It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by gfad
I think your idea is reasonably probable, except I think it will be less erliant on undercover personnel.
I do have some questions:
- Have your laser powered egines even been tested/prototyped/proven?
- Arent there easier ways to heat the air in the tube?
- Why do the UAVs have nodes for light to enter and exit?
Originally posted by THE_DARK_KNIGHT
1. Yes ill pull up a link from howstuff works or something. science.howstuffworks.com...
Originally posted by THE_DARK_KNIGHT
2. Yes, but with my way there is an unlimited amount of fule in a sence.
Originally posted by THE_DARK_KNIGHT
3. Point defence and shooting the beam at friendly crafts to keep them aloft.
Originally posted by gfad
The link details laser propulsion but in a completely different form to what you described.
Thats not true ... you still need energy to create the Laser beam and to get that energy you need fuel.
Originally posted by gfad
Princess??
Its not that I’m saying the propulsion won’t work, but apparently it hasn’t been tested in any form. Can you really base your vision of the future on an unproven technology that you have just come up with?
You have voted THE_DARK_KNIGHT for the Way Above Top Secret award.
Originally posted by chinawhite
THE_DARK_KNIGHT your getting a WAB for effort
You have voted THE_DARK_KNIGHT for the Way Above Top Secret award.
Originally posted by ShatteredSkies
It's a nice drawing, but I don't think you understand exactly what the Light Propulsion systems will be used for. They are an unproven technology too, so far, from what I understand, it's just a theory and it MIGHT work.
Where are all the ground troops?
And I saw your bit about nuclear power... How are you going to fit a nuclear power plant, and it's fuel into a UAV? And you said nothing about UCAVs, and UAVs have no battle ability. You might want to fix that little error.
and a spotter to fully combat an enemy, the Air Force is only one part of a war, there are many things in a theatre of combat that need to come together precisely in order for a true modern military to take control and come out on top.
I believe that your UAVs are pure fantasy, as the space required for everything you have mentioned would be astronomical, and this job can be done much better coordinated with a simple AWACS and some strike squadrons and some ground troops, you can't win a ground war without ground troops, and last time I checked, all wars seem to take place on the ground.
Now I'm just being anal and touching up on alot of technical details, but don't get me wrong, I totally understand exactly how you're thinking, and at first it seems like a good idea, but if you think further into it, and the different components of it, then you begin to realize exactly where and why this will go wrong.
A few things to ponder, maybe you can come up with a revised version of your strategy, only less dependent on UAVs, and a technology which is still in the concept stage.
Shattered OUT...
You asked how my UAVs would use nuclear power. I don't think you understand. A nuclear power plant is used as a power source for a main laser which fires a beam which in turn powers a UAV through light propulsion.
Also light propulsion has been used in air craft by NASA. Ill find a link.
Originally posted by gfad
OK ... so you are going to build a nuclear power plant on every battle field??
That is just totally impractical and why does it have to be nuclear power? Because it is relatively new tech?
Quick lets go to Iraq ... build a new nuclear power plant ... then we can go to WAR!!
Secondly I dont think your idea of firing a laser at a craft to power it would ever work. Your idea of a laser engine has never been flown or tested. It would require a VERY accurate, mobile and fast reacting laser on the ground and optics inside the UCAV which Im not even sure are possible.