It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by shanemcbain
Ok first things first,
This 'claim' does not prove the fact that plane parts from a 757 were found at the wreckage of the pentagon crash. It also doesn't reverse the 100 people claiming that an American Airlines 757 hit the building.
Originally posted by S1LV3R4D0
To show just how fragile a jet engine is, may i reference the flight deck technician sucked into the cowling of the ea6b and surviving due to his helmet destroying the fan blades before his body got there. It wouldnt take a wall to do it, more like a small chunk of regular old concrete could do it. Just thought id add that to the discussion for reference.
that seemes to be the most likely story iv seen i got my money on that this is what happend
Originally posted by HardToGet
After just seeing the news about the Pentagon deception taking shape, another rather interesting development, be it less mainstream.
Nearly five years after the terror attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, an eyewitness from the Pentagon has come forth with testimony, which, if accurate, debunks the official version that a hijacked Boeing 757 flew into the five-sided military fortress housing the Department of Defense.
Samuel D. Danner, a civilian pilot and electrical engineer from Hagerstown, Md, says he was try to get out of Washington on the morning of 9-11 after hearing of the attacks on the World Trade Center. Having made a wrong turn, Danner wound up heading south on Washington Blvd, the highway that passes the western side of the Pentagon, from where he says he observed the approaching aircraft involved in the attack.
Danner, who estimates that he was less than 500 feet from the path of this aircraft, noted that it was very quiet: "There wasn't the roar noise that you get with a jet at full throttle. This thing knew how to fly quietly--I mean I could hear the whine and I knew it was jet powered." Danner's description of the aircraft's small size is confirmed by early eyewitness reports. One witness, Steve Riskus, has previously confirmed to AFP that the plane was very quiet.
"There was a four-engine jet above us," Danner said, which looked to him like a Boeing 707 or a DC-8 at about 15,000. feet. He said this plane may have been controlling the windowless drone, which struck the Pentagon, by "flying it by camera." Danner noticed that people at the Pentagon were aware of this plane over head.
Danner said he had contacted some of the people he met on th lawn of the Pentagon to encourage them to come forward with their testimony.
Danner says the aircraft flew with remarkable precision as it leveled off and went right into the southwestern facade of the Pentagon. The impact created a "brilliant white flash" that he described as "a phosphorous kind of flash. "This suggest the UAV carried explosives or a depleted uranium (DU) missile. If a DU missile was used, this could explain the source of Danner's lymphoma. If he was contaminated by DU at the Pentagon crash sit, the other people in the proximity would also have been affected.
Things are heating up.... I´ll bet before 2006 is over, a new and full investigation will have started...
I sincerely hope so.
EDIT: A few more (alas) non mainstream sources. Different words, same story.
It is also worth mentioning that Danner was personally involved in the cleanup of the lawn. See picture in first additional source.
[edit on 2-8-2006 by HardToGet]
Why has the government offered no proof, after all they are the only ones who can 100% show a plane hitting the pentagon.
Originally posted by Quackmaster
Yes, I know sarcasm is the lowest form of humour/intelligence, but why do all these witnesses appear years later with no proof?
Originally posted by snafu7700
at the time, he worked in the section that was hit...just pure dumb luck that he was late for work that day. i dont know his exact location at the time, but he swears that he saw a b757 with AA markings slam into the pentagon. like i said, i cant provide anything even remotely resembling proof to back up his story, but he is someone i trust implicitly.
"Where are they (the witnesses)? others keep saying that here, and using this as fact to back up the 'official story'