever taught you what the meaning of "rude" can simply imply? Or do you associate that word with anything in a sensitive matter that generates an atmosphere of "rudeness" to you? It wouldn't be rude to me if someone said such. And I am the type to easily get offended by insults.


Originally posted by Ectoterrestrial
I understand that people are insulting your reality


I am not the only one here that has encounters with extraterrestrials. Don't be so intent on being a troll in this domain. Because you certainly are starting to act like one.



Originally posted by Ectoterrestrial
but could you manage to let your super-ego project a little less wrath, please, if you intent on presenting yourself as enlightened?


I never said I was enlightened. I said I was informed. By the way, wrathful would have been a correct word to use in your sentence. In addition, "super-ego" would imply association of the "super-ego" part of my personality and psychological well being... and I am not using that part of my personality and psychological well being. In fact I am just using my ego... as in "self."


Originally posted by Ectoterrestrial
For the very reason that you are so spiteful, I am disinclined to take you seriously.


There is no need to by crybaby about this whole bit and I don't really have of a care for people taking what I say seriously. I'm just speaking my mind, just as you would under the same conditions. Although I bet you would be writing a novel about it and demanding to be brought on Montel or some other talk show as a guess to speak your mind to the public. Wouldn't that be exciting?


But I'm not being spiteful... after all I'd have to spite or show nastiness or malevolence to be spiteful... which haven't yet performed. You can be my guest if that is the sort behavior you find most fitting of myself, but I should caution you that if you think I'm being spiteful then that obviously means you haven't been outdoors very oftenly and I suggest that perhaps you should try doing so for your own psychological well being.




posted on Aug, 22 2006 @ 03:48 PM
link   
Man I love it when Trekkies get on this forum - Don't forget to use you FICTION Tags. Extraordinary Claims require Extraordinary Proof.

And....do the Galactic Rules of whatever come in PDF. Better what is the format used by Aliens? Better are they Mac People or PC people?



posted on Aug, 22 2006 @ 03:56 PM
link   
Timeseer, instead of correcting people's grammar and acting like a psychiatrist, why don't you tell us more about your "adventures" and how you came to know about all this "special" information that some of us don't seem to believe very easily...

You went from making fantastic claims about confederations and queens to analyzing people and telling them what they "meant to say..."



posted on Aug, 22 2006 @ 03:58 PM
link   
Thanks for the back up Ecto.. couldn't figure out s straight way to say that.

And you, as well, Diplomat.

TimeSeer... Let me see if I can clarify for you. Other than your channeled input or whatever, is there any evidence of what you speak of? I'd be interested in seeing something tangible inlieu of browbeating because I didn't post exactly as you thought I should.


[edit on 22-8-2006 by sigung86]



posted on Aug, 22 2006 @ 04:10 PM
link   

Originally posted by nullster
Man I love it when Trekkies get on this forum - Don't forget to use you FICTION Tags. Extraordinary Claims require Extraordinary Proof.


Only if I want to give proof to my "extraordinary claims."


Originally posted by nullster
And....do the Galactic Rules of whatever come in PDF.


What PDF?


Originally posted by nullster
Better what is the format used by Aliens? Better are they Mac People or PC people?


A mac is a PC... you are making lame jokes.


Originally posted by Diplomat
Timeseer, instead of correcting people's grammar and acting like a psychiatrist


But I can't help it. Some people need immediate help with their problems. And there is no excuse for bad grammar unless you are rushing yourself or you have a physical disorder.


Originally posted by Diplomat
why don't you tell us more about your "adventures" and how you came to know about all this "special" information that some of us don't seem to believe very easily...


Hmm... let me think for a second. Nah... draw your own conclusions. I am just speaking my mind... if you want to know more either wait for me to feel up to it or you can just waith six years for "them" to tell you in person. If I were you I'd wait, because as a fellow human I am subjected to the same mentality handicap like everyone else and therefore anything I say may not be 100% correct even if I am speaking 100% the truth, which I so happen to be doing right now.


Originally posted by Diplomat
You went from making fantastic claims about confederations and queens


1 Queen and 1 Confederation. Thanks for proving my point to the statement above. "You can't take any human seriously, even if they are speaking 100% the truth." After all, making exaggerated claims like you have just done is a part of our "speciality."


Originally posted by Diplomat
to analyzing people and telling them what they "meant to say..."


Correcting grammar is in no way similar to simply changing the entire text of what one says. If I am not mistaken I believe you are being a bit too paranoid right now.

[edit on 22-8-2006 by Timeseer]



posted on Aug, 22 2006 @ 04:14 PM
link   


No offense, but you just proved you don't what the word "rude" can actualy imply. This is very common, so don't take it as an insult or something that when you should be aware of what an actual insult is.

We disagree. I perceive that you are very rude. Perhaps that is why you were shut out of someone else's web site? Perhaps you do not understand this, and this furthers your frustration and requirement to migrate from site to site.



I speaking in the tone they would address you in... how is that rude? I even made citation that it was in the tone they would address to you in. Did anyone ever taught you what meaning of "rude" can simply imply? Or do you associate that word with anything sensitive matter that generates an atmosphere of "rudeness" to you? It wouldn't be rude to me if someone said such. I am the type to easily get offended by insults.

I sense your tone is rude. If the aliens speak this way, then I would perceive them as rude as well. Yes, I associate 'an atmosphere of rudeness' with rudeness. I'm just funny that way.


I am not the only one here that has encounters with extraterrestrials. Don't be so intent on being a troll in this domain. Because you certainly are starting to act like one.

It appears that you are generalizing my response to you as a response to everyone. Perhaps because you do not understand why I respond to you in this way, you reach for my possible motivation, such as trolling. That is not my intent.



I never said I was enlightened. I said I was informed.

Very well. That sounds reasonable and I concede that point. You have been informed by them. I understand better now.



By the way, wrathful would have been a correct word to use in your sentence.

I disagree. I spoke of the object you hurled in the spiritual domain. Not the character of your speach.



In addition, "super-ego" would imply association of the "super-ego" part of my personality and psychological well being... and I am not using that part of my personality and psychological well being. In fact I am just using my ego... as in "self."

I disagree. My personal opinion is that your ego was hurt by the assertions of the skeptics, and that your super-ego saught to protect it by being rude and insultingly assertive to your detractors.



I'm just speaking my mind, just as you would under the same conditions. Although I bet you would be writing a novel about it and demanding to be brought on Montel or some other talk show as a guess to speak your mind to the public. Wouldn't that be exciting?


I disagree with those points, including the assertions about my character!



But I'm not being spiteful... after all I'd have to spite or show nastiness or malevolence to be spiteful... which haven't yet performed. You can be my guest if that is the sort behavior you find most fitting of myself, but I should caution you that if you think I'm being spiteful then that obviously means you haven't been outdoors very oftenly and I suggest that perhaps you should try doing so for your own psychological well being.



posted on Aug, 22 2006 @ 04:25 PM
link   
Oooops!!! Time to get out of here before someone can't provide evidence of what they are touting, and someone says something silly, and someone draws a red card.

C ya around. This whole thread just went lame...



posted on Aug, 22 2006 @ 04:48 PM
link   

Originally posted by Ectoterrestrial
We disagree.


There is more than one person of you?


Originally posted by Ectoterrestrial
I perceive that you are very rude.


And I perceive that you are more rude and very sensitive of your own feelings. If you need a teddy-bear I'll be glad to buy you own on ebay and ship it off to your street address if you decide to give your street address. But that is unimportant.



Originally posted by Ectoterrestrial
Perhaps that is why you were shut out of someone else's web site?


Forum... and it wasn't because I said anything. In fact I was banned from there a month after the last post I had made which was in the spammatory section. And area specifically designed for making spam messages. And the grounds I was banned on was simply being a tool that other users could use in creating spam and flame wars. By the way I don't think four posts would count for such an extreme measure, don't you? No I am sorry, was I being rude again? For some odd reason, I am just always rude. Maybe its because I am secretly an African American and I haven't yet told anyone that.


Originally posted by Ectoterrestrial
Perhaps you do not understand this, and this furthers your frustration and requirement to migrate from site to site.


Migrate? "Yes I am an internet virus that can communicate with you on your computer through this forum." No... I don't migrate from forum to forum to forum to exert my frustration on something that had occured a year ago. I am not THAT immature.


Originally posted by Ectoterrestrial
I sense your tone is rude.


So you use your feelings to detect my "malicious" behavior? You do know that you shouldn't rely on your feelings when it comes to sensing reality.


Originally posted by Ectoterrestrial
If the aliens speak this way, then I would perceive them as rude as well.


They are sarcastic and sometimes also reverse-sarcastic, depending on the extraterrestrial. That is only as rude as one with a sensitive enough mind would perceive. To me being sarcastic is just freely expressing one's self and to me simply expressing one's self isn't being rude. Making a big deal out of nothing and making long page of sensitivity issues is rude. Because not only does it waste everyone's time, but it also is rude to me personally, since you are speaking of someone in completely negative tone with farfetched allegations. Have I ever done that to you? No...


Originally posted by Ectoterrestrial
Yes, I associate 'an atmosphere of rudeness' with rudeness. I'm just funny that way.


"Unique"

And it is really more of an atmosphere of "sensitivity" than an atmosphere of "rudeness."


Originally posted by Ectoterrestrial
It appears that you are generalizing my response to you as a response to everyone.


To everyone else? R-really...? Normally when I quote someone I simply am talking to that person... but since it is quite futile to argue against you and surely it would only provoke you to making a viccious and unnecessary flame or spam war that the moderators do not need to deal with. With that said, I can suggest to you that when i am quoting what you are saying and replying back to it, I am only speaking to you.


Originally posted by Ectoterrestrial
Perhaps because you do not understand why I respond to you in this way, you reach for my possible motivation, such as trolling. That is not my intent.


Almost all trolls say they are not trolling. But trying to provoke me is most likely what you are indeed doing. Especially with some of the statment you have already made.\



I disagree. My personal opinion is that your ego was hurt by the assertions of the skeptics, and that your super-ego saught to protect it by being rude and insultingly assertive to your detractors.


My ego? No I deal with skeptics all the time and I am quite use to their antics. Actually if anything it would be my "id" that would seek to protect my ego, since my id is eccentially the self-centered portion my being, but that would only be true if I was actually hurt by what you had said. I am hurt that you think I was being rude, well slightly, more like just annoyed and a bit offended. But I am not hurt by anything else you had said.



I disagree with those points, including the assertions about my character!


Touchy... when its my character that was on the line then its no big deal, but when its your character then all hell breaks loose. *Makes note to self* "Never speak to this individual's character ever again."



I'll let that speak for itself.


Eh yep... let discredit speak forth as creditation... good for you...

Maybe we should stop this fruitless arguement and concentrate on the topic, before either of us is warned for misconduct?

[edit on 22-8-2006 by Timeseer]



posted on Aug, 22 2006 @ 04:53 PM
link   

Originally posted by sigung86
Oooops!!! Time to get out of here before someone can't provide evidence of what they are touting, and someone says something silly, and someone draws a red card.

C ya around. This whole thread just went lame...

Well I think it is better this way. Someone needs to call these people on their B.S. or at least ask for more information/evidence. You will see people like Timeseer who simply doesn't want to say anything more. That is fine, it just doesn't help us believe the crazy stuff he is talking about...

I think it is better to get to the bottom of these people's outrageous claims before a bunch of people waste hours of their day reading crazy stories that might actually be completely made up by some guy with an internet connection and too much imaginative time on their hands...



posted on Aug, 22 2006 @ 10:12 PM
link   

Originally posted by Timeseer
And I perceive that you are more rude and very sensitive of your own feelings. If you need a teddy-bear I'll be glad to buy you own on ebay


I dont know who's claiming what to whom, nor who's being rude to who.

I just stopped into put my name in the hopper for a teddy bear. I love Bears.



posted on Aug, 23 2006 @ 12:12 AM
link   

Originally posted by Diplomat

Well I think it is better this way. Someone needs to call these people on their B.S. or at least ask for more information/evidence. You will see people like Timeseer who simply doesn't want to say anything more. That is fine, it just doesn't help us believe the crazy stuff he is talking about... etc.


I agree totally Diplomat. It's obvious that with all the vague, hazy language, the ducking, dodging and weaving, and generally mendacious, or misleading quality of the non-information, that there is nothing to see here.

Unfortunately, for me, some time back there was a fellow on here, and I forget the name, who was purporting to be giving all sorts of generalized, yet wonderous information from his higher self. I called the B Stuff card, numerous times, in the thread, in an attempt to get him to fess up, and come clean. What I got for my trouble was a dressing down from a moderator, because I didn't call in the moderators, and i suspect I got some points revoked. I apparently became to strident in my demand for proof, and hurt his feelings.

I don't post often enough, generally, to really rack up lots of points, and so, that above, accompanied with the recent 1000 point deduction because I misunderstood, and misused the Tag feature has made me gun shy about getting involved too strenuously in arguments, even when the suppostion and the complete lack of evidence, so obviously creates an absurd supposition.

But please, Tres Proceed.



posted on Aug, 23 2006 @ 03:53 AM
link   
The tragic thing is that Whitley Strieber has taken the entire alien phenomenon, which is the transcendental wonder of our technological age, and stated that it comes directly from the Nazis. Then he wrote in a recent journal that the best aliens are the Blonde aliens and we can all be placed into blonde bodies if we are really fortunate. This is similar to what Hitler was aiming for when he tried to breed a superior blonde race. Whitley says the blondes use cloning to make new perfect blonde bodies which they simply transfer their souls into. He claims all people have the opportunity to follow the blondes and be part of the superior race.

This is the truth he is teaching at his website. So basically he is giving the glory to Hitler and the nazis for bringing us the grays, while promoting the blonde race as the superior race we should all aim to be part of.


On the day 666, (6th June 2006), I was having a lovely peaceful day communing with God and gardening in the sunshine and I wondered when Satan would show up and do something to ruin the day. In the afternoon I was beginning to think Satan had passed me by but suddenly an email from Whitley Strieber's website was sent to me inviting me to join. It was the only odd thing that happened that day and the only mail I received. I figured then that Whitley and Satan were somehow connected.



posted on Aug, 23 2006 @ 04:53 AM
link   
Strieber's a fantasy writer. He's done a couple of good EBE documentaries though.

Dallas



posted on Aug, 23 2006 @ 05:29 AM
link   

Originally posted by probedbygrays
The tragic thing is that Whitley Strieber has taken the entire alien phenomenon, which is the transcendental wonder of our technological age, and stated that it comes directly from the Nazis. Then he wrote in a recent journal that the best aliens are the Blonde aliens and we can all be placed into blonde bodies if we are really fortunate. This is similar to what Hitler was aiming for when he tried to breed a superior blonde race. Whitley says the blondes use cloning to make new perfect blonde bodies which they simply transfer their souls into. He claims all people have the opportunity to follow the blondes and be part of the superior race.

This is the truth he is teaching at his website. So basically he is giving the glory to Hitler and the nazis for bringing us the grays, while promoting the blonde race as the superior race we should all aim to be part of.


On the day 666, (6th June 2006), I was having a lovely peaceful day communing with God and gardening in the sunshine and I wondered when Satan would show up and do something to ruin the day. In the afternoon I was beginning to think Satan had passed me by but suddenly an email from Whitley Strieber's website was sent to me inviting me to join. It was the only odd thing that happened that day and the only mail I received. I figured then that Whitley and Satan were somehow connected.


I read two of his books. I don't recall any mention of Nazis and I forgot alot of what he said. Do you have a page link where this nazi stuff is ?

Isn't Whitley into Wicca ? I don't know much about that religion, some say it is satanic, others say it isn't .... and Allen Hynek (consultant to Blue Book) was a Rosicrucian. The red cross order uses aryan nazi, hermetic, freemasonry and luciferian philosophy, and teaches Jesus was a fake.
Sound familiar?

Your 666 incident is interesting.



[edit on 23-8-2006 by violet]



posted on Aug, 24 2006 @ 08:18 PM
link   
One other strange thing I found is that Whitley stole my ideas shortly after I wrote them. I started a thread titled 'In love with America" and the very next day Whitley wrote a poem called 'Why I love America' and read it over the airwaves. Then I wrote that 'fear is the only thing to be afraid of as it stops us from advancing in knowledge of who the aliens are'; and shortly after that Whitley started writing that he hates people who fear the aliens.

I also wrote a thread describing how the gray elves raise people from birth and shape the type of person they become in life. People said they don't know if it's true but it sounds like a great idea for a book. Now I hear Whitley has written a book about how grays raise children from birth and shape what they become in life. So you can be sure he stole the idea from that thread I started.

Don't go looking for threads at Whitley's site though because they are deleted regularly.

One truly suspicious thing was when a woman started a thread about a ufo her family saw. She said she wanted to go see John Mack about it. But a new woman poster logged on straight away and said she was a trained experienced psychic killer from the secret government who had been trained by Nazis and she knew that John Mack was a corrupt person. Then a few days after that John Mack was killed by a drunk driver. When Whitley's friends die of diseases he claims they were given the diseases purposefully to silence them, but when John Mack was killed he claimed it was just an accident. Even though a professed trained experienced killer who described her murders in detail was at that time on Whitley's site stating that John Mack was corrupt.

I had been visiting and posting on his site for years before I was invited back on 666

[edit on 24-8-2006 by probedbygrays]



posted on Aug, 24 2006 @ 08:28 PM
link   

Originally posted by Diplomat

Originally posted by sigung86
Oooops!!! Time to get out of here before someone can't provide evidence of what they are touting, and someone says something silly, and someone draws a red card.

C ya around. This whole thread just went lame...

Well I think it is better this way. Someone needs to call these people on their B.S. or at least ask for more information/evidence. You will see people like Timeseer who simply doesn't want to say anything more. That is fine, it just doesn't help us believe the crazy stuff he is talking about...

I think it is better to get to the bottom of these people's outrageous claims before a bunch of people waste hours of their day reading crazy stories that might actually be completely made up by some guy with an internet connection and too much imaginative time on their hands...


And the moderators should have banned you already for trolling, spamming, and breaking so many rules left and right.

By the way I'm putting you on ignore since you haven't contribute to anything other than ridicule since you first got here. Thanks for being such an anti-diplomat. You really are living up to the opposite of your name.



posted on Aug, 25 2006 @ 05:20 AM
link   
One startling bit of truth is that Whitley Strieber in terror killed the only real alien that actually appeared physically on the 3D earth plane for him.

Normally he slips into an altered hypnogogic state while relaxing in bed or on a chair and then he perceives beings in the finer ethereal type realms. He regularly went out late at night searching through the woods for his alien lover until his energy wore out and as he slipped into an altered state his lover would appear and he would carry her on his back and commune with her.

Some types of Natives slip into the same altered state when they dance wildly until their energy wears out and their focus on the 3D earth plane fades significantly.

But one night while laying in bed an alien insect began physically crawling up his body to his neck and he became terrified. He wrote telling people about it wondering what he should do. I quickly wrote telling him that he is being tested to see if he can endure real physical contact with aliens in the 3D world, and that they were sending their smallest most harmless member first. If he was able to endure the contact then the larger insect and other aliens would appear physically for him in the 3D and he would learn more about reality. I said it was simply a harmless test and he must show love and not fear if he is to pass.

However he simply asked a priest what to do and the priest told him to grab the alien and plunge it into salt to kill it. So that is what Whitley did straight away. And that was as close as Whitley ever got to actual 3D aliens in the earth realm. They came to him and tested him and he failed the test miserably.

But he writes damn good fiction if you are into that stuff.



posted on Sep, 2 2006 @ 09:36 PM
link   
What happened to whitley strieber is basically this: He had some guests stay overnight at his cabin. A huge hulk of a man and a tiny petite woman. They slept in the guest room. During the night whitley was taken by a tiny female elf to her domain where she exclaimed that his genitals were extremely large. Obviously she wanted to make whitley feel that he had a tiny girlfriend also. Thereafter followed many years where whitley and the little elf woman tried to have a child together, the details of which are in a somewhat recent journal.

Oh and he was also probed in the butt and frightened in order to balance the good vibes with some evil.

But the elves also tried to educate him about various aspects of multidimensional reality, which he failed to grasp. Eventually the elves decided to manifest as golden haired humans to reprogram whitley's mind and ween him off the elves and back onto human beings.

The only witness to whitley's encounter with the tiny female elf was the tiny woman sleeping in the guest room with the giant hulk of a man. She said she awoke and heard tiny footsteps in whitley's room that night.

So it was just the elves trying to make whitley feel like a big virile man that's all; like the hulk sleeping with the tiny woman in his guest room that night.

Elves are always trying to be helpful but they do steal babies at times just like the aliens, and that is because they are one and the same.




whitley interview

bizarre



[edit on 2-9-2006 by probedbygrays]



posted on Sep, 2 2006 @ 10:38 PM
link   
I didnt read the others posts, but i will tell you this.

Whitley Striber is a jackars of enormous proportions.

I emailed him once, something to do about Art Bell, and he wrote me a nasty email that i did not deserve.

He's a bipolar jackars that thinks has been implanted...so he could write a book/books and rake in lots of $$$$$$$$




posted on Sep, 5 2006 @ 11:37 AM
link   

Originally posted by dgtempe

He's a bipolar jackars that thinks has been implanted...so he could write a book/books and rake in lots of $$$$$$$$



Hi DG' ... The unfortunate thing is that there are a large number of well known people, whom I suspect are in it for the notoriety, and the money.

I've always had a rule of thumb about things like that ... When in doubt, follow the money. It will invariably get you to the "root cause".


Sadly, it makes it very tough on the people who truly believe, and just as tough on us skeptics, who would like to.




top topics



 
1
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join