posted on Nov, 2 2003 @ 07:49 PM
Originally posted by ALLEGIANCE
Unassuming White Guy<
so your saying there buring the forest to save the condor . wtf are you talking about
what do you have that realy contributes to this topic other than bashing other posters & making up some bull# about condors
TC=super moderator of bull#
No, moron. I have no doubt your limited knowledge and juvenile state causes you a painful lack of knowledge. I'll try and explain this slowly, so
that even the special ones of us can understand.
Enviro-freaks create stupid and dangerous situations that run counter-active to what they claim they are wanting. It isn't merely homes of the rich
that are put in jeapardy, but also the very creatures these mental midgets claim to protect, such as the Condor. You see, you little knowledgeless
eater of food and waster of space, the Condor, like anything else, must be able to find food. When the food is hidden under an unnaturally thick
underbrush, the bird starves. This was created by the eco-freaks. The same type of eco-freaks that demand the forests be kept clear of any type of
logging, while at the same time every little fire is put out. This, you little smartarse with no mental horsepower to back it up, creates these
horrendous situtations. And, even with backfire making capabilities, such as depicted in the pictures in this thread (although the misinformer tries
to make it appear to be a conspiracy), thousands of acreas burn clean up to the tops of the tress, dozens of people die, countless critters burn to
death, and many homes are lost.
And you know what the funny thing is? The dumbasses who can't stand the thoughts of a tree being cut for profit caused thousands and thousands of
trees to burn up without any profit, neither in income to families or companies, nor to humanity in the form of house-building lumber, tables, chairs
or anything else.
There. Was that simplistic enough even for the moronic of us to understand? I doubt it, but I cannot lower myself to grunting and hand-gesters.
[Edited on 2-11-2003 by Thomas Crowne]