AboveTopSecret.com Video and Media Portal.Books, posters, and more.T-shirts, mouse pads, cups, and bags.Member podcasts.Conspiracy theory wiki.Alternative news headlinesBelowTopSecret.com - off topic and general chit chat.AboveTopSecret.com - conspiracy theories and


 

 

This topic is in the 9/11 Conspiracies discussion forum.  (rss)


**POLICY STATEMENT FOR THE 9/11 FORUM: ALL MEMBERS PLEASE READ**


<<  1    2  >>



reply posted on 18-6-2007 @ 06:02 PM by Djarums


Originally posted by alienamngus
So now you conspire to silence those who would exercise their freedom of speech? How are any of you different from the tyrants you criticize? This is just more of the typical drivel I have come to expect from this lame forum. Well I for one have had enough. You morons can take me off your list and play your little conspiracy games amongst yourselves. I will confine myself to discussion with those who have at least attained intellectual puberty and who don't emasculate themselves on the altar of tolerance.


Oh yes... nothing like searching for a one year old thread posted to politely ask people to stop calling each other names and using that as a springboard for your pathetic ranting.

Go away. The policy here is whatever your opinion may be, either voice it in a civilized fashion or don't participate. You have a problem with this because you seemingly can't participate without resorting to insults as seen in your somewhat amusing rant above.

It's a shame you haven't yet learned to respect others. Must've missed that lesson.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 8-8-2007 @ 12:16 AM by JonasSmith


read and duely noted, i cant believe how some people would set out to put a bad name to such a gd site



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 8-8-2007 @ 12:35 AM by parry noid


I would like to thank the Mods for taking the time to keep the peace as best they can, I have my own opinion about 9/11 and I'm sure most of you share the same opinion as me.

However to uses words of negativity in order to push your views onto others is just creating complete hypocrisies.

That is why the official story is there, and is constantly being pushed onto us. We have to take our own views and share them amongst ourselves until we reach a common agreement.

Only then can we attempt to enlighten the unknowing, only then can we attempt to challenge what we have been told. Only then will the we have the plausibility to be accepted by the general public in an attempt to seek the truth.

So until then, we must passively search for this common truth, and attempt to gather as much info and proof on our hypothesis into a theory, in order to change history and create our own place in this world.

Once again thanks to the Mods for their hard work and determination!



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 1-8-2009 @ 10:12 PM by the bringer of light


i hope this works but the thoughts behind the ignorance will still be there and they shouldn't



   copyright & usage 
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.


reply posted on 13-8-2009 @ 03:15 PM by herbii


Thank you! I applaud this new policy towards labeling 'conspiracy theorists' as nutjobs and the likes.. In my opinion, this type of rhetoric comes from the media as the media seems to dictate, well, actually create public opinion... it was the media who made a big deal about labeling 9/11 conspiracy theorists nutjobs, crazy ppl and lack no evidence.. but this is quite the contrary.. and in lieu of these outcries from the general media, it spilled over to all forms of speech..
Now, the internet has a become a major force in speech and public sentiment.. look at this "healthcare" bill and the bashing of Obama from the many BLOGS overstating their opinions of him.. this then almost becomes Fact. Obama has only been in office a few months and yet ppl are saying his Presidency is a fraud, a sham, a lie and a dictator.. Funny enuff b/c the left said this about Bush when he was President..
It just seems to be unfair on both sides of the political spectrum.. both sides of all stories need to be heard, even if an argument that presents itself is factual such as 2+2=4.. well, maybe someone has evidence it really equals 5 !! LOL.
I know thats a bit extreme, but so are these comments, so are these labels... I use Obama and the healthcare bill as an example b/c no one else is doing anything.. i think we can all agree something needs to be done and done now! I don't even agree with this Universal Healthcare Plan but its a step in the right direction.. Yet we have these "Obstructionists" on both sides who get in the way with trying to resolve something important to all of us for their own gains. Another example is Global Warming - i actually belive in global warming, b/c well, it can't hurt to change our ways to stop using fossil fuels.. this will have a trickle down effect and help all areas of our environment b/c once we go green for use of energies.. then, maybe we'll start paying attention to our oceans being raped of all its bounty of fish... Or, how Dairy Farms across the Northeast are having this effect on the Chesappeake Bay b/c of all the run off from Fertilizers and Manure has created dead zones covering over 40% of the bay...
some possible sources...
(www.cacaponinstitute.org...)
and
www.chesapeakebay.net...

So what I am getting to is those who believe "Global Warming" is a conspiracy should actually be heard.. they should be heard b/c this will help the overall outcome of our future.. to come to a mutual understanding and agreement, which will not only be a healthy debate, but may in fact help create new technologies that will benefit us all...



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 26-8-2009 @ 08:18 PM by flying high


Originally posted by ThichHeaded
I agree with this, I have been looking at the 9/11 area alot and have noticed a few members being rude and what not, which makes me basically not want to post anything.

Good call on this one guys.


it is very upsetting that some members can contribute in a way that makes other members feel like they them self cannot contribute dont let them baffle you with long un meaningful words they use them for that reason only and prob dnt no what half of them mean there selfs. x



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 25-10-2009 @ 12:38 PM by Nutter


Originally posted by wecomeinpeace
It has come to the attention of ATS admin and staff that the quality of discussion in the 9/11 forum has been steadily declining over the last few months, and that this has been in no small part due to the derailing of discussion by some members implying or directly stating that those who disagree with their point of view are stupid, "conspiracy nut jobs", or "government agents".


Am I to take it that this policy only applies to the conspiracy crowd? Because in my short time here, I have noticed that the CTers get the warns while posters like jthomas and thedman continually get away with calling posters "truthers" or "conspiracy kooks". Just wondering if I belong to a biased site?



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 25-10-2009 @ 12:44 PM by PeterGriffin


I agree, I think the criticism or at least harsh comments should be lessened, but NOT removed...and the author of the post shouldnt get points deducted if the opinion seems a bit over the top (from experience :lol On the other hand...foul language yeah warrants that..but I guess that's just my opinion...SOME "opinions" ARE off the wall and I think "calling that out" isn't a crazy bad thing...

One thing though..There are an awful lot of MODS commenting on this thread...and this policy...isn't it also policy NOT to have a heading in all CAPS??? Just saying :



   copyright & usage 


<<  1    2  >>

















































ATS Server: www2.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.002 seconds
Page processed in 0.067 seconds
6 total database queries (1)









The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.