It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by timeless test
Nope. The sad part is that people who do not know the facts of a scenario are prepared to criticise the police and predict someting close to the collapse of modern society based on one newspaper article from an organ that is far from unbiased.
Originally posted by Regenmacher
...fine example of Orwellian brainwashing
In a statement, West Midlands Police said the officer visited the street following complaints not only about large areas of the pavement being left chalked but also after numerous complaints about anti-social behaviour in the area.
Superintendent Stuart Johnson, operations manager at Halesowen police station, said: 'I support the actions of my officers who responded to complaints from the public about "kids destroying" an ornamental cherry tree by stripping every branch from it, in an area where there have been reports of anti-social behaviour.
...
West Midlands Police deals robustly with anti-social behaviour. By targeting what may seem relatively low-level crime we aim to prevent it developing into more serious matters.'
West Midlands Police community support officers asked parents in Spring Street in Halesowen to remove chalk markings after complaints about them.
...
The children washed some of the markings away but said they were determined to carry on playing.
Originally posted by Regenmacher
Don't worry, goes the typically British assurance: our powers may be draconian, but decency and common sense will ensure we don't overuse them.
Children's hopscotch and tree branch gathering are now considered criminal behavoir in the UK.
Originally posted by timeless test
Please tell me which Briton or branch of British government actually made this statement - or did you make it up yourself?
Originally posted by timeless test
No they're not, that's why none of the children involved were charged with any offence. Have you been accepting what the media tells you without questioning it again?
Anti-Social Behaviour Order -wiki
Although these are civil orders, the behaviour complained of must be proved to the criminal standard. It should be noted that a little known Scots Law, Lawburrows, enables a summary action before a Sheriff with only the civil standard of proof that the pursuer was likely to be put in fear - on the balance of probability, no witness apart from the pursurer, no court record, etc. and a bond lodged in court immediately, to be forfeit should the pursuer be put in fear subsequently. Although narrower than ASBO, the aim of Lawburrows is "...to prevent such delinquences and terrify evil doers.
A MORI opinion poll published on 9 June 2005 found that 82% of the British public were in favour of ASBOs, however only 39% believed they were effective in their current form.
Some critics of the ASBO system argue that it criminalises behaviour that is otherwise lawful. Other parties have voiced concerns about the open-ended nature of ASBO penalties - that is, there is little restriction on what a court may impose as the terms of the ASBO, and little restriction on what can be designated as antisocial behaviour. Theoretically, they argue, it is possible to impose indefinite house arrest on an individual who has Tourette's syndrome or has an unusual hairstyle[13]. This is compounded by the fact that individuals can be jailed for up to five years if they break the terms of their ASBO.
Anti-social behaviour has a wide legal definition – to paraphrase the Crime and Disorder Act 1998, it is behaviour which causes or is likely to cause harassment, alarm or distress to one or more people who are not in the same household as the perpetrator. Among the forms it can take are:
--graffiti – which can on its own make even the tidiest urban spaces look squalid
--abusive and intimidating language, too often directed at minorities
--excessive noise, particularly late at night
--fouling the street with litter
--drunken behaviour in the streets, and the mess it creates
--dealing drugs, with all the problems to which it gives rise.
All these are issues which concern everyone in the community. They cannot be written off as generational issues – they impact on the quality of life of young and old alike. And they require a response which puts partnership into action.
Originally posted by WyrdeOne
voxel
Do you have any idea how ridiculous it sounds when you say, in so many words, that kids who build tree-forts are more likely to grow up to be rapists?