posted on Aug, 3 2006 @ 05:05 PM
Not sure but strikes me as having more to do with some Congressional kind of debate rather than one open to the public. And honestly I'm glad that
they didn't have any public debate back then, as more scientific looks from the conspiracy angle are just now signing on, aside from people like
The Commission on the collapses was ridiculous, and they didn't even freaking mention WTC7. Reported the WTC Towers as essentially having no core
structure at all, etc.
I seriously doubt they'd have been up for any real debate there, except against the stupid old farts in our Congress, that were raising more hell
about how our investigations were cut short and no arrests were made before the attacks than anything else.