It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Where the safe places are!

page: 1

log in


posted on Aug, 12 2006 @ 11:59 AM
Just a thought:
Isn't it a good idea that movement of politicians or some authorities in the higher level need to be monitored and be followed by anybody wherever they go to be safe? I believe that some of them will be notified by any means to avoid any next possible attack.

I'd like to start this thread and see who will contribute for the whereabouts or mobility of people who think they know have that first hand information.

posted on Aug, 12 2006 @ 12:04 PM
Its not a reliable predictor of anything. After all important people are constantly on the move.

Whats worth watching is when a high number of important people suddenly start moving somewhere together, or a number of people start behaving very differently with no noticable reason.

posted on Aug, 19 2006 @ 01:34 PM
From this thread, aug 22 wierd stuff, the catholic celebrates August 22nd as the Queenship of Mary in their churches. They said prayers to the Queen of Peace to intercede is perhaps very appropriate at this time.

posted on Aug, 20 2006 @ 02:09 PM
Good example:

The most safe place for the US Prime Minister is the Air Force One. In flight.
This is a special place in case of any emergency.

posted on Aug, 20 2006 @ 04:48 PM

Originally posted by Thymus
Good example:

The most safe place for the US Prime Minister is the Air Force One.

I must have slept through my Civics class. Who is the Prime Minister of the U.S.?

The exact capacity is classified, of course, but it is widely reported Air Force One can remain aloft for up to 30 days with the water and food stores on board. Aerial refueling is often done, but getting some more MRE's on board while in flight is a bit tricky...

One claim I read many years ago was the safest place in the U.S. in case of nuclear war or mega disaster was the SW Oregon Coast. No climate extremes, far from population centers, no military or economic importance so it won't get any attention from potential adversaries, and general prevailing winds from the ocean keep the air clear from contaminants.

posted on Aug, 20 2006 @ 05:13 PM

i sure wouldn't gravitate towards either the boonies of W. Virginia or the
mountainious areas around Denver CO....where the visible government
has built underground fortresses, presumably for the 'continuity of Govt"

just like other dis-information, those 2 sites are placebos for the masses
& the GS rated employees in govt to feel secure about,

If you looking for a safe sanctuary, i'd try Cuba ->maybe even Brazil
whenever the Jihadists or the Enemy-de-Jour begins their seige upon Amerika.

because i have a feeling that the PTB (presently Bush, Cheney, Rice, the other 4-5 head neocons)
will launch on the Shuttle (or its replacement) into orbit for that critical 1st week.

All us peons will just have to be lucky or possess amazing insights to excape the chaos/anarchy/desperation/unrestrained savagery of world-wide collapse of law & order

posted on Aug, 25 2008 @ 11:49 PM
reply to post by Skadi_the_Evil_Elf

I read somewhere that the Bush family is buying lots of land in Peru!

top topics


log in