Originally posted by Durden
Fairer, certainly. Though hardly accurate.
No less accurate than your initial analogy.
That makes little sense, Koka.
Well, the T&Cs say "You will not post any material that is knowingly false, misleading, or inaccurate".
Chris didn't post anything here, yet the request for an interview is being presented as if he had.
I have a recollection of a game that started here, which was initialised with a photo of a UFO being chased by a jet(s). Someone wanted help verifying
So it started off as a falicy and then was found to be a staged event, why, on that occasion, were we willing to be taken in by ATS, someone posted,
knowingly, a fake image but it was accepted although it went against the ATS T&Cs.
I'm trying to find the thread concerned.
That would also have been accomplished had he been sincere from the get-go.
Not really, you would have people saying "They are so obviously fake" or words to that affect, based solely on preserving their pride and
credibility. The aim was to show that even self proclaimed experts have no idea what is real and what is fake.
Lets face it, I can claim that every piece of footage ever submitted is fake, and not be proved wrong.
UFOlogy is a pseudoscience, akin to Ghosthunting and Astrology, in all the years I've been looking at photos and videos, I have never concluded that
it was evidence and probably won't until the day I have an experience of my own.
[edit on 20-8-2006 by Koka]