This topic is in the Fragile Earth discussion forum.  (rss)


yucca mtn- ur thoughts on why?




Topic started on 7-8-2006 @ 08:11 AM by verbal kint


isn't it odd that the u.s. g decided to build it's primary nuclear waste dump site within 100 miles of las vegs? granted this also places it next to the nuclear test site/area 51. but are there other reasons?
Qstn: if san andreas fault finally gave, what is likely hood there would be some measureable amount of leakage of radioactive material into the mountains surrounding yucca?



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 7-8-2006 @ 09:42 PM by DontTreadOnMe


I'm not entirely sure where this thread belongs.
It sounds though that this is an environmental issue.
Maybe fragile earth is a better placce for this.

Do you have any links or sources to back up your post??



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 7-8-2006 @ 11:27 PM by dave_54


Since the San Andreas fault is several hundred miles from Yucca Mtn, NV, I would say very little chance of a major San Andreas rupture affecting the nuclear repository.

Yucca was chosen not because it was the safest geological or environmental location, it was chosen because it was the safest political location.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 



























ATS Server: www2.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.002 seconds
Page processed in 0.052 seconds
6 total database queries (1)









The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.





thread
Forums Directory