We tend to see what we want to see.

LOL, some of you guy's comments are outrageous.

I have it from secret sources that 3 pairs of hamsters escaped from a Mars mission back in the 1950s. It is believed that because Mars has no atmosphere to protect from radiation and no predators they mutated into a species of giant sand hamsters. The rest of what you see in the pictures are giant sand hamster droppings. Additionally they have become semi-intelligent.

I can't reveal anymore because I am currently being held captive on a sand hamster space ship, part of an invading armada, bent on revenge for stranding them there in the first place. All I can tell you is they plan on setting up their initial base in Death Valley California. Pray for me guys.

PS. Keep Sunflower seeds close at hand for bribery purposes. I ran out.

[edit on 10-7-2004 by slank]

This is very bad science, as a geologist I can say these features are natural, a nose? I think not

As it was explained to me...

Basicly Mars was dying but they had some time to experiment. So they dropped off Apes, chimps, and other life forms created from our DNA to see how they would adapt to Earth - they sent lots of them in order to get a good sampling. When that experiment paid off, they dropped off a creature quite simmilar to the missing link that the evolutionists are looking for, Since they just had to see if that creature would last it's normal life span, it was sterilised before it was dropped off - this was done so that Humans didn't have to confront it or be hunted by it - additionally they didn't have to drop off a lot of them - which is why the missing link hasn't been found.

When that experiment concluded they started moving the population from mars to here including animals . (Thus accounting for the INCAN drawings of people flying in ships, as well as other "Space craft" drawings through out history).

Don't know how vaild the whole thing is, but it is interesting mental candy.... Enjoy

i do believe that there is probably more to mars than we are told but those images don't prove anything!

.

I couldnt agree more. I cant see sh**! Of course I am not a photo review expert by any means.

One thing that I might suggest is that if you start pointing out items in photos that are apparent(to you), maybe use some type of editor "Photoshop, etc" to point out what your are talking about.

Most of us have no clue what it is we are looking at. Well at least I don't.

I am not an expert on search engine placement but I do have a lot of experience with web developement. I do web developement commercially for an major insurance brokerage and we have issues trying to get good placement on the major search engines as well. Its difficult(without paying) to get into the top 10 of any of them.

I know the major search engines do allow for you to to "Pay" for placement. Google is the champ at this and so I will use them as the example.

Once Google is finished displaying all of the links relevant to your search that have paid money(and this could be dozens mind you) then they start displaying the URL's for the reast of the smucks out there.

They way they decide who comes up after they paying customers if very complicated and Patented, but basically they search for key words in the url, the webpage, and metadata. Also relevancy of the content on the page to the search criteria is considered heavely as well.

This is the 10 cent tour of Search Engine placement. It is much more complicated then that.

Each search engine is different and so are their algorithims, so it would make sense that your site comes up in different places on all of the search engines.

There are applications that you can buy(very expesive) that will analysis your site, site pages, and structure and make recommendations on how to build your page. The way you structure your website is very important for web placement on search engines as well.

I have never heard(but not out side of the realm of possibility) of someone being able to pay to "filter" someone elses site. People pay big bucks to have their web site show up before yours though.

I have heard of countries banning search engines from their people because of the free information available that they did not want their people to have access to(China is a good example), but havnt heard of that here (again might be happening).

What is sounds like to me is that you have to spend more time with constructing you site and really focusing on Search Engine placement. There are alot of forums out there that can get you started.

Although I think that some items maybe censored on these search engines, I really dont think that is what is happening here. If this was they case I can think of a hundred sites that(like this one) that would be filtered before yours.

You can U2U me for more info or to extend the dicussion on search placement.



[edit on 16-3-2007 by perfectdeception]

[edit on 16-3-2007 by perfectdeception]

[edit on 16-3-2007 by perfectdeception]

First post should be edited and thread closed, the links are all dead now.