I wanna play. My turn.
Dr. can I call you Dr. orr is it Mr. Leary?
If between the Comic relief, I have understood Marc correctly he has noted.
- Suggest that a Road was constructed
- Suggest the Specific use of TWIWDI (The Way I Would Do It)
- Suggest the Intestinal Level, may have been utilized
And the 6" steps. And more late. You'll love my "roller stay/pass by device" That's mine mine mine.
Three Suggestions of which two make more sense that current assumptions, and specifically in relation to the GREAT PYRAMID, apposed to the Copies that sit within the confines of the Giza Area. (which are poor copies at that)
That I'M not familiar with and want o see.
This is all, Marc is claiming.
Don't forget that I claimed to be smarter and a better bragger wiich is the focus of many and the chance you just gave me to repeat it while in compliance with my ules will not go over well at all.
And so much for well funded serious, scientific attempts to offer solutions. They fail, yet here is common sense, being applied, which you have no regard for. I guess you are a DR.
And many I've seen would have been greatly helped by ANY old safe mover. In fact they would demand to be in charge or leave because they couldn't watch.
Sorry to say, but you need to shake loose the clutter fogging your mind. Be open to Thoughts.
When I'm poven wrong or see something that betters my idea you will see it so. What am I not open to?
I agree that some of the smaller stones could have been moved in this manner, but surely there are some things we still don't understand about the manipulation of massively huge stones................. (Non intelligent ramblings deleted)
We need a wieght of small and little that is agreed on.
And I am sure, if you took the time to consider what is being discussed here, maybe we could understand about manipulation of Massively Huge Stones.
We are talking about sheep shagigng right?
I certainly am interested to find out, and from his "Practical Background" I would tend to say, this gives him more creditibly than your petty dismissal.
But this is not to say, Marc is Correct.
I'm going for "not wong".
This only notes, that along with the litany of Stupid Offerings by those who have all the answers, here is a few easy and possible methods that may have been utilized, just like the Theories you seem to embrace. MAY HAVE.
I intend to prove my way is faster, uses less energy, is safer, travels less distance, accounts for all know facts, and will allow me to brag.


