It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SteveR
The SMART-1 was not in orbit.
If left on the course of its lunar orbit, SMART-1 would have naturally hit the Moon on 17 August 2006 on the lunar far side, not visible from Earth.
A 2-week series of manoeuvres started on 19 June and concluded on 2 July allowed SMART-1 to adjust its orbit to avoid having the spacecraft intersect with the Moon at a disadvantageous time from the scientific point of view, and to obtain a useful small mission ‘extension’.
When a spacecraft orbits around the Moon, as SMART-1 does, it is doomed by the law of gravity. Tugs from the Sun, the Earth, and irregularities in the Moon itself, all disturb its orbit. Sooner or later, any lunar orbiter will impact the Moon surface unless it has very big amounts of fuel left to be re-boosted and escape the lunar gravity.
Originally posted by Apass
You should do a better search and try to understand what to orbit means
A geosynchronous orbit is a geocentric orbit that has the same orbital period as the sidereal rotation period of the Earth. It has a semi-major axis of 42,164 km (26,200 miles). In the special case of the geostationary orbit, an observer on the ground would not perceive the satellite as moving and would see it as a fixed point in the sky. Such orbits are useful for telecommunications relays. In the more general case, when the orbit has some inclination and/or eccentricity, the satellite would appear to describe a more or less distorted figure-eight in the sky, and would rest above the same spots of the Earth's surface once per sidereal day.
wikipedia
(my emphesis)
Originally posted by pepsi78
okay this is just too much, do you know what the term of geo means?
It means it's fixed on a geographic position, and it will rotate along with that position and not around the earth.
You are talking about another thing, that is low orbiting and not geostational, low orbiting is used like a sling-shoot you, pick up speed due to the mass of gravity, geostational satelites like the TV satelites do not move around the earth, but with the earth.
does the word stationary means anything to you?
Originally posted by cmdrkeenkid
Originally posted by pepsi78
okay this is just too much, do you know what the term of geo means?
It means it's fixed on a geographic position, and it will rotate along with that position and not around the earth.
You are talking about another thing, that is low orbiting and not geostational, low orbiting is used like a sling-shoot you, pick up speed due to the mass of gravity, geostational satelites like the TV satelites do not move around the earth, but with the earth.
does the word stationary means anything to you?
Did somebody else type that for you? Your grammer and spelling just got thousands of times better than previous posts... I thought English wasn't your first language?
Originally posted by SteveR
Alright, so no orbit can be long term and consistent unless it is geosync?
Originally posted by pepsi78
trust me, it isnt.
Originally posted by apc
It would if [geostational] were a word. But since you say English is not your first language, we'll let that slide.
In the special case of the geostationary orbit, an observer on the ground would not perceive the satellite as moving and would see it as a fixed point in the sky.
Originally posted by pepsi78
Dear Apass
okay this is just too much, do you know what the term of geo means?
It means it's fixed on a geographic position, and it will rotate along with that position and not around the earth.
You are talking about another thing, that is low orbiting and not geostational, low orbiting is used like a sling-shoot you, pick up speed due to the mass of gravity, geostational satelites like the TV satelites do not move around the earth, but with the earth.
does the word stationary means anything to you?