It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Scientific Evidence of UFO's

page: 1
0
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 20 2006 @ 03:53 AM
link   
I have been reviewing documentaries about aliens, UFO's etc and come across this documentary that intrigued me greatly.

A scientist, David Sereda i think, makes his case for the existence of UFO's and has some amazing footage of intelligent UFO moving in space.

Its better then anything i've ever seen and it shocked me alot that i haven't heard more about this documentary. Im sorry if this doc. has come up before, but if its been forgotten why? If its just not in the public conciousness then here it is take a look and let me know what you guys think.

www.jonhs.net...




posted on Aug, 20 2006 @ 04:03 AM
link   
Anyone know where i can find part 2?



posted on Aug, 20 2006 @ 04:13 AM
link   

Anyone know where i can find part 2?

Click "Part 2" on the page with the first part...



posted on Aug, 20 2006 @ 04:20 AM
link   
lol thx cant believe i didnt see that!



posted on Sep, 3 2006 @ 10:52 AM
link   
Come on ATS has anyone watched this????????????

This guy offers real scientific proof of the existence of aliens ive heard of nothing to discredit his evidence isnt anybody interested??????????



posted on Sep, 3 2006 @ 11:16 AM
link   
I guess we all have seen this now so calm down friend.
Yes it's very good and aliens are visiting earth, but most people give a damn.



posted on Sep, 3 2006 @ 11:25 AM
link   
Which is why i have posted this on ATS where people do give a damn. If everyone has seen it then who wants to discuss it validity, does anyone know of any evidence to support this.

And with evidence this strong why is everyone ignoring it and posting about hoax ufo sightings i just dont get it!!



posted on Sep, 3 2006 @ 11:31 AM
link   

Originally posted by Argos
with evidence this strong why is everyone ignoring it


Hi Argos,

If you go to the top of this webpage, you will see a button with "Google Search" on it. To the left of that button is a text box, and a number of options (including "ATS", which is selected by default).

If you put the words "Sereda" and "Nasa" into the text box and press the "Google Search" button, you will find numerous discussions of the relevant documentary which have already occured on ATS.

No-one is ignoring the video.

Many of us have seen it, and discussed it, before.

All the best,

Isaac

[edit on 3-9-2006 by IsaacKoi]



posted on Sep, 3 2006 @ 11:32 AM
link   

Originally posted by Argos
And with evidence this strong why is everyone ignoring it and posting about hoax ufo sightings i just dont get it!!

Soon there will come people in this thread and discredit all those videos, even this one:
media.putfile.com...

Some people just don't want to believe even if they have evidence, they'll just try to find stupid reasons for these videos to be showing dust and such and then believe in that.



posted on Sep, 3 2006 @ 02:08 PM
link   

Originally posted by TrappedSoul
Some people just don't want to believe even if they have evidence, they'll just try to find stupid reasons for these videos to be showing dust and such and then believe in that.


Don't want to believe? Let me ask you this - why is believing something GOOD? Isn't it better for the thing to just be true? And yes, I think that "object suddenly appearing" is just some space junk/dust coming into light and being out of focus. I saw nothing in that vid that said, "space alien who builds and pilots interstellar craft".

But hey, maybe it's because I don't harbor a belief that's making me see things most people don't see.



posted on Sep, 3 2006 @ 02:32 PM
link   
Argos,

I've pointed out on other threads that the segments entitled "High Speed Turn" and "Hypervelocity object" both are caused by a zooming of the camera and are misinterpreted by Sereda. You can see these segments at 35:25 - 45:54 on Part 1.



posted on Sep, 3 2006 @ 02:33 PM
link   

Originally posted by Sophismata
I saw nothing in that vid that said, "space alien who builds and pilots interstellar craft".


Nor I. It mostly stems from people not being able to interpret the data. People see "lights" and dont realize the camera is only trying to convey what it "sees" to the CCD, and the compression of such footage doesnt help. The images you see on NASA footage have very little to do with the actual event, had you been standing there.

Many of the objects said to be "pulsing" for instance, are small debris (ice, in many cases) tumbling and catching more light from the camera's viewpoint. The pixelation of the data and transfer of it, makes this "pulsing" effect.



posted on Sep, 3 2006 @ 02:40 PM
link   
I think the film would be much more compelling if Ackroyd had been dressed in his Conehead costume.



[edit on 2006/9/3 by GradyPhilpott]



posted on Sep, 3 2006 @ 03:15 PM
link   
I'm still working my way through this but it seems really excellent, one of the best documentaries I've seen. I think I've seen a cut-down, dumbed-down version of some of the footage here before but this presenter/analyst makes some great points.



posted on Sep, 3 2006 @ 03:24 PM
link   

Originally posted by lost_shaman
Argos,

I've pointed out on other threads that the segments entitled "High Speed Turn" and "Hypervelocity object" both are caused by a zooming of the camera and are misinterpreted by Sereda. You can see these segments at 35:25 - 45:54 on Part 1.

I actually agree



posted on Sep, 3 2006 @ 03:34 PM
link   

Originally posted by Sophismata
And yes, I think that "object suddenly appearing" is just some space junk/dust coming into light

But when they are searching for MIR this happens all over the place, and that's why I think something weird is going on.

And all of you:
And no, these videos didn't make me believe, not any video, I belive because of other reasosns. Actually... I know.
But these videos are good and is supporting what I believe.



posted on Sep, 3 2006 @ 04:01 PM
link   
It's like hearing someone say "Hey guys I just found scientific evidence of an 'internet'. Finally we have proof, instead of just speculation and videos. Aren't I amazing?"



posted on Sep, 4 2006 @ 12:22 PM
link   
Somebody knows what's the official explanation coming from NASA for the Tether sequence, where some objects seems to pass behind it?



posted on Sep, 4 2006 @ 02:28 PM
link   
I think this was an amazing video... watched both parts many times. He is not some crackhead and his information is compelling. Thank you for posting this.

~Candyman~



posted on Sep, 4 2006 @ 08:00 PM
link   
I enjoyed the videos. To Sereda’s credit, almost every time I felt he was stepping out on a limb, he managed to back up his speculation with quantifiable data. Personally, this made the ending’s wild speculation a bit more tolerable.



new topics

top topics



 
0
<<   2 >>

log in

join