Israel lost war first time, page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 14-8-2006 @ 03:11 PM by ThePieMaN
Originally posted by pavil
Show me multiple instances of Israeli violation of Lebanese territory without some prior provocations by either Hezbollah or Palestinian elements. That Lebanon did not fill the vaccuum in Southern Lebanon is the main cause of the current crisis, which incidentally, was one of the the causes of the initial 1982 Israeli invasion. Having armed militas in your country, doing whatever they want is never a good idea, especially when those militias wage war against a neighboring country, who is the military power in the region.

The UN is not the "general world" for you I take it.



OK here is the the report from the General World for you. I didn't need this to know what I have heard through word of mouth to be true.
I was too lazy to look through all the reports but in a nutshell this is all of them that I got from a Blogsite and I will link the UNIFIL site as well

This guy sorted them all out.
nevadathunder.com...

Interim report of the secretary-general on the UN Interim Force in Lebanon, April 30, 2001:

“Since the resolution was adopted [i.e., since Israel’s withdrawal], the situation has remained essentially unchanged, although there were further developments in the dispute over Shab’a farms area. As before, there were frequent minor ground violations of the Blue Line. There were, in addition, almost daily violations of the line by Israeli aircraft which penetrated deeply into Lebanese airspace. I have been in touch with the parties concerned and other interested parties to urge respect for the Blue Line and to avert further escalation.”

Report of the secretary-general for the period from July 18, 2000, to Jan. 18, 2001:

“Israeli violations of Lebanese air space, which had resumed after Hizbollah’s attack on 7th October, continued on an almost daily basis.”



UNIFIL LEBANON Documents


Are you going to count Sheepherders as Hizbollah and fishermen as being an antagonistic force?

Mod Edit: Reduced Excessive External Quote.

[edit on 14/8/2006 by Mirthful Me]


reply posted on 14-8-2006 @ 04:10 PM by pavil
Originally posted by ThePieMaN
Are you going to count Sheepherders as Hizbollah and fishermen as being an antagonistic force?



No of course not but if you look at this, it's something different:
27 May 2006 - An IDF soldier was wounded when Katyushas were fired at an army base at Mt. Meron in the upper Galilee.



7 Oct 2000 - Kidnapping: Three IDF soldiers: Adi Avitan, Omer Soued and Binyamin Avraham were kidnapped by the Hizballah from the Mt. Dov sector
.
www.mfa.gov.il... F-4274-B80D-6BBD1803E8A7,frameless.htm?NRMODE=Published



There are 17 other incidents where either someone one killed or wounded by attacks from the Lebanese side of the border

And even in your sources you see things like:
“Israeli violations of Lebanese air space, which had resumed after Hizbollah’s attack on 7th October, continued on an almost daily basis.”

A cycle of disruptions and armed exchanges across the Blue Line commenced on 5 May.


Your sources seem to have left out this in an early 2003 UN report (probably an oversight on their part):

can't external source it due to PDF file:
Paraphrasing:
Jan 21 Hezbollah launches 56 mortar rounds.

Hezbollah increased the number or anti aircraft guns, one which was in close proximity to UNIFIL post 8-32 for several months.
daccessdds.un.org... ?OpenElement

Here's from Jan to July 2002

Again Paraphrasing due to PDF file: (and again, probably and oversight)
March 30 to April 13 2002,
UNIFIL records 152 anti tank missiles, 1,246 mortars, 28 Kasuskas, 11 surface to air missiles and hundreds of small arms rounds in the Sheba farms area.

daccessdds.un.org... ?OpenElement

Those UN reports are full of details, those were the only two I had time to look at and there was more in each of those reports even. There has been enough "antagonistic forces" around for Israel to take notice and action. Don't make it sound like Israel is attacking Shepards in response to rocket attacks.

It really comes down to Lebanon not taking control of their own land in the south of Lebanon. Let's hope this ceasefire allows them to do that finally.


reply posted on 14-8-2006 @ 08:11 PM by missed_gear
Originally posted by ThePieMaN
Thats why I left it there. I saw the Hizbollah attack,

Well…then of course you do realize there is more than one “attack” by Hezbollah listed throughout the years of reports you linked...in fact there are numerous Hezbollah attacks…and as documented the vast majority are instigated by Hezbollah…period.
Originally posted by ThePieMaN
They recorded about 10,000 incursions by Israel, and about 100 by Hizbollah. Flying at low altitude causing sonic booms is not an act of kindness

First off…Hezbollah is NOT the Lebanese military…Hezbollah’s acts are not those of Lebanon…or are they?

Mentioning UN interim field reports…not all Israeli air incursions involved “sonic booms”, get that strait……Furthermore, a “sonic boom” is a far more desirable option than dropping bombs and missiles…the point gets across…yes? It’s not hard to cognitively understand this is it?

Hezbollah has staged attacks, cross border raids, military campaigns, kidnappings (not just this year's), launched thousands of documented missiles and mortar rounds, exploded ‘road side bombs’…all prior to this buffer conflict…the UN reports acknowledge Israel as responding and NOT instigating through report after report, year after year…check your own UN source …oh yeah…the current ceasefire recognizes Hezbollah as the aggressor/instigator…correct?

Secondly…who exactly is “they” that have come-up with this 10:1 ratio?...a majority of the Israeli incursions involved reconnaissance, not martial action… and specifically reconnaissance of a group of self proclaimed militants…any nation that has the air resources and capability would do the same especially given the extesive martial works that were being implaced, year after year (or do you think the Lebanese government would gleefully provide pictures?) …the remainder of the incursions were in response to attacks into Israel or against the IDF…

Originally posted by ThePieMaN
I also put the link directly to the UNIFIL site so that anyone can check.


Use it.

mg


reply posted on 14-8-2006 @ 11:17 PM by infinite8
Originally posted by ThePieMaN
The UN asked that in the spirit of the cease fire that they stop now if possible. What does israel do? Get in a few shots by dropping bombs all along the Syrian-Lebanese border killing people for the last few days. Frikkin LOSERS killed a woman and her 3 children. Bombed a bridge killed civilians then came back and bombed the rescuers trying to help them. The word coward is even too good a word for these animals.


Are you really paying attention to whats going on ThePieMan? BOTH sides were fighting continuously until the cease fire. This includes Israel and this includes Hezbollah. I sense your bias, and its ok to choose a side, but just state the facts.

As far as Israel losing the war. I think thats a misjudgement. There is something a lot larger going on. A larger plan in place. I think Israel is doing exactly what they want. To tell you the truth, I do not believe that Hezbollah can honor the cease fire. Even if they do, it will be short lived. Irans decision comes in a little over a week. Hezbollahs largest missle threat and first responce to bombings of Irans nuclear sites has been weakened on the direct border of Israel and Lebanon. That is Israel most direct threat in response. Syria has not threatened to attack Israel is Iran is bombed. Israel was enabled politically for a short time to create a buffer for itself. It needs a temporary border while this Iran thing is figured out.

Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



On why America is in denial and Ron Paul will not be elected
  Posted 19 days ago with 21 member flags
Study says racists and conservatives are dumb
  Posted 8 days ago with 16 member flags
Is ‘anti-Canadianism’ the new ‘anti-Americanism?’
  Posted 18 days ago with 8 member flags
Clarification on the definition of "natural born citizen"
  Posted 16 days ago with 7 member flags