 |
reply posted on 14-1-2006 @ 04:27 PM by Nakash
|
Illmatic, the Mahdi you describe curiously enough fit's to the last description the Christian antichrist! Thanks for filling in that the temple
Antichrist will sit in during the 7 year period is actually a rebuilt mosque and not the old temple. Now it all makes sense. I highly suggest you be
vigilant about this Mahdi, it's too much of a coincidence that your Mahdi is scripture's son of perdition which will attempt to rule the World from
Jerusalem and (try to) kill the Jews and the core group of Christians who see his deception. This is too much of a coincidence.
Check this out:
answering-islam.org...
answering-islam.org.uk...
Scary. This Mahdi (a concept found in 7th-8th century Muslim Hadiths) fit's the prophet Daniel's (a writer nearly a millenium older than the
Hadiths) physical, theological descriptions to the last detail. It's amazing. Interestingly, the Antichrist of Muslim Hadiths also resembles the true
Christ in one aspect- he returns at the end to combat the Mahdi. This Mahdi is going to get shot or wounded in the head in year 3.5 of his reign. He
will come back to life (not die). This will be when his reign strengthens.
[edit on 14-1-2006 by Nakash]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 14-1-2006 @ 10:52 PM by spamandham
|
Originally posted by SimonGray
CHRISTIAN PASTORS, 
I know this post was made years ago, but since the thread has been resurrected, it's fair to point out problems in the OP nonetheless.
At the time this was supposedly written (1651), did Catholics recognize protestant pastors as Christians? ...anachronism
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 14-1-2006 @ 11:01 PM by Nakash
|
That was the first thing I thought when I read who wrote this prophecy, but it is half right nonetheless.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 14-1-2006 @ 11:03 PM by spamandham
|
Originally posted by Nakash
That was the first thing I thought when I read who wrote this prophecy, but it is half right nonetheless. 
If it's written after the fact, half right is a rather poor grade.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 21-1-2006 @ 03:22 PM by Nakash
|
It was written 4 centuries before the date it talk's about. How can that be bad?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 21-1-2006 @ 04:42 PM by Netchicken
|
It may be a hoax ....
www.orthodoxwiki.org...
The Prophecy of St. Nilus is an apocryphal work of uncertain origin (thus often referred to as the Prophecy of Pseudo-Nilus) predicting the apocalypse
to occur in the 19th or 20th century (depending on the version of the text). As there are serious problems with the text, it is clear that it was
either not written by St. Nilus or that it has been altered in translation. With the advent of the Internet, the work has taken on the status of urban
legend.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 21-1-2006 @ 04:58 PM by spamandham
|
Originally posted by Nakash
It was written 4 centuries before the date it talk's about. How can that be bad? 
If there is an anachronism, that's rather significant evidence it was written later. Even if it were a true prophecy, the authorwould still not use
the anachronism of referring to heretics (from his perspective) as Christians.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 21-1-2006 @ 05:31 PM by bushfriend
|
i agree with jedi master, the iraq's would never ally with iran and nor will iran be able to aquaire or afford weopons powerful enough to defeat the
west. This is obviously biased towards the muslims idea of the end days, but not to say there havn't been some crazy christian end of days
propocies.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 21-1-2006 @ 06:01 PM by Simon_the_byron
|
All I know for sure is that a Jewish pope would in all likelihood annoy a large amount of Muslims.
But I pray to God that it doesn't end in war.
Perhaps George Galloway is the European ally of the Muslims. He's in the Big Brother House now in England, I hope it doesn't change his basic
principles. He seems like a man with a lot of respect for the suffering of others.
*Edited for possible mistakes.
[edit on 21-1-2006 by Simon_the_byron]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 22-1-2006 @ 12:24 AM by spamandham
|
Originally posted by Simon_the_byron
All I know for sure is that a Jewish pope would in all likelihood annoy a large amount of Muslims. 
I suspect it would annoy a large number of Catholics as well.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 22-1-2006 @ 11:21 AM by Simon_the_byron
|
I suspect it might annoy everyone that holds on to a religion dearly and doesn't hold on to love dearly enough.
Could it start a war? Certainly.
Am I worried about the possibility or war? Yes.
Which is why I think it would be an awful/ dangerous idea.
People often let religion get in the way of love.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 30-1-2008 @ 12:18 AM by helen670
|
Hi and thank you Simon for bringing this one back!
reply to member on St John of Kronstandt///.......
St. John of Kronstadt was born in the village of Soura in North Russia in 1829. He was loved by both rich and poor, by noblemen and beggars...
St John of Kronstadt also saw a vision of the Antichrist....
The Holy and Righteous John of Kronstadt recalled this vision which he had in January of 1901
After evening prayers I laid down to rest a little in my dimly lit cell since I was fatigued. Hanging before the icon of the Mother of God was my lit
lampada.
Not more than a half hour had passed when I heard a soft rustle. Someone touched my left shoulder, and in a tender voice said to me,
"Arise servant of God John and follow the will of God!"
I arose and saw near the window a glorious starets1 (elder) with frosty grey hair, wearing a black mantia, and holding a staff in his hand.
He looked at me tenderly and I could scarcely keep from falling because of my great fear. My hands and feet trembled, and I wanted to speak, but my
tongue would not obey me.
The starets made the sign of the cross over me, and calm and joy soon came over me. Then I made the sign of the cross myself.
He then pointed to the western wall of my cell with his staff in order that I should notice a certain spot.
The starets had inscribed on the wall the following numbers: 1913, 1914, 1917, 1922, 1924, and 1934.
Suddenly the wall vanished, and I walked with the starets toward a green field and saw a mass of crosses thousands standing as gravemarkers.

ssppoc.org..." target="_blank" class="postlink">LINK
IX
helen
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 24-2-2008 @ 03:16 AM by helen670
|
Hi/
Here's more I found on Saint Nilus/
Note. 1917 is precisely the year of the Deposition of the Orthodox Emperor, and the end of the flow of Slavic monks to Athos, which caused a decline
of more than 50% in number, and a worse spiritual invasion of " Modernists."
Perhaps the worst of these is Bartholomeos, elected in 1992, who hates Sacred Tradition, and is striving every single day to achieve union with every
kind of heretic, Papist, Anglican, Monophysite, Nestorian or whatever, since he is a disciple of Freemasonry. Several other evil events came to pass
in 1992 ( 7,500 A.C.

orthodoxchristian.blogspot.com...
More information Here
Thus St. Nilus the Myrrh-gusher prophesied: "On the seal will be written the following: 'I am yours.' 'Yes, you are mine.' 'I go willingly, not
by force.' 'And I accept you in accordance with your will, and not by force.' These are four utterances, or inscriptions, which will be written in
the middle of this accursed seal...”

Saint Kosmas(16th century) and Elder Paisios(+1994) prophecy....Prophecy concerning the BALKANS,Russia,Cyprus, Greece and Turkey.....
PDF files...
pigizois.net...
IX
helen
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 24-2-2008 @ 03:23 AM by Incarnated
|
This is not a Prophecy. It's a vague rephrasing of statements made thousands of years before. It's also a weaker and less intresting rephrasing.
It's more like "bad bad bad" then anything else. It's a church thumping statement over the power of personalized spirituality.
Also needless to say, or so it seems to me, that it actually has very little if nothing to do with the true word of God over the orginaztion of the
state of church.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 24-2-2008 @ 03:58 AM by helen670
|
Originally posted by Incarnated
This is not a Prophecy. It's a vague rephrasing of statements made thousands of years before. It's also a weaker and less intresting rephrasing.
It's more like "bad bad bad" then anything else. It's a church thumping statement over the power of personalized spirituality.
Also needless to say, or so it seems to me, that it actually has very little if nothing to do with the true word of God over the orginaztion of the
state of church. 
Hi/
Sure it is a prophecy!
What is a ''bad bad bad'' ???
......personalized spirituality?
Actually THIS is Ancient Christianity.
The monk and the Elder that I refer to above, are followers of prayer,fasting and living according to the Word of God!
as was in the Early church...
You, on the other hand, are SUPPOSEDLY an(oops)I mean, THE ''Archangel Michael'' and what more can I say......
Humble...
YOU...
are NOT!!!
In the writing of the above prophecy, there is no self made Scripture added, nor is there added mumbo jumbo of what you so very much seem to go
into!
IX
helen
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 24-2-2008 @ 06:23 AM by Pellevoisin
|
I remember reading many beautiful things from St. Nilus in an old Orthodox prayer book of my great-grandmother. I also recall reading frightening
things as well -- although now I am not frightened, perhaps just resigned to watching the world crumble under its delusions of technological
achievement.
May St. Nilus the Myrrh-bearer pray for us, weak and sinful, that we may greet the Day of Christ with joy. Amen.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |