I floated this theory to Alex, let me share it with all of you. (this is what my novel - The Last Prophet is about)
U.S. will attack U.S. troops in Iraq with chemical weapons. (blame it on Iran)
1) this will vindicate Bush for the missing WMD's in Iraq - and bump his ratings
2) this will guarantee a nuclear strike on Iran. - PNAC requirement
A) British terrorism was testing an overseas attack - (National guard called in, in U.S. - we passed)
B) Military has been shorting US casualties in Iraq - lots of free dead bodies they can attach to a false-flag
C) US troop loss will justify the Draft - PNAC requirement
D) Chemical attack will justify a nuclear retaliation - PNAC requirement
E) DU posioning cover-up - will help cover years of DU posioning
F) Less complicated - 911 had too many mistakes, overseas would guarantee concealment
G) Military attack may justify Martial Law
H) Nothing more horrifying than massive troop loss - years of Pro-troop media would cause a frenzy of patriotizm.
Grim, I know, that's why I call it the most "Vial Betrayal Ever Conceived".
I hope I'm wrong, but it seems compelling to me.
Wherever they hit, it's going to be bloody - It will be alot easier to control overseas, and they have free dead bodies. And it will help their
agenda better than a strike on US soil.
A strike in the US would help dismantle the Constitution better, but a draft would help create martial law better... depends on what they're shooting