Taking the Mask Off of Christianity, page 4
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6    7  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 2 times


reply posted on 21-8-2006 @ 09:55 PM by Stormrider
Originally posted by Osbert
Originally posted by cavscout
What I always find amazing about these types of conversations is the pride of those preaching the atheist faith. Enlightenment and righteousness, to whatever extent they can be achieved by man on Earth, must always have the prerequisite of humbleness followed by love followed by faith. Humbleness, love and faith are among the highest of the noble traits and are the only paths to the small level of righteousness that man can achieve on Earth. The quest for knowledge has its roots in pride, for the quest for knowledge assumes that man has the capacity for knowledge of the creator.

Who among us has true knowledge? Not one.

Should an infant take council with other infants as to the affairs of adults?

Who among us has the mind to rival the Lord? Who can out think the Alpha and Omega? The wisest of mankind understands only that he can understand nothing. How prideful are you all to think that you can understand anything!

What is your mission, Morning Star? What enlightenment can you have? To what do you attribute your knowledge? Aren’t you a created being? Aren’t you a man like me, or are you more, or are you less?



If you want to witness real pride go to the Vatican in Rome and spend a few minutes observing the Cardinals..


You're evading Cavscout's question, Osbert; What do you bring to the table in the way of enlightenment and why should your opinion or views have any more weight than anyone elses? Where do you get the cheek to tear down another person's faith, without offering anything tangible in return? Do you have anything spiritually edifying to offer us, or are you just bashing what you can't or won't accept?

I would really like to know. This question is not at all rhetorical; I'll accept responses from anyone who can give me one valid reason to think that what you don't believe is better than what I choose to believe? Any takers?


reply posted on 22-8-2006 @ 01:38 AM by Ersatz
Originally posted by Seraphim_Serpente
First off, Lucifer & Satan are not the same being at all. Secondly, Jesus Christ is certainly not connected to Satan at all - stating that Christ is like the Bright Morning Star is just that - a comparison.

There are about a Million Threads about the difference between Lucifer & Satan here on ATS (or you could just Google it) - I suggest that you educate yourself before you embarrass yourself again in your next post!


Satan in Christianity:
In the Bible the one named Devil and Satan is shown to be an angel who rebelled against God - the one who spoke through the serpent and seduced Eve into disobeying God's command. He is also identified therein as the accuser of Job, the tempter of the Gospels, and the dragon in the Book of Revelation. Before his betrayal it is widly believed that he was the highest of all angels and the" b]brightest in the sky", his divintity is considered a reason why he would not bow to God as all other angels did, but sought to rule heaven himself. He is called "the ruler of the demons" (Matt. 12:24); "the ruler of the world" and even "the god of this world." (2Cor. 4:4) The Bible book of Revelation describes how Satan is cast out of Heaven, down to the earth, having "great anger" and waging war with those "who have the work of bearing witness to Jesus" until he is destroyed forever in the "lake of fire." (Rev. 12:7-17; 20:10)

Satan is also commonly known as the Devil, the "Prince of Darkness," Beelzebub, Belial, Lucifer, and Mephistopheles.

Having quoted all that from Wiki, I do admit that there are many other interpretations depending wether it is Talmud or Islam etc..


reply posted on 22-8-2006 @ 07:30 AM by Ersatz
Originally posted by Stormrider
Originally posted by Ersatz
Not really a question of better or worse but personal opinion, mine is this:

DIVINE INSANITY

God killed himself on the cross to save his own creation from his own
wrath!


You call it insanity but I call it Love. To get even a small hold on this truth you first have to understand or at least accept the idea of the Trinity as a given. God is one God but three essances: God, The Father, God, The Son and God, The Holy Spirit.
Now this is the Love that God has for us, that though we are sinners and have seperated ourselves from Him, through our sin, God sent His Son (Jesus) to be born of a virgin(in other words, sinless since Christ was not born of man but of God), die a sinners/criminals death(and thereby pay the sin debt of death for all mankind) and then, rise from the dead, thereby, conquering death once and for all.
Then, The Holy Spirit convicts us of our need for a Savior and intercedes for us when we pray for forgiveness and confirms that forgiveness, afterward.

It's a mystery and a wonder and passing strange, for sure; but that is the gospel, in a nutshell. So, yes to those who haven't experienced it, it surely must seem like insanity but actually it's God's love and to believe that is what it means to be a Christian.



Galileo Galilei once defended himself with the following statement: "I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed us with sense, reason and intellect has intended us to forego their use."



reply posted on 23-8-2006 @ 11:23 AM by roger_pearse
There seem to be a number of factual errors in this thread which it benefits no-one to allow to circulate further. I respond to this as just one of those saying more or less the same, and I'm sure written all in good faith.

Originally posted by DenyAllKnowledge
I was under the impression that the cult of Mithras, which was popular within the Roman army, was one of the biggest influences on early Christianity. Mainly due to the fact that Emperor Constantine needed the support of the army when he decided to make Christianity the official state religion.

There are other links with Mithradites, he was born on the 25th of December, baptism (although Christians use water instead of blood!) and Sunday as a holy day. On 6 January following his birth, the infant Mithras was visited by Magi. Unusual coincidences eh?


The coincidences are so 'unusual' that they should make us suspicious. In fact

1. There is nothing in ancient literature that specifies any specific 'birthday' of Mithras.

2. There is no evidence of Mithras-worship involving baptisms (itself a pretty general analogy, based on the idea of a ritual bath -- do we presume every cult all around the world having such a thing is derived from Mithras?) which predates Christianity.

3. I do not find any ancient literary mention of the celebration of Sunday by followers of Mithras, although, as a sun-cult, it is possible that they did in some (not now recorded) manner.

4. There is no record of any 'visit of the Magi' to Mithras in ancient literature.

5. Constantine did not make Christianity the state religion. There is no text that mentions Mithras and Constantine at the same time, never mind states a connection.

I'm sorry to sound like a wet blanket. I got tired of these rumours -- which don't actually tell you anything about Mithras, notice -- some time ago, and looked up all the ancient mentions of Mithras. Here they are:

www.tertullian.org...

I hope that helps.

All the best,

Roger Pearse
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6    7  >>    ^^TOP^^



Why are these 10 figures just like Jesus Christ??
  Posted 7 days ago with 14 member flags
I am an imposter in Church
  Posted 6 days ago with 11 member flags
What Kind of Christianity Is This?
  Posted 18 days ago with 7 member flags
The Great Flood Was Caused By A Comet?
  Posted 13 days ago with 7 member flags
Advert claiming cure through prayer is banned
  Posted 7 days ago with 7 member flags
The real Jewish people. Torah Jews Against ZIONISM
  Posted 15 days ago with 6 member flags
The World Is in Desperate Need of Heretics!
  Posted 12 days ago with 6 member flags