It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by DYepes
To express hate for these people is horribly prejudiced because it is expressing hate for people who are simply uneducated on our customs and trying to get away from horrible life.
[edit on 8/16/2006 by DYepes]
Originally posted by apc
That doesn't sound right. If the charges were dropped, the only thing that should be on her record is the arrest. Arrests are not visible on background checks. Only law enforcement has access to that information.
Originally posted by DYepes
Adding states peacefully can float our nations economy a lot better than war with countries on the other side of the globe. Think about how much of that countries buildings will have to be demolished and rebuilt just to come up to code? Man the taxes from that # will be an awesome addition to our economy. Who would not love being able to travel to Cancun within our own country
Originally posted by MrPenny
Directly from the Consititution of the United States;
nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws...
That is unequivocal.....citizen, immigrant, illegal immigrant, whatever, all are afforded the same protections and rights outlined in the Constitution and Bill of Rights.
If you deny that, you do not understand the concepts framing this country and you are a biased, prejudiced person.
Originally posted by WyrdeOne
How am I, a landlord, supposed to verify the immigration status of my tenants? I have no authority to investigate their immigration status, under current federal law, right?
Originally posted by Escrotumus
Next time I recommend pasting the ENTIRE contents of the amendment and not twisting it to suit your own biased needs. If your interpretation of this amendment were accurate don't you think that these leeches would have already used it to further their continuing rape and pillage of this country?
Nice try. Thank you, but the section in its entirety does nothing to alter the meaning of the snippet I posted. No 'twisting' is necessary. It is still unequivocal.
If my attitude that every man, woman, and child is subject to, and enjoys the rights and protections afforded by this country's governing documents can be described as 'biased', within the same paragraph in which they are described as 'leeches'....God help you.
Originally posted by Escrotumus
Here in the 3rd dimension in the US, that passage is accurately described as providing rights to citizens of the United States. There is no play on words and it is not open for further clarification.
Originally posted by apc
Justice must be served. They have a right to a fair and speedy trial. They have a right to a lawyer.
Originally posted by apc
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
What does this mean?
Your absolutely right. Nor does it exclude any specific rights from any specific group. That is the importance of the section, the language that states no person can have their life, liberty, or property deprived by any state, or that any person can be denied equal protection of the law.
You appear to understand that there is no "play on words" here, yet you seem to be reading a farcicial screenplay instead of the solemn text I'm reading.
I am utterly confident that my interpretation is the correct one, mostly in that it recognizes human dignity and rights. Where I find your interpretation to be sordid, biased, and shameful.
The idea that illegal immigrants are somehow causing us, citizens, some kind of hardship is ludicrous. The huge grocery stores, often three or four next door to each other, are some kind of illusion I suppose. And the electronics stores with the 50" televisions and smart refrigerators are simply to impress the visitors I guess. How about the SUVs and trucks whizzing down the interstate at 80 mph while the driver whines to his wife on the hands free cell phone camera about the high price of gas?
"70% of Americans want the illegal immigrants shipped back"......stow it. That just means 70% of Americans are completely willing to follow along with what they think the neighbors think. Look at what's popular on television and music. Damning evidence that many people in this country are braindead sheep willing to be lead around by whatever 'issue' the PTB cares to focus on today.
Staggering numbers of people around the globe are at risk from dirty water, dirty food, dirty homes, dirty hospitals, no hospitals, no food, no homes, yet the well-fed indignant jump up and down in this country about how we're being shat on by illegal immigrants. That is shameful.
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside.