It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Possibility of doubles?

page: 1

log in


posted on Aug, 14 2006 @ 08:02 PM
I recently ran across some statements that there is a high probability of the hijackers having doubles.

From what I understand eyewitness accounts and information in the Mousssaoui trial do not match up. It seems that Atta was seen drinking in Hollywood, Florida... while he was placed on a flight to Baltimore.

I have yet to dive much further into this. I was just wondering if any of the rest of you guys had heard of this or researched it? I could did not find a discussion on this here. I certainly think that there is a possibility of this.

Any thoughts? Information?

posted on Aug, 16 2006 @ 08:19 PM
Doubles? There is an interesting theory. But I doubt it.

It seems that a number of the 9/11 hijackers have been found to be alive and well, victims of identity theft. However, despite this, the feds still wont remove their name from the list of hijackers.

posted on Aug, 17 2006 @ 11:55 PM
"Text taken from"

People might recall that the presence of Atta and Al Shehhi in Shuckums (Hollywood, FL) on September 7, 2001 posed a big challenges to the official story. Their heavy drinking in this bar has been witnessed by many and widely reported in the media. Yet the Commission Report states that Atta travelled to Baltimore the very same day.

The last flight from Fort Lauderdale (closest airport to Hollywood) to Baltimore took off at 7.30 p.m. If one assumes that all the reportings that have him drinking longer than 7 p.m. are wrong, that he managed 12 miles to the airport in a quarter of an hour and if he was still allowed to check in at 7.15 p.m. and that the reportings of Atta and Al Shehhi in Sarasota the same evening are wrong, too, than the drinking in Shuckums so far was no definite proof that Atta had a double.

This changed now with the publication of the evidences presented in the Moussaoui trial.

Open the one on Atta (OG00020.02 at the bottom of the page)
Here you find now:
On Sep 7 a wire transfer from Al Shehhi's and Atta's account happened on Sep 7 at 15:58.
This pushes the beginning of the drinking to later than 4 p.m. or somehow the alleged hijackers interrupted their session which has not been reported. It gets worse.
Now open the file on Al Shhehi (open OG00020.01 at the bottom of the list). Here you find:
Al Shehhi made on Sep 7 at 16:56 in Deerfield Beach an ATM withdrawal fom Saeed Al Ghamdi's account and was taken on video.

Now, how is this possible. At the very same time he’s supposed to drink in Hollywood which is 20-25 miles away. All reports talk of Atta and Al Shehhi drinking there. If Al Shehhi arrived just after 4 p.m. in Hollywood then he would have had to leave the bar right away in order to drive back to Deerfield Beach (where by the way he was coming from) and could only have returned back to Shuckums around 5.45 p.m. having left Atta alone for 1 ½ hours. All this is in inexplainable contrast to the Atta and Al Shehhi drinking in Shuckums. And I would very much like to see the video footage of Al Shehhi!

It gets even worse.
As officially stated in the already mentioned chronology on Atta he did take Flight 2719 from Fort Lauderdale to Baltimore on September 7, 2001. According to the BTS the plane was scheduled for 3:15 p.m. Therefore Atta is on a flight to Baltimore while he is still witnessed drinking at Shuckums for hours....!
Therefore we can conclude that Atta and most likely Al Shehhi had doubles.

More info on this topic here:
For further information on the alleged hijackers see “Tracking the alleged hijackers and their doubles”.

posted on Aug, 17 2006 @ 11:59 PM
Maybe they are test tube clones bred by the government since birth.

posted on Aug, 19 2006 @ 10:46 PM
Thanks JackHorner! I think that's exactly what I read on another message board.

I certainly do not want to rule out the possibility, but it does seem a bit crazy. When I read this I thought of the TV series Alias.. ya know, when they had the doubles of people using some weird technology. I cannot for the life of me remember much about that though... that part of the show aired quite a while back.

Back on topic: Either way I still believe that the government was involved in 9/11, whether it be directly or indirectly.

posted on Aug, 19 2006 @ 11:05 PM
Doubles have been used a lot throughout history. Saddam had doubles and so did Bin Laden. There are cases of literal doubles (similar in appearance) and even some of Sadam's doubles underwent plastic surgery. In alias, they could actually make someone look identical to someone else along with changing the voice, this is Hollywood; they also had this in mission impossible. This kind of technology is far away. Then there is the case of Lee Harvey Oswald. Many people reported having spoken with him, and said he was talking about communism in a good light, such as at a car dealership. These doubles didn't have to look like him at all and would just claim to be him. It was ment to make him out to be a communist and thus a motive for him to kill the president. So, doubles are quite possible and I wouldn’t put it past the CIA as they have done it before.

posted on Aug, 21 2006 @ 01:37 AM
There are two members of congress who look exactly alike. I can't rememebr thier names. I remeber hearing about them on NPR last month.

Apparently these two lawmakers are so similar in appearance that you cannot notice the difference unless they are standing side by side. They are commonly mistaken for eachother by reporters. Even their wives can't tell the difference.

Wasn't there some research by the nazi's into cloning?

What a great way to seize control of a government, just make them all alike

[edit on 21-8-2006 by In nothing we trust]

new topics


log in