It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Jimmy Carter, Spiegel Interview

page: 1
0

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 17 2006 @ 08:52 AM
link   

SPIEGEL INTERVIEW WITH JIMMY CARTER

"The US and Israel Stand Alone"

Former US president Jimmy Carter speaks with DER SPIEGEL about the danger posed to American values by George W. Bush, the difficult situation in the Middle East and Cuba's ailing Fidel Castro.


service.spiegel.de...



Carter: Under all of its predecessors there was a commitment to peace instead of preemptive war. Our country always had a policy of not going to war unless our own security was directly threatened and now we have a new policy of going to war on a preemptive basis.


This, above all else, is why I have serious issues with Bush&Co. GW opened up a huge can of worms.

[edit on 17-8-2006 by mecheng]
mod edit to use external quote code, please review this link

[edit on 17-8-2006 by DontTreadOnMe]




posted on Aug, 17 2006 @ 09:12 AM
link   
Here are a couple more points I tend to agree with...



We've never had an administration before that so overtly and clearly and consistently passed tax reform bills that were uniquely targeted to benefit the richest people in our country at the expense or the detriment of the working families of America.


Yeah, but thanks for the couple hundred dollars in tax credit GW. I think I bought some groceries.




I don't think that Israel has any legal or moral justification for their massive bombing of the entire nation of Lebanon. What happened is that Israel is holding almost 10,000 prisoners, so when the militants in Lebanon or in Gaza take one or two soldiers, Israel looks upon this as a justification for an attack on the civilian population of Lebanon and Gaza. I do not think that's justified, no.




This administration has not attempted at all in the last six years to negotiate or attempt to negotiate a settlement between Israel and any of its neighbors or the Palestinians.




The (christian) fundamentalists believe they have a unique relationship with God, and that they and their ideas are God's ideas and God's premises on the particular issue. Therefore, by definition since they are speaking for God anyone who disagrees with them is inherently wrong. And the next step is: Those who disagree with them are inherently inferior, and in extreme cases -- as is the case with some fundamentalists around the world -- it makes your opponents sub-humans, so that their lives are not significant.


Explains a lot.



after Sept., there was an outburst in America of intense suffering and patriotism, and the Bush administration was very shrewd and effective in painting anyone who disagreed with the policies as unpatriotic or even traitorous.


Part of the agenda.

Funny that I never really liked Carter back in the day (I was pretty young however). He seems to be more effective out of office than he was in. The points he makes in the interview make sense. I may even go buy his book.

mod edit to use external quote code, please review this link




[edit on 17-8-2006 by DontTreadOnMe]



posted on Aug, 18 2006 @ 08:12 PM
link   
Carter siding with terrorist?

Who would have thought that?


If you want to see how a Democrat President would handle terrorists, all you have to do is look how Carter handled the Iran-Hostage situation.



new topics
 
0

log in

join