Originally posted by Britguy
The F-15's from Lakenheath can be seen at low level most days across the East of England. No location given for the sighting of these aircraft so
difficult to say whether it was just the normal day to day flying.
The F-15C's would be more likely to go up in any escort / CAP role rather than the F-15E's which are primarily mud thumpers.
Actually, the F-15E has a couple really big advantages:
1. It's Radar and Targeting Pod.
While the APG-63V(1) has most of the updates that the APG-70 came with, the latter can cue it's LANTIRN (or Sniper) pod to look for specific
signatures (absence of running lights, logos on the tail, number of engines in what configuration etc. etc.) from quite aways out.
2. It's got CFTs. While ordinarily this would hardly be a matter of celebration in the A2A role, the 48th FW are also just about the only users of
F100-PW-229 engines outside maybe Alaska. Which means that they have the gas to stay up for awhile (especially if they are also hauling 610s) and
they have the umph to kick it up a notch if things get serious. Ironic really since I remember a certain general demanding that they get those
"Bleepity Bleep Bleeping Engine Fire Waiting To Happen Bleepity Bleep Bleeps Off My Airplanes!" not too long ago.
Mind you, fully tanked up, the Flubber or even Fin is just as nice for ADIZ type work in terms of endurance and for USAFE assets to be commited to
ADGB taskings would /probably/ require more paperwork through NATO and CENTAF (or whoever runs our assets in the UK now) than it's worth.
About the only condition that would break this rule would be another 9/11 event in which case there may well be a 'nearest fighters available' type
modifier that passes tactical control directly to whatever ATC assets have block-airspace responsibility over that part of England.
Don't rule out the Eagle. It's old as the hills but in the F-15E it at least has the correct engine/sensor combination to be an -extremely- potent
ADI against 'casual' threats.
KPl.