It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Syria moving into position

page: 2
0
<< 1    3  4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 4 2006 @ 12:10 PM
link   
makeitso

If the people in Lebanon are so opposed to Hezbollah then why Hezbollah has won their way through the government even having two sits in it?

Did they took them by force or they were elected by the people?

See is many stories and many facts to consider when it comes as who and why supports who.

Then you see that Lebanon is not friend of Israel either and when it comes to choose sides with and aggressor between Hezbollah and Israel you bet that Hezbollah is going to win.

I see it as a lot of propaganda been pushed to make things confuse.

If the Lebanese people were so against Hezbollah how come they are not fighting alone side of Israel to push them out?

I wonder.

Then in my opinion it comes as a master plan to get the entire region in disarray to blame Syria and Iran and bring US into it.

I will never stop believing that all of this nothing that a power grab for the oil in Iran and taking away the theocracy to bring down the second enemy of Israel Iran because if you have not forgotten Iraq what the first. funny how things tend to go into the background.

It seems that all roads lead to Iran.




posted on Aug, 5 2006 @ 06:23 AM
link   
I am a little dubious about that site, considering they said this:




Damascus is strengthening its border with Lebanon and along the Syrian border with Israel's Golan Heights.


Golan Heights ARE NOT, in any definition of the word, Israeli. They are Syrian.

Me thinks this site is a little Pro-Israel and has an agenda.



posted on Aug, 5 2006 @ 06:26 AM
link   

Originally posted by princeofpeace
Anyone know if Syria is still moving into position? Israel has been striking VERY close to the Syrian border today and still nothing. Do all these fanatical Musilm leaders just talk a bunch smack only to let the terrorists carry out their bidding because they are too scared?


Boycott MUSLIMS


Dude, I really, really, really wish you wouldn't comment on topics you quite obviously know NOTHING about.

Fanatical Muslims in charge of Syria!!??

Oh dear...



posted on Aug, 5 2006 @ 10:58 AM
link   

Originally posted by Rockpuck

Originally posted by marg6043
Some people in these boards has claim that Hezbollah group are cowards and that they hide behind the population . . .

The leader of Hezbollah has dared Israel to a ground conflict . . .

When you have fighter jets and state of the art weaponry thanks to your biggest supporter supplying to you . . .

You don't need to do anything but keep the arrogance and claim that the evil Axis of evil are the ones causing the death of the Innocent.

Then you dare to become angry when what you consider a group of terrorist get weapons from the only group that support them.

How about a nice ground war without US technology

The winner takes all be Israel or Hezbollah.


Agreed! No more hiding behind civilians, no more fancy airplanes, no more fancy advanced guns! We oughta go back to beating eachother with sticks and sharp metal things in the middle of open fields.



HAHAHA Good one. Wars arent supposed to be "fair". Fair gets more people killed and makes wars much longer.
A ground assault wold give Hez a better chance but they still wouldnt win, it would just be a much longer bloodier war fo both sides.



posted on Aug, 5 2006 @ 02:24 PM
link   

Golan Heights ARE NOT, in any definition of the word, Israeli. They are Syrian.

Me thinks this site is a little Pro-Israel and has an agenda.



I completely agree with you here and it may be that the site is a little Pro-Israeli, however although the international community officially recognises the Golan Heights as Syrian territory, the fact is it is still under Israeli occupation.


en.wikipedia.org...


The question here is, if Syria decided to take back occupation of an area of land that the international community itself admits is Syrian territory; would the international community support Syria? After all it does belong to them not Israel.

Something tells me the answer is no and Israel would most likely consider this as a full scale attack on Israel even though the land in question does not belong to them and would probably lashout in fear that there would be further attacks from Iran who has gone on the record as saying it will support Syria.

This is just my own opinion, but I am interested to see what you all think, it may even warrent its own thread.

Does Syria have the right to retake occupation of the Golan Height?


.



posted on Aug, 6 2006 @ 01:26 AM
link   
I have it on reliable intel (friend in SF) that he and a couple of US SF teams just got covertly deployed to Syria, Mission unknown. Wonder if it has anything to do with the Syrian buildup.



posted on Aug, 6 2006 @ 09:02 AM
link   
Thanks for the update keep us informed of any further intel. as and when is becomes available.

The Jerusalem Post has just released a story quoting Syrian foreign minister as saying "Syria is ready for the possibility of a regional war if the Israeli aggression continues."

He went on further to mention that "If Israel attacks Syria by any mean, on the ground, by air, our leadership ordered the armed forces to reply immediately,".

Full story available from link below

www.jpost.com...


.



posted on Aug, 6 2006 @ 10:33 AM
link   
I wonder why Israel doesn't send fighter jets to Buzz the president of Syrias house now? Aren't they holding the prisoners?



posted on Aug, 7 2006 @ 01:12 PM
link   
The SF team just got back and my source told me that they were indeed in the Golan area assessing the build up of troops and equipment close to the border.

He told me that they are amassing between 30 - 50k troops on the border, they do not have heavy artillery yet, that they saw.

Most of this came from direct observations as well as local intel.

I would not doubt if the SF team went back soon.



posted on Aug, 7 2006 @ 06:21 PM
link   
that's in the ball-park of what I have been told. If we know this, I am sur the IDF is watching with true and genuine interest.



posted on Aug, 7 2006 @ 06:37 PM
link   
Go to it, I say. Syria has every right to retake the Golan Heights, according to the UN, so in theory, we should all be backing them.

After all, didn't we send an army of over 1 million men to liberate Kuwait when it was invaded? Where is the Army massed to assist Syria?



posted on Aug, 7 2006 @ 07:03 PM
link   
Personally i dont think Syria is gonna do squat unless they are attacked but i think they are too candy to do anything on their own.

This article from Debka (yeah i know) surely implies something new on Syria that the rest of the news hasnt picked up or wont pick up on. I think the world is so scared of Iran and Syria getting mixed into all this that they are under reporting things.

www.debka.com...



posted on Aug, 7 2006 @ 07:23 PM
link   

Originally posted by princeofpeace
Personally i dont think Syria is gonna do squat unless they are attacked but i think they are too candy to do anything on their own.

This article from Debka (yeah i know) surely implies something new on Syria that the rest of the news hasnt picked up or wont pick up on. I think the world is so scared of Iran and Syria getting mixed into all this that they are under reporting things.

www.debka.com...


Why would you say scared? Just because other countries refuse to bite at israels constant bantering about Syria and Iran supplying Hizbollah with arms? People are not going to send their kids to die just because Hizbollah is doing the very same thing Israel is on a much smaller scale. Israel used to find them to be excellent arms trading customers before when they suited Israels purpose of fighting with Iraq. People get smart when they are used, and why America continues to let it happen is beyond me.



posted on Aug, 7 2006 @ 07:50 PM
link   
I say candy because their leaders are always talking smack in front of a microphone but do nothing directly to back it up. Plus these are the same folks who think they will have 21 virgins or some sh!t waiting for them in heaven so why would they be afraid to send their children into battle? Especially against the Zionists. While we're on the topic, why does Iran supply Hezbo with missles,ammo, drones etc but Iran wont face Israel straight up? Because they're candy.



posted on Aug, 7 2006 @ 08:20 PM
link   

Originally posted by princeofpeace
I say candy because their leaders are always talking smack in front of a microphone but do nothing directly to back it up. Plus these are the same folks who think they will have 21 virgins or some sh!t waiting for them in heaven so why would they be afraid to send their children into battle? Especially against the Zionists. While we're on the topic, why does Iran supply Hezbo with missles,ammo, drones etc but Iran wont face Israel straight up? Because they're candy.


Keeping in line with the topic, ie Syria, I think your misinformed to think that the Syrian leadership is anywhere near fundamentalist.

They're Batthist, thats Pan-Arab nationalists and actually go to great lengths to quash extremeism.



posted on Aug, 7 2006 @ 08:33 PM
link   
They go to a great length to squash extremism but they support Hizballah who is a terrorist entity that has used suicide bombers in the past. This is not extreme? Wow.



posted on Aug, 7 2006 @ 08:41 PM
link   

Originally posted by princeofpeace
They go to a great length to squash extremism but they support Hizballah who is a terrorist entity that has used suicide bombers in the past. This is not extreme? Wow.


When did Hezbollah use suicide bombers? I am interested to know....

EDIT: Also, wether they are extremists or not (which they are not), Syria is only a minor backer compared to Iran. Syria backs them as they oppose Israel, not because they share similar ideals.

[edit on 7/8/06 by stumason]



posted on Aug, 7 2006 @ 09:18 PM
link   
How about this for starters?

www.worldnetdaily.com...



posted on Aug, 7 2006 @ 09:33 PM
link   

Originally posted by princeofpeace
How about this for starters?

www.worldnetdaily.com...



HAHAHAHAHA..I was waiting for that and it makes it all the more amusing you had to use WND to back you up...

It has never even been remotely proven that Hezbollah did that..

One major flaw in the US claims is that Hezbollah was formed in 1985........


I think you'll find it is commonly agreed that Islamic Jihad (a Palestinian group) that did it.



posted on Aug, 7 2006 @ 09:45 PM
link   
So Islamic Jihad are terrorist but Hizballah are not?

[edit on 7-8-2006 by princeofpeace]




top topics



 
0
<< 1    3  4 >>

log in

join