posted on Aug, 17 2006 @ 01:47 PM
well a couple things, first off nightwalker your link doesnt work...sorry i cant see it for some reason, maybe i dont have full quicktime...now
something struck me in this post said by capt lazy . he said that there was no SOUND of any bombs going off in the building, a point that was later
challenged. well i am not a CD expert, but i am an audio expert seeing as im an audio engineer by trade.
the fact that no explosions could be heard, is actually quite a strong peice of evidence that there may have not been bombs in the building after all.
Take footage shot from under the towers or close to the towers as the fell...there was no explosions, even muffled booms, there was a crack, which in
my opinion was the tower top part breaking off and starting to fall.
Also take the idea of sound...ok everything in life makes a sound..now for them to explode a building with no sound, they would have to plant the
charges on the interior of the building, and then soundproof the outer exterior of the building.
can you immagine that?? you'd have to have people working for months on the interior of the building, carfully placeing explosives without any
workers, tourists or the bomb sniffing dogs find them. either that, or you'd have to make a silent bomb. what bomb, or charge, do you know that is
silent?? i dont think one exists, i could be wrong...but i've never heard of a silent bomb...even audio bombs resonate sound at some level, and those
arent your typical bomb.
so then if you cant get a silent bomb, and lets say u DID manage to rig the explosions from the interior of the building, how are you gonna stop the
sound from escaping out and not causing any audio or vibration to escape the building? you'd have to sound proof the entire building so that no sound
heard from inside would be able to escape it.
that means coating the entire building, exterior and probly some interior, with sound proof material. yes all 1,110 stories with sound proof matieral,
and again...without anybody even seeing this. Even if you somehow did this unimaginable feat, it still wouldnt work because the damage zones would
have had the sound proofing blown off and thus some sound would have inevitably escaped anyway.
and even if u get a silent charge or detonation or whatever, how do you explain the building not falling from the bottom, down? someone said the
debris was falling weird...if you notice, the debris is falling outward, not inward. everything is being pushed out, which does go along with the
theory that the building was collapsing in on itself, and the force was pushing ruble outward.
ok and lets say u CAN take that building down from the tom to bottom, how are u gonna account for the damage zones? any charges from the damage zones,
would have been completley useless. maybe even some higher than the damage zones might have been usless because they could have sustained damage.
and the footage of that plane, hate to tell you doesnt convince me at all. considering that virtually every eye witness saw the plane flying to the
building before it even hit and a great number of others saw the plane on live tv, i cant belive for one second that was a missle. especially since
that video is slowed down frame by frame, it's not fully accurate. watch the video on full speed and you see yes the building does eat the plane, but
theres a huge explosion as the plane blows up.
there was a giant, firey, hole in the building. a scyscraper is a very delicate peice of work, you have tons, literally thousands of pounds, of steel
and concrete above the impact zone, you dont think that will weaken the building? especially considering that peices of steel and concrete needed to
keep that upper part of the building on and balance the weight of other floors, were either severley damaged, or completley blown away. It's not like
the plane just took out some concrete and a skeleton was left, an entire section was completley missing