It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ceci2006
1)What can be used as "effective" communication in terms of understanding racial issues so that everything is clear (thanks to Blarney63 for bringing this up)?
racism
One entry found for racism.
Main Entry: rac·ism
Pronunciation: 'rA-"si-z&m also -"shi-
Function: noun
1 : a belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race
2 : racial prejudice or discrimination
Originally posted by ceci2006
2)What would make a difference in understanding the different sides of the race-relations debate? Since there is a clash of values, what can end it so that we can get to the middle ground?
bigot
One entry found for bigot.
Main Entry: big·ot
Pronunciation: 'bi-g&t
Function: noun
Etymology: French, hypocrite, bigot
: a person obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices; especially : one who regards or treats the members of a group (as a racial or ethnic group) with hatred and intolerance
Originally posted by HarlemHottie
One group thinks that racism is dead and that, by talking about it here, or anywhere, we're just stirring up old drama.
...
For the purposes of this thread, the first group should leave.
Another group thinks that racism still exists, but that its not as bad as it once was. According to this belief, people of color should be happy with the advancements made thus far, but shouldnt really push the issue. Little by little, they think, progress is being made.
The last group thinks that racism affects every facet of our lives and wonders where the other two groups have been for the last forty years. They cite academic papers, news reports, and other "proof." This group may also believe that there is a conspiracy to "keep blacks down."
Originally posted by ceci2006
1)To have guilt for something is to acknowledge wrongdoing.
...
No one, unless they have done an actual offense against another human being should have to say that they are guilty.
...
We've got to take terms like "White Guilt" and throw it out the window, imho. It is as bad as the N-word in my point of view.
Thread
Originally posted by ceci2006
Originally quoted by riley
Which words are they? Looking.. no. I haven't said anything biggoted. Looking again.. nope. Nice try.
Yes. I guess we all have a good hand at denial, don't we? Nice try in the effort of artful dodging. After all, we all can't have a clean slate, can we? This is an effort to be honest--instead of trying to play "root out the black racist".
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
This group, though, if they do exist in this thread, have every right to their opinion and have every right to express it. They should not just leave as you have suggested. This is not a classroom or a closed discussion.
But my point is - You, HH, have told me that many black people feel the same way that Ceci does. This is not hopeful for race relations. It puts fear and doubt into my mind. See, I thought we had come further than that. Now, knowing that many black people feel about white people the way Ceci does about me... That scares the crap out of me and does absolutely nothing for the advancement of race relations.
Originally posted by HarlemHottie
I've told you this before, and I'll say it again, you two have a personal thing going on.
And, I also haven't noticed any of the other black posters in this thread, so maybe they feel the same way I feel, but of course, I couldn't know for sure.
It's her style that you object to.
IMHO, Ceci is just extremely frustrated by some of the comments about race, especially blacks, made on the board. I know I am.
We also recognize that our failure to truly acknowledge these historical injustices has led many in the community from seeing themselves as fully Canadian.
Therefore, Mr. Speaker, on behalf of all Canadians and the Government of Canada, we offer a full apology to Chinese Canadians for the head tax and express our deepest sorrow for the subsequent exclusion of Chinese immigrants.
...
And while Canadian courts have ruled that the head tax, and immigration prohibition, were legally authorized, we fully accept the moral responsibility to acknowledge these shameful policies of our past.
....
And even though the head tax – a product of a profoundly different time -- lies far in our past, we feel compelled to right this historic wrong for the simple reason that it is the decent thing to do, a characteristic to be found at the core of the Canadian soul.
....
Our deep sorrow over the racist actions of our past will nourish our unwavering commitment to build a better future for all Canadians.
www.pm.gc.ca...
White guilt refers to feelings of guilt said to be experienced by some people of European descent when they consider present or past wrongs committed by their ancestors against natives of conquered and colonised lands. It is usually used with regard to White Americans and Black Americans
en.wikipedia.org...
Originally posted by jsobecky
“Leveling the playing field” is troublesome. Should we give blacks preferential treatment in educational and occupational opportunities? ...
Originally posted by jsobecky
Finally, do we have the duty, or the right, to change people’s minds? If my neighbor doesn’t care about racism, who am I to insist that he must?
Originally posted by Open_Minded Skeptic
Well said.
However, giving blacks (or any color) preferential treatment is not "leveling the playing field". Preferential treatment is preferential treatment. I'm thinking that a true leveling of the 'playing field' might not be a bad thing.
Originally posted by jsobecky
Finally, do we have the duty, or the right, to change people’s minds? If my neighbor doesn’t care about racism, who am I to insist that he must?
I guess my answer to this depends on what is meant by "change people's minds". We still so far in this country have the right to discuss matters with people... even people with whom we disagree. And we have the right to present viewpoints and arguments that may in fact change someone else's mind. I have experienced that from both sides, as I am sure most have.
But to insist that someone change their mind, no. To use force or coercion of any kind to affect a change of mind, no.
And do we have the 'duty' to attempt to change someone's mind? I'd say No, we do not have that duty.
Do I feel badly for First Nations people and the struggles they have to go through and feel that the government owes them some sort of assistance? I think so. But for me, it's not about white guilt, it's about wanting a healthy society and bringing things to that 'level playing field'.
Thank you for such thought-provoking posts about the concept of white guilt. I was wondering if perhaps I suffered from it or not and if it was good or bad if I was/wasn't suffering from it. I'm not from the US, and I usually make a habit of avoiding the topic of racism on ATS and Slugfest. I don't usually do well here. I always want everyone to get along even if they don't agree.
:
Thank you for not killing me so far.
Originally posted by Open_Minded Skeptic
There was, I believe, an official government apology to the Japanese imprisoned in the US during WWII. I don't know if there was money involved.
There is a special factor related to racism against black people in the US, as opposed to all the other kinds of racism here. That is the fact that at one time in the US, black people were property. They were not considered human...
Now on the the guilt factor. The actions of the Canadian gov't you describe are what might be termed 'institutional' guilt. And the US gov't has that in spades regarding the slavery era... Then there is the matter of the general, personal guilt termed White Guilt. Guilt that is supposed to be felt by all white people now, for what some white people, and government, did then. That is what I have nothing to do with.
I am not aware of any apology to black people for that era, and the horror of what the slave holders did may be why. I believe the government should own up to what happened, and an apology would not, I think, be unreasonable.
I think it is not unreasonable to believe that the complete lack of decency demonstrated then was so extreme that people - as in government people - have trouble accepting it.
Originally posted by ceci2006
So, the question should truly be asked in terms of such experiments and the ranking of "those who suffered", is whether people truly care about Blacks enough to acknowledge their suffering in comparison to other groups of people who have endured genocide and enslavement?
Or, better yet, it would be helpful to just rank the sufferers in the world in terms of who most deserves our sympathy and time. That would be an eye-opening survey to say the least.