It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by donwhite
So What Have I Learned?
Free to retire at the end of each workday into a gated community. ... Ahh, it’s nice to get home to a plasma tv and a quiet, ac house. Maybe take a dip in the pool, or to relax, just sit in the hot tub. Maybe put on a John Denver cd.
These upscale whites have their world.
Originally posted by donwhite
That blacks face a tiring and demanding world. Rents higher than the neighborhood merits. Landlords who appear only on rent day. Junk littered about. Cars that have not moved for months. Now home to a nest of rats. Men who have not worked for so many years they forgot when it was. Men who dropped out of high school to take a penny-ante job. Then as they got older, unable to get a job at Delco-Remy. You must have a high school diploma, they said.
By now a father of a child, but not yet married. Then the man began to harass him to support the child. He wanted to, but he hardly made enough to carry his weight at his own parent’s home. Last hired, first fired, was real life for him. Then he forgot to go to court, and they put him in jail for a month. Or two. But he still had no job, but they said if he didn’t get one, he’;d go back to jail.
The man is strange. The man pays more to keep me in jail than I am supposed to pay in child support. When he asks for a job, the white boss asks if he has a record. If he says yes, then its no job. If he says no, then a records check will get him fired before his first pay check comes. How do white people know so much about me but can’t see I have no money to pay child support?
Originally quoted by nextguyinline
Have you experienced any situations where your black friends or community members have spoken to this effect to other black folk?
It's not just being in the room, it's trying to communicate. I'll explain my experience yesterday. I was in a photographers studio picking up some photos for the magazine. There was approximately 3 or 4 whites at the counter and/or sitting. There was approximately 6 blacks sitting. I asked the first white girl next to me who was sitting if they were waiting to be helped. I then asked the black girl sitting next to her. Now before I asked, all 6 or so the black folk, who may have been friends, were having a pretty good time, talking, laughing and what have you. As soon as I addressed the girl, everyone's attitude changed to what I interepted as 'whitey, what are you doing talking to me?' ALL of them. No smiles, just pursed lips, raised eyebrows and glances at each other. I don't know, take it as it is.
Sometimes. But only when the black folk walking are homeless or quite obviously ghetto. I've witnessed black folk do the same thing. I've witnessed white folk do it when other white folk walk by who quite obviously are homeless or look ghetto.
No, it's simple. More whites can afford the homes in those gated communities. Believe me, the people in those homes live behind their gates not to protect them from the big bad black people. It's the big bad teen and pre-teens who are out experiencing the world without much understanding of respect. Have you ever met a family from one of those homes. They are all registered here on ATS. Most are just unreasonably paranoid.
Originally quoted by donwhite
The blacks I interviewed never evaluated a person by their physical appearance, what he or she wore, where he or she lived, or by how much money he or she had. Whites, OTOH, seemed to have no other standards to measure a person’s worth. The first words, "he/she is good looking!" And it got worse from there. Never did I hear, “trustworthy,” or “reliable” or “generous.” I find that both curious and revealing.
Originally quoted by Benevolent Heretic
You can discuss it all you want, but I am not going to feel guilty because I haven't done anything. I treat black people (and people of all races) with respect. I treat them no differently than I treat white people. I'm sorry if that's not good enough for you. You have not convinced me that I am guilty, nor have you convinced me that I should feel guilty for something I have not done.
I don't have any interest in proving these to you or telling you the story. I don't care if you believe me. I don't lie.
I'm 48 years old. I have lived on the streets, I have been raped, I have stood by my mother as she died, I have lost a baby, I have been beaten. I have experienced things I hope you will never know about or experience yourself and I don't need your belief or validation about my experiences.
I have NOT ONCE doubted your experiences or indicated in any way that I thought you were lying.
This just shows how your mind works. You think all white people are treated a certain way and I've been trying to tell you for 13 pages that you're mistaken and you refuse to believe me. My 'whiteness' does not guarantee respect.
Exactly. It's a fact of life, not race. That was my point.
I'm sorry. My very best girlfriend of 25 years died last year because of improper and unattentive treatment. My young niece died 2 years ago, 4 days after giving birth to her baby because she got a staph infection in the hospital. They were both white.
If you don't want people to talk back, maybe you should write a book instead of enter into a discussion where there may be interaction, response and feedback, especially if you don't want an argument or dissent.
I'm not trying to disprove or deny your experience, I'm just saying that many times (not always) it's not a uniquely black experience. I'm trying to prove that these things happen more widely and not just for reasons of race. And I'm trying to say that racism happens. Classism happens. It's a part of life. You can get hung up on it and be a victim of it (as can I) or you can move through it.
I didn't say your parents were evil or anything. I just know that I picked up racism from my parents and I remember the moment I realized that they were wrong about black people. I assumed that you picked up at least part of how you feel about white people from your parents. I apologize if this assumption is incorrect.
My mother was a very generous and loving person also, she was just ignorant about race and therefore held some beliefs and attitudes that I disagree with. Just because a person is racist doesn't mean they're evil. They're usually just ignorant or afraid.
Originally by Benevolent Heretic
I'm not denying the experiences! I know they happen. I've seen them happen. I have experienced some of the very things you listed, not because of who I was but because I was with a black person. (I didn't list those as my personal experiences). I'm trying to put things in perspective. That doesn't mean I'm denying your experiences.
Just because I don't fall down in guilt doesn't mean I don't believe you. I do. I have eyes. I'm a sensitive, loving, caring person. Why would I have been fighting racism for 30 years if I didn't believe and SEE these things happen???
I'm not responding the way you would like. I'm not taking on responsibility for your experience. I'm not guilty for how you are treated in your life. But that doesn't mean I think you're lying!
I am responsible for how I treat people and that's it! And I treat people equally, without regard to race, class, gender or sexual orientation.
I'm not responsible for how all white people act any more than I am responsible for how all brown-eyed people act, any more than you are responsible for how all black people act. You want me to take on guilt for 'whitey' and I refuse.
Institutional Racism
Institutional racism (or structural racism or systemic racism) is a form of racism that occurs in institutions such as public bodies and corporations, including universities. The term was coined by black nationalist, pan-Africanist and honorary prime minister of the Black Panther Party Stokely Carmichael. In the late 1960s, he defined the term as "the collective failure of an organisation to provide an appropriate and professional service to people because of their colour, culture or ethnic origin".
In the UK, the inquiry following the murder of Stephen Lawrence accused the police force of being institutionally racist, an accusation that has subsequently been levelled at the media by Sir Ian Blair.
Institutional racism is distinguished from the bigotry or racial bias of individuals by the existence of systematic yet covert policies and practices that have the effect of disadvantaging certain racial or ethnic groups. Race-based discrimination in housing (see restrictive covenants) and bank lending (see redlining), for example, are forms of institutional racism.
Race, Racism and the Law
"Racist" and "racism" are provocative words in American society. To some, these words have reached the level of curse words in their offensiveness. Yet, "racist" and "racism" are descriptive words of a reality that cannot be denied. African Americans, Hispanic Americans, Native Americans and Asian Americans (people-of-color) live daily with the effects of both institutional and individual racism.
Race issues are so fundamental in American society that they seem almost an integral component. Some Americans believe that race is the primary determinant of human abilities and capacities. Some Americans behave as if racial differences produce inherent superiority in European Americans (whites). In fact, such individuals respond to people-of-color and whites differently merely because of race (or ethnicity). As a consequence, people of color are injured by judgments or actions that are directly or indirectly racist.
Much of the attention of the last 20 years has focused on individual racist behavior. However, just as individuals can act in racist ways, so can institutions. Institutions can behave in ways that are overtly racist (i.e., specifically excluding people-of-color from services) or inherently racist (i.e., adopting policies that while not specifically directed at excluding people-of-color, nevertheless result in their exclusion).
What is Institutional Racism?
"The collective failure of an organisation to provide an appropriate and professional service to people because of their colour, culture or ethnic origin which can be seen or detected in processes; attitudes and behaviour which amount to discrimination through unwitting prejudice, ignorance, thoughtlessness and racist stereotyping which disadvantages minority ethnic people."
Institutional Racism
Institutional discrimination is that discrimination that occurs simply because the rules and expectations were set when some privileged group was in control. Those not belonging to the privileged group find that they are harmed by the rules and expectations, but that it is "not personal," in the sense that no person is discriminating against them as individuals. The discrimination of the past simply led to rules that now do the same discriminating, but without a perpetrator. (Institutional racism is institutional discrimination based on race.)
[...]
Institutional discrimination is far more complex and more difficult to combat than overt discrimination where there is a perpetrator. In law, we used to refer to "de facto" discrimination, as opposed to "de jure" discrimination. Covaleskie discusses power as consisting of two major types: sovereign and disciplinary. Sovereign power goes with titles and overt authority to dictate rules and regulations. Disciplinary power resides in the rules, norms, and expectations for traditional performance. Institutional discrimination relies on disciplinary power. Since disciplinary power seems to apply the same rules to everyone, there seems to be little discrimination. But when the rules grew from contexts in which there was discrimination, the unstated assumptions carry those discriminatory contexts right along with the rules in present contexts.
posted by Blarney63
Racism - whew - what a weighty problem. Some would say I was a racist in my previous hiring practices - my natural response to that charge would have been to take offense because I had no malice nor ill will in my previous hiring practices. [Edited by Don W]
Obviously the solution to the problem is complex.
A good start would be, I believe, for minorities to try and refrain from the urge of claiming racism. Simultaneously, Caucasians could try and not summarily dismiss claims of racism as being a ploy to get some type of advantage. Perhaps, then, a helpful dialogue can ensue leading to real solutions.
Originally posted by donwhite
We are talking about undoing the disadvantages heaped upon a race of people over time - since 1619 - and that is not done easily or quickly.
One Q. Why do minorities have to “refrain” from claiming racism? Dialogue is fine, but we’ve been ‘dialoguing’ since 1954. Isn’t it time we took affirmative action to right the wrongs of the past? Just a little bit?
posted by Blarney63
I do not believe, respectfully, that affirmative action should be used to right the wrongs of the past. I believe it would breed resentment, especially in younger Caucasian generations, who would inevitably claim reverse "racism" . . I also believe the notion [AA] is patently unfair and cannot be used to correct unfairness. The answer will be less than optimum but will necessarily entail a solution that is most fair for all.
[Edited by Don W]
I believe boycotting businesses engaged in discriminatory hiring practices (whether intentional or subconsciously) can be effective . . “
“ , . vigorous enforcement of anti discrimination statutes through criminal and civil actions can go far. Perhaps businesses found guilty of discrimination in criminal and civil actions could be subject to affirmative action? Its more than we've got now.
Originally posted by Blarney63
I believe boycotting businesses engaged in disriminatory hiring practices (whether intentional or subconsciously) can be effective, and vigorous enforcement of antidiscrimination statutes through criminal and civil actions can go far. Maybe this is where your "little bit" question can be answered. Perhaps businesses found guilty of discrimination in criminal and civil actions could be subject to affirmative action? Its more than we've got now.
Originally posted by donwhite
That’s where I disagree. Anyone smart enough to send a man to the moon and back can fix this problem - legally - in one afternoon if he or she has serious intent. “Liking me” will come later, say blacks, “but I’ve got to get there first!” We’re not talking about “liking” each other. I’m a Waylon Jennings fan, do you think I’d ever enjoy rap? No way. We are talking about undoing the disadvantages heaped upon a race of people over time - since 1619 - and that is not done easily or quickly.
Originally quoted by Blarney63
I think it would help if the different races communicated more and used the same definitions when doing so. What I mean by this is that different races often perceive the same event differently due to having different life experiences or, perhaps, perceive events the same but describe them differently.
Upon further questioning, I discovered that many (not all) African Americans were referring to the history of the area - that racism caused people in the area to start out unfairly in an impoverished state that was extremely difficult to escape and that a straight line of causation can be traced back from the present day to days of old. In other words, but for slavery and centuries of racism, an entire group of people were stuck, financially poor, in the area where Katrina hit as opposed to a naturally racially diverse population being afflicted. I'm not sure if I'm getting my point across.
The concept is hard for Caucasians to get their hands around, I think, and impossible to grasp if there is not more effective communication. When many Caucasians summarily and honestly dismiss claims of racism due to not fully understanding what is being claimed, many people of color see just more racism in the response.
Another positive thing to do would be for those in hiring positions to hire the best qualified for jobs. We are in a unique position in American history. African Americans, and other minorities, are getting to a point where they have access to education and have so much to offer (I am not implying that racism has been eliminated).
Some would say I was a racist in my previous hiring practices - my natural response to that charge would have been to take offense because I had no malice nor ill will in my previous hiring practices.
The problem is complex because undoing the disadvantages heaped upon a race of people over so much time cannot be done easily or quickly.
Obviously the solution to the problem is complex. A good start would be, I believe, for minorities to try and refrain from the urge of claiming racism.
Simultaneously, Caucasians could try and not summarily dismiss claims of racism as being a ploy to get some type of advantage. Perhaps, then, a helpful dialogue can ensue leading to real solutions.
I do not believe, respectfully, that affirmative action should be used to right the wrongs of the past. I believe it would breed resentment, especially in younger caucasian generations, who would inevitably claim reverse "racism" despite there being no ill nor malice. I also believe the notion is patently unfair and cannot be used to correct unfairness.
Originally posted by ceci2006
I'm sorry you ignored it. I guess there has to be a new type of language to communicate the issues of race. Will Esperanto do?
Some people cannot comprehend that these things happen because they have never experienced such slights against their person and character in their entire life.
Originally posted by jsobecky
Originally posted by Blarney63
I believe boycotting businesses engaged in disriminatory hiring practices (whether intentional or subconsciously) can be effective, and vigorous enforcement of antidiscrimination statutes through criminal and civil actions can go far. Maybe this is where your "little bit" question can be answered. Perhaps businesses found guilty of discrimination in criminal and civil actions could be subject to affirmative action? Its more than we've got now.
I have to disagree here, Blarney63. Look at your own case - was it necessary to boycott your restaurant before you decided to change things?
Boycotts are unnecessary in larger corps.; minorities are protected by EEOC laws. So the effect is to target the small mom and pop businesses.
I personally don't believe that it is anybody's business to tell me who I must hire in my small business. Not unless they are willing to pick up the tab for the wages and benefits that I must pay to their choices.