It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Saphronia
But, there is this lack of compassion in some of the comments that just aren't present when we are talking about the crimes against humanity done to the jews during the holocaust ...
Originally posted by Saphronia
Jsobecky,
What people of color find racist is all about perception. So, maybe your intent isn't to be racist, but it was racist to the person (Ceci) that read it. She reacted to it, but she also goes a long way to explain to you guys why it is racist. Maybe it would help matters if you actually took note of what she finds offensive in your comments.
Sometimes it is best to back up and take notice because she isn't the only black person that reacts badly to some of your positions. It isn't up to me or her for that matter to decide what you believe, but if I am offended and she is offended and HH is offended---maybe it is time for you to examine what causes the offense.
Maybe this won't help at all, but I felt the need to say something after reading what you decided to post to her. If these are the things you believe at least stand up and accept the reactions you are getting to them.
You can't tell me what is racist just like I can't tell you that you are a racist. I never would say that, but some of the things you have said in the past leaves a bitter thought in the back of my mind as well.
Originally posted by Saphronia
I'd feel really bad if you thought what I am seeking is guilt on the part of today's white man.
Originally quoted by Benevolent Heretic
Ceci, when people say something to you, many times, you take offense when it isn’t intended. And you have a habit of deciding what people mean, even if they didn’t say it. You add meaning and import to people’s words and then repeat them as if they actually said them. Many times this is the basis of your whole argument. Therefore, many times, your whole argument is based on something that never happened. That is the case here with both of these supposed “insults”. Hang on to them if you must, but just know that the meaning YOU gave to them is much more sinister than my intent.
Originally quoted by Saphronia
What people of color find racist is all about perception. So, maybe your intent isn't to be racist, but it was racist to the person (Ceci) that read it. She reacted to it, but she also goes a long way to explain to you guys why it is racist. Maybe it would help matters if you actually took note of what she finds offensive in your comments. Everyone is so intent on "defending themselves". Sheesh! Sometimes it is best to back up and take notice because she isn't the only black person that reacts badly to some of your positions. It isn't up to me or her for that matter to decide what you believe, but if I am offended and she is offended and HH is offended---maybe it is time for you to examine what causes the offense. The same goes for FF, in this case. Maybe this won't help at all, but I felt the need to say something after reading what you decided to post to her. If these are the things you believe at least stand up and accept the reactions you are getting to them. You can't tell me what is racist just like I can't tell you that you are a racist. I never would say that, but some of the things you have said in the past leaves a bitter thought in the back of my mind as well. Yeah, it is completely up to me how I react to it--but if you truly reject racism you should want to know why you are getting that reaction. Either way, you have my attention.
Originally posted by Open_Minded Skeptic
Personally, I am not convinced that clear and to-the-point discussions when offense is taken are off the point (they can easily become so).
Originally posted by Saphronia
"Oh, there go dem lazy black folk always looking for a hand out."
Originally posted by Rasobasi420
I just sit on my stoop drinkin' 40s with my crew, hustlin' and drug dealin' to get by. Then I take my drug money and buy gold chains and grillz so people know I'm a muthaufckin' P-I-M-P.
Originally posted by ceci2006
There is still a perception here that some of the white folk here can do no wrong, but the black folk always have something wrong with them.
That is why people remain fixated on the behaviorial issues. And that is why, I also added that when they happen, it often means two things:
1)Some white folks avoid the more troubling issues of race and do not want to confront them.
2)That they do not have anything meaningful to contribute and turn to other things to compensate, like focusing on what I said or did.
To me, that sounds like a real problem that I don't need to work out.
It is not up to you to tell me what I should take from your comments. If I found offense to them, I did. Just like you found offense with my words (Miss Scarlett, the Lyncher). But FYI: Usually I use allusions like that to get people to see the type of dynamics that are going on in a discussion. I'm sorry I had to say them, but it seems that sometimes no other way works.
And despite all that, you didn't even take note that I gave you my apology and asked for us to bury the hatchet. That tells me a lot there too.
But please pay attention to what Saph said (which I thank her highly for defending what I was trying to say) to jsobecky. I hope that might shed light on what we are trying to say:
And all I can say about jsobecky's comments, is that he has a long way to go about "getting it" than the rest of you. I pity him more than others.
Originally posted by Open_Minded Skeptic
It may be that some people are vehemently opposed to this idea because at their core they know how bad the whole slavery and subsequent eras were in the US. And they reject completely that they could ever have had anything to do with that. So strongly that it might almost approach denial that it happened (note: I am not saying people deny the slavery era happened). And official reparations would be an acknowledgement that it did happen.
I see a parallel between this and what I expect to see in a few years as a backlash to the current torture debate. I believe that in a while, people are going to wake up and realize what has happened. That some of them have actively endorsed torture. And I think they are going to be appalled, at themselves and at the US government. And I think talk of reparations will come up then, and be strongly opposed for much the same reason - people will reject to their cores that they ever had anything to do with it.
Regarding offense
One thing to keep in mind, I believe, is that the words themselves do not offend. If it were the words themselves, then everybody who read/heard them would be offended. But I'd be willing to bet that the same words could be said to two people and one would be offended and the other would not. Hence, it is the perception of the hearer that gives the words power. Not the words themselves.
Originally quoted by Benevolent Heretic
An insult hurled at one black person doesn't necessarily mean to insult them all. And if it does, well, there's no right or guarantee that people won't be offended in life. We all are.
Originally posted by Rasobasi420
There is plenty of good, realistic, non-MTV-BET music being put out by black artists, but you'll never see it on TV because it empowers the black community, and I don't think that would do well for corperate america.
Originally posted by Saphronia
But, I'm sorry, I don't hear anyone telling the Jews that collected their checks and apologies to "get over it" or "get a job".
Originally posted by Open_Minded Skeptic
Personally, I am not convinced that clear and to-the-point discussions when offense is taken are off the point (they can easily become so).
Originally quoted by jsobecky
I disagree. That perception may live in your mind, but there has been nothing said in this thread to support it.
It actually means a third thing. And attempting to place blame on whites for your inability to control your own temper is incongruous.
You're trying to shift the focus away from your problem onto whites. Not totally unlike the thinking that accompanies "She deserved to get raped" or "She deserved to get beaten by her husband".
Nobody is buying the "experiment" ruse, ceci.
But you won't accept her apology, will you?
And I am anxiously awaiting her response.
Your pity is about as worthless as your apologies.
And you're damn right - I don't get it. Because to you, "getting it" means agreeing with anything you say. And that will never happen.
Originally posted by The Black Widow
Sit everyone in a dark room... no light what so ever. And let them all talk.
Originally posted by ceci2006
No. I really believe that white folks need to work these issues out. Several white authors had said that their own race has a problem in facing the more disturbing aspects of race. Heck, you don't need to believe me. Believe them. They're talking about the white condition when dealing with racism.
Originally posted by riley
So you are using books written by white authors to prove your assertion that people with this "white condition" are inherently racist?
Originally quoted by OMS
It may be that some people are vehemently opposed to this idea because at their core they know how bad the whole slavery and subsequent eras were in the US. And they reject completely that they could ever have had anything to do with that. So strongly that it might almost approach denial that it happened (note: I am not saying people deny the slavery era happened). And official reparations would be an acknowledgement that it did happen.
I see a parallel between this and what I expect to see in a few years as a backlash to the current torture debate. I believe that in a while, people are going to wake up and realize what has happened. That some of them have actively endorsed torture. And I think they are going to be appalled, at themselves and at the US government. And I think talk of reparations will come up then, and be strongly opposed for much the same reason - people will reject to their cores that they ever had anything to do with it.
Personally, I am not convinced that clear and to-the-point discussions when offense is taken are off the point (they can easily become so). One idea behind this whole thread is for people of various races to learn about each other. People have different ways of saying things, and what is a completely not-intended-to-offend remark to someone may be a serious offense to someone else.
If this is discussed cleanly, then people might learn things. Not that the person saying the 'offending' remark is necessarily expected to immediately never use that term or phrase again. But people can learn about each other. If someone is offended at something fine. Check it out. Ask what the other person meant. Communicate.
Real, effective communication is sometimes difficult, especially in writing. But it can be done. It just takes some effort and commitment by the people involved.
One thing to keep in mind, I believe, is that the words themselves do not offend. If it were the words themselves, then everybody who read/heard them would be offended. But I'd be willing to bet that the same words could be said to two people and one would be offended and the other would not. Hence, it is the perception of the hearer that gives the words power. Not the words themselves.
dominant ideology Politics Marxist account of control through ideas.
In any society the dominant ideas are those of the dominant class. In capitalist societies, dominant ideology is thus a powerful means of maintaining the system.
[Nicholas Abercrombie, Shephen Hill and Bryan S. Turner. The Dominant Ideology Thesis (London, 1980).]
Bothamley, Jennifer., Ed. Dictionary of Theories. Detroit: Visible Ink, 2002: 157.
perception Psychology Not attributable to any one orginiator, this term refers to the way we see the world around us.
Psychologists are interested in understanding how organisms, especially humans, detect and interpret stimuli about the world. The two main theories on perception are the classical approach and that contained within Gestalt theory.
[P.J. Barber and D. Legge. Perception and Information (London, 1976)]
Bothamley, Jennifer., Ed. Dictionary of Theories. Detroit: Visible Ink, 2002: 404.
power Politics/Sociology Theory of individuals' and groups' abiity to achieve their ends.
In social relations, power is exercised by persons or institutions acting in such a way that their interests or wishes prevail over those of others. They are thus responsible for the consequences. There is dispute, however, over the extent to which they need to be aware of these consequences for it to be usefully said that power is being exercised.
[David Miller et al., eds. The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Political Thought Oxford, 1987)]
Bothamley, Jennifer., Ed. Dictionary of Theories. Detroit: Visible Ink, 2002: 425.
racial memory Psychology Proposed by the Swiss psychiatrist Carl Gustav Jung (1875-1961).
Most often associated with Jung's analytic psychology, racial memory consists of thoughts, feelings and inferences which are believed to be passed on from generation to generation and which influence the behavior of the individual. According to Jung racial memory is a part of the collective unconscious. Freud also believed in racial memory, but focused on a different aspect of it.
[C.G. Jung. Analytical Psychology: Its Theory and Practice (New York, 1968)]
Bothamley, Jennifer., Ed. Dictionary of Theories. Detroit: Visible Ink, 2002: 444.
racism Politics/Sociology Theory of the biologically determined basis of human social character. The term 'racism' is used critically of those emplyoing such theory, rather than as a term of self description.
Humans are divided into biologically distinct groups whose characteristics are passed on by inheritance. Differences in ability, taste, aptitude and culture are thus explained by race. The theory of race, which developed in the 19th century was widey discredited after its employment by the Nazi regime as justification for the mass murder of Jews, gypsies and others deemed inferior. It has been re-employed in the second half of the 20th century by some conservative and right wing thinkers.
[David Miller et al., eds. The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Political Thought Oxford, 1987)]
Bothamley, Jennifer., Ed. Dictionary of Theories. Detroit: Visible Ink, 2002: 444.