It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
We still do not have Tesla's first over unity device on the market and that's been around for over a century.
Do you not understand the forces ranged against these types of technologies?
So basically a man with a few degrees already will pay money to accept another one? Tell me how accepting a degree for prior work is somehow illegal or at all relevant to this discussion? How does this invalidate his life's work and other degrees? What a lame attempted hatchet job this is turning out to be!
The issues are not connected and there are enough information available on the MEG to replicate it as far as i know.
Unless this dense signal environment and its phasing is carefully adjusted so that the phases are generally additive, COP > 1.0 is not possible, obviously, since it means no effective NET energy input occurs from the activated external environment, even though LOTS of excess energy is being radiated back into the MEG. One doesn’t seek and cannot use just a “noise” energy input from that external environment! One must have some coherence, so that the external environment inputs some usable free EM energy. So to go from the business of slow, painful hand adjustment of the phasing to automatic optimization is certainly a “doable”, but it is not a simple EE problem.
Yea right who is "one" that you are referring to??? I know that I did not make such statements. Yet here we are discussing "scaler weapons".
Well i am trying to stay on topic but this normally happens when one suggests that the USA is not a few thousands percent cooler and more heavily armed than everyone else put together.
WOW so much for staying on topic!!! You don't have a clue what you are talking about you just like to rant against the US and attack anyone that doesn't share your destorted views.
You would think that the average American worker would notice how they can buy less and less, working longer hours while watching all their manufacturing jobs goes overseas, and wonder what is wrong when their military and bureaucrats fail to ensure at least that much for them? Are the clear economic decline of America really a logical and expected sign of it's supposed supremacy?
Tom Bearden is today known as the self styled expert on over-unity physics. That is to say, electrical systems that put more energy out than goes in. However, this position of pre-eminence, has been achieved not by the conventional means of publishing papers in peer reviewed journals, attending mainstream scientific conferences, or even providing working demonstrations, but rather by playing to the crank fringe audience on the internet, with a sustained and substantial publicity effort that now exceeds 10 years in duration.
What has made the rise of Mr Bearden possible, has been the general absence of critical discussion of his methods and concepts. This is not surprising, since Mr Bearden has consistently kept away from those who are qualified to evaluate his claims, and prefers instead to keep company only with those who are uncritical in accepting his statements of knowledge.
Essentially, Mr Bearden is arguing over-unity is only possible with antiquated second rate equipment, in poorly equipped labs. Any attempt to use modern scientific equipment, accurate sensors, proper wire, measuring apparatus, or other standard lab equipment, will ruin the effect. The reader is left to ponder the consequences of this, as Mr Bearden’s stubborn belief that functional modern equipment kills off over-unity performance, may have relevance in terms of understanding his later researches.
In the conclusion, we are offered another fascinating and at the same time highly disturbing insight into the mind of Tom Bearden. Now, keep in mind, the above paper was total nonsense. No working product, or anything even remotely resembling a working product was ever developed using it, however, Mr Bearden ends his paper thus:
‘Well, there you have it. I've given you the benefit of what required most of my adult life to discover. The definitions advanced in this paper are rigorous. It took years of sweat and tears to come up with them. They're simple, but they will change your entire understanding of electromagnetics, power, and energy once you grasp them. Please read them, and ponder them, several times. One or two readings will not be sufficient to fully grasp what is said here.
Also, hopefully by this time the reader is beginning to experience the same emotions as I experienced when I finally discovered how simple it all really was. First one wants to laugh for about two hours at how truly ignorant we've all been. Then one wants to cry for about two hours for the same reason. This could all have been done a century ago, if we had ever really understood electromagnetics.’
Bearden began by asking me if I knew what Newton's Third Law was. I answered that I thought it was the 'action-reaction' law, which he agreed that it was. He then began saying that the present electromagnetics is flawed because it violates that Newtonian law. That we do detect transverse waves, but only in the electron gas of our antennnas and instrument probes. That 'not one of the equations attributed to Maxwell were actually written by him' etc., etc. Having read three of his books and all of his papers as downloaded from the BBS's, I'd heard these phrases many times before. I understood the phrases. Bearden knew who I was by now, and therefore didn't need to keep parroting them every time we talked. What I wanted to know was, how does the longitudinal propagation theory account for the known fact that EM waves are polarized one way or another, and so your receiving antenna's polarization (or, ORIENTATION) must match that of the transmitter for optimum reception.
That's all I wanted to know. I just wanted Bearden to explain polarization in terms of his longitudinal model. Evidently I pissed him off. He told me that I was just regurgitating what "they" had taught me in the standard electromagnetics courses. That I shouldn't believe them. That I should read and re-read his books to get straightened out on these points.
I felt he was evading my question. I was asking about polarization. If he didn't know the answer, or if he hadn't considered the question before, or even if he didn't feel like talking to me about it, he could have politely told me so. I would have accepted that. Everyone who has a theory is allowed to develop it. Rome wasn't built in a day.
Next, Tom Bearden was attempting to tell me that polarization itself was "a bunch of bullsh*t"! Trying to get a word in edgewise, while trying to remain polite (after all, I was making the phone call, intruding on his time), I reminded him that his books didn't deal with polarization. He said he didn't have to, because it was all bullsh*t. That I needed to think (emphasis his), and that if I were really paying attention to what he was saying, I would understand and wouldn't be asking these illogical questions!
Originally posted by Heckman
LOL and what device is that?? The "black box?? Where has it been around for over a century?? Any evidence?? Anything at all outside of hearsay? Hearsay is not proof.. nor is speculation..
Yes there are "forces at work" however con artist simply point to this anytime they fail to produce a device.
They prey on people like yourself that will believe something just because you read it on Tom Bearden's website. You auto discount any and all opposing information without even studying it.
Are you so blind??? Why would someone need a fake PhD unless they are trying to use it for fraud??
No actually Bearden claims that the MEG will not work unless its "specially tuned" and he has never told how this is accomplished.
Yea right who is "one" that you are referring to??? I know that I did not make such statements. Yet here we are discussing "scaler weapons".
WOW so much for staying on topic!!! You don't have a clue what you are talking about you just like to rant against the US and attack anyone that doesn't share your destorted views.
Originally posted by Zaphod58
This page does a good job of analyzing Bearden and his claims.
Tom Bearden is today known as the self styled expert on over-unity physics.
That is to say, electrical systems that put more energy out than goes in. However, this position of pre-eminence, has been achieved not by the conventional means of publishing papers in peer reviewed journals, attending mainstream scientific conferences,
or even providing working demonstrations,
but rather by playing to the crank fringe audience on the internet, with a sustained and substantial publicity effort that now exceeds 10 years in duration.
What has made the rise of Mr Bearden possible, has been the general absence of critical discussion of his methods and concepts.
This is not surprising, since Mr Bearden has consistently kept away from those who are qualified to evaluate his claims,
and prefers instead to keep company only with those who are uncritical in accepting his statements of knowledge.
Essentially, Mr Bearden is arguing over-unity is only possible with antiquated second rate equipment, in poorly equipped labs.
Any attempt to use modern scientific equipment, accurate sensors, proper wire, measuring apparatus, or other standard lab equipment, will ruin the effect.
The reader is left to ponder the consequences of this, as Mr Bearden’s stubborn belief that functional modern equipment kills off over-unity performance, may have relevance in terms of understanding his later researches.
In the conclusion, we are offered another fascinating and at the same time highly disturbing insight into the mind of Tom Bearden. Now, keep in mind, the above paper was total nonsense. No working product, or anything even remotely resembling a working product was ever developed using it, however, Mr Bearden ends his paper thus:
. Having read three of his books and all of his papers as downloaded from the BBS's, I'd heard these phrases many times before. I understood the phrases. Bearden knew who I was by now, and therefore didn't need to keep parroting them every time we talked.
What I wanted to know was, how does the longitudinal propagation theory account for the known fact that EM waves are polarized one way or another, and so your receiving antenna's polarization (or, ORIENTATION) must match that of the transmitter for optimum reception.
That's all I wanted to know. I just wanted Bearden to explain polarization in terms of his longitudinal model. Evidently I pissed him off. He told me that I was just regurgitating what "they" had taught me in the standard electromagnetics courses. That I shouldn't believe them. That I should read and re-read his books to get straightened out on these points.
I felt he was evading my question. I was asking about polarization. If he didn't know the answer, or if he hadn't considered the question before, or even if he didn't feel like talking to me about it, he could have politely told me so. I would have accepted that. Everyone who has a theory is allowed to develop it. Rome wasn't built in a day.
Next, Tom Bearden was attempting to tell me that polarization itself was "a bunch of bullsh*t"! Trying to get a word in edgewise, while trying to remain polite (after all, I was making the phone call, intruding on his time), I reminded him that his books didn't deal with polarization. He said he didn't have to, because it was all bullsh*t. That I needed to think (emphasis his), and that if I were really paying attention to what he was saying, I would understand and wouldn't be asking these illogical questions!
]There's a LOT more on that page but I don't want to quote TOO much here. Basically Bearden claims everything written in textbooks is wrong, and he knows the answers to it all, and "redefines" Cancer and AIDS and other diseases.
There is nothing fake about accepting or paying for honoury degrees when you have already done work enough in the field to qualify yourself as such. Where is the evidence that he paid for the degree or that there was any illegal activity involved here? Why do you hate the man so?
So why assume it's hearsay or such when it was experimentally tested and talked about in the press? It's even patented...
We still do not have Tesla's first over unity device on the market and that's been around for over a century.
Which he said had to do with patent issues but here is what Naudin had to say about it after replicating the MEG.
Unfortunately, I have not yet succeeded in the closed loop and in spite of the "apparent" power measured, the RLoad resistor doesn't heat up too much, it is only a bit warm. I think that it still remain a possibility of a measurement artifact ( not a measurement error ). ... A COP >>1 will be fully confirmed only with a closed loop and a self-running device...
Blatant falsehood as the patented MEG easily proves. It's been replicated and other researchers have working models.
Well i am reading his 900 odd page book
Probably should have read the books to start with as then you would not be asking pointless questions. Why make this a issue when it can not alter the reality of observed energy from the vacuum?
Originally posted by Zaphod58
Hey, nice job in pointing the finger at me for quoting a page written by someone else.
I forgot that there's no point in saying anything different from you since you know it all already and we're just ignorant little peons
who only attack what we don't understand and won't bother educating ourselves.
Originally posted by Heckman
Did you follow the story about trinity collage on the page zaphod58 listed??
LOL and here I thought you were talking about the "black box" when you were talking about the Tesla Radiant Energy Device that requires a structure ABOVE THE IONOSPHERE!!!! THATS over 60 miles..
Just to let you know there have not been any structures around for a century thats over 60 miles tall.. If you ever want to learn about real world "free energy" devices that HAVE been around for over a century. Then learn about Stirling engines and their possible new applications for use with Solar , Geo Thermal heat , Radioisotopes ...
YES LETS !!! Jean Naudin:
It clearly hasn't been able to work in closed loop!!!!
REALLY and what reputable researchers is that ??
On this website you can see some explanations as to how when improperly tested the MEG tests for over unity but does not perform in the real world just like what Jean is describing
www.phact.org...
Its clear you have already bought into his BS ... Literally..
If you ever want to come out of your shell and want to learn about Zero Point Energy and the possible REAL conversion of it into usable energy , then get a book called Practical Conversion of Zero-Point Energy by Thomas F. Valone.
Actually he had functioning devices ON earth based on that technology and i am surprised&dismayed to see how easily you dismiss Tesla.
Energy from the vacuum is NOT based on ZPE! I will check out Valone eventually but why bother with extraction energy from ZPE when that's not what any of these devices are based on?
Originally posted by Heckman
The patent has to do with a device to harness possitive charged atmosphere caused by cosmic rays, and the negative charge in the ground. In order to have any large amount of useable energy a structure would have to reach from the ground to above the ionosphere.
Positive particles are stopped at the ionosphere and between it and the negative charges in the ground is a distance of over 60 miles.
*sigh* Zero Point Energy is the REAL energy in an absolute zero vacuum. Mr Beardens devices are based on "waves from the time domain" or in other words, based on the gullibility of people like yourself.
Its people like Bearden that give REAL free energy researchers a bad name.
I'm through with you. Its pointless debating with someone that feels that they know everything yet stumble on the simplest concepts of logic.
Originally posted by StellarX
Mister Bearden's devices do nothing but use some of the OBSERVABLE energy ( ZPE is not observable) that was measured by Maxwell, Heaviside, Poynting, Lorenz and Lorentz.
Originally posted by rogue1
Originally posted by StellarX
Mister Bearden's devices do nothing but use some of the OBSERVABLE energy ( ZPE is not observable) that was measured by Maxwell, Heaviside, Poynting, Lorenz and Lorentz.
ZPE is observable through the Casimir Effect
posted by Russian soldier
First, I'd like to thank pro Russian opinions. The opinions about Russia's army being rusty and falling apart are complete bs . . most importantly, quantity over quality? Nah, I don't think so! While you expected AK-47s, T-72s, Mig-25s . . what you saw in the pictures was something different. This is Russia's new stuff. Russia, like any smart country will work to surprise us, and is gonna avoid showing its stuff. Yes, Russia's whole army isn't composed of the above, but Russia is slowly replacing the old with the new . . Also, there is no doubt that Russia's Spetsnaz is among the best trained, equipped, and in highest numbers in the world.
“ . . no country has yet made an equivalant counterpart to the S400 . . Black Eagle MBT comments: only a few Black Eagles have been made. it will either produce the Black Eagle eventually in good numbers, or make a better tank. Many Su-37's features are unmatched. Not to mention Russia's superb missiles. A book known as "military history of aviation" that I read at the library stated stuff that included "Russia is second to none in aircraft weapons . . Even the original Su-27 was one of the best aircraft and is still the yardstick by which Western aircraft are measured . . the An-94 has a unique 2 round burst with no recoil which is a feature superior to all the other assault rifles mentioned her . . “
US nukes . . more . . But the Topol-M might perhaps break the tie a bit?
It’s obvious Russia is hiding alot from us. Russia may have even more stuff than this. For now, just remember, don't underestimate Russia, and remember that Russia is a great, powerful country. Don't mess with Russia. Oh, and I'm so proud that I will soon be serving the army of this great country. It will be an honor. Alright ya'll, see ya later . . “ [Edited by Don W]
Originally posted by donwhite
The most recent numbers I saw said the Russian Federation is spending $19 billion equivalent annually on its war preparedness. Our side says that is only half the real expenditure. That may be, but it tells me Russians are about 11.97 times as smart as Americans. That being the ratio of 38 to 455. The Russian people are benefitting from the 1991 end of he Cold War. After 3 generations of sacrifice, now that can build a better Russia. But not the American people. After 15 years, our government is still looking for an enemy worthy of this great expenditure. Say obscene. First Afghan, then Iraq and now Lebanon’s Hezbollah seem to be the best we can come up with. If you believed in conspiracies you might think OBL is an operative of the CIA? A commission agent for the much vaunted and often warned against, military industry complex.
Continuing in the vein of comparative armaments, do any of you think we could petition ATS to make a deal with Jane’s to let us “read only” from their vast repertoire ? Say for 6 months on a trial basis?
jwaf.janes.com...
www-cgsc.army.mil...
stinet.dtic.mil...
[edit on 9/16/2006 by donwhite]
Originally posted by zikan42
you'll think differently when they beat the **** out of you in the army. Im russian, and im not scared to admit that russian army is a mess. We have good tech, but no money to produce it. Russia is in no possition to wage a war right now.
Originally posted by Heckman
I personally do not question the quality of Russian fighting equipment. Or the moral of it troops. However I do not think that the form of command that was in place during the cold war would have been very effective in a major conventional conflict against NATO however that has changed ALLOT since then.
People talk about this and about that... What it all comes back to is that Russia ,and the US have possession of the ultimate in warfare technology. The ability to utterly wipe a nation off the face of the earth in a matter of hours.
The real deciding factor on a global military scale. After all the Bull%$#@ is cleared out of the way the fact is that RUSSIA still has a massive amount of Inter Continental Ballistic Missiles equipped with THERMO NUCLEAR WARHEADS..
No mater what you think of Russian tanks or Russian guns or Russian planes.. When it comes to those giant life ending rockets , Russia is still a world superpower.