The 1% evidence thread

There is a post on the ufo board called I just want 1% proof!
It was posted by sneakiod and can be found here
www.abovetopsecret.com...

While this is a valid thread and title I feel there could be many 1% threads like
Show me 1% evidence of Bigfoot
Show me 1% evidence of a 911 conspiracy
Show me 1% evidence of the existence of ghosts
and I could go on.

I feel this is what ATS is all about ,discussion of claim and counter-claim and a coming together of people so that you can read the facts/alleged facts and draw your own conclusions.

Well this is just my opinion and is in no-way an attack on the existing thread,just an observation,feel free to post your own thoughts.

What are you saying?

That the majority of threads on ATS should be like this, should not be like this or already are like this?

There is a post on the ufo board called I just want 1% proof!

Originally posted by kuhl
Show me 1% evidence of a 911 conspiracy

Joking Right???

Originally posted by kuhl
Show me 1% evidence of the existence of ghosts

I feel this is what ATS is all about ,discussion of claim and counter-claim and a coming together of people so that you can read the facts/alleged facts and draw your own conclusions.

Well this is just my opinion and is in no-way an attack on the existing thread, just an observation, feel free to post your own thoughts.

I did point out that any proof is 100% proof.
sorry about being vague.

I would like the name of the person who will be calculating what "percent proof" a given person is providing on a topic. Because that person who determines that number is the "go to guy". That means he has to have ALL of the proof to compare to.

I don't think somebody thought this through.

What i did see though was days after i posted that thread, about 5 or 6 new threads
were posted on the very same subject without even replying to mine!

A way to harvest more points maybe?

Originally posted by Valhall
I would like the name of the person who will be calculating what "percent proof" a given person is providing on a topic. Because that person who determines that number is the "go to guy". That means he has to have ALL of the proof to compare to.

I don't think somebody thought this through.

Meaning what?

I think the nasa smoking gun videos are about 35.7% proof.

video.google.com...

video.google.com...

There you go dude, more than 1%

Case closed.

Read my sig.

More than your 1% proof there on 9/11.. depending who you are talking to I guess tho.

On a side note, the sig there has had not 1 thread to prove these links wrong. so I would consider that 100% proof. I added this sig about 5 months ago.

[edit on 8/9/2006 by ThichHeaded]

Originally posted by thesneakiod

Originally posted by Valhall
I would like the name of the person who will be calculating what "percent proof" a given person is providing on a topic. Because that person who determines that number is the "go to guy". That means he has to have ALL of the proof to compare to.

I don't think somebody thought this through.

Meaning what?

Meaning what? What are you trying to trap me? Meaning it's one of the more silly statements I've ever heard, that's what. You can't discern the "percent of truth" unless you already have the "whole truth" to gage it against. It's ridiculous...do you need more feedback?

So out of all the statement you have ever heard that was the most silliest ever?

Maybe you should get out more.

Silly title or not, people knew what i meant even if it was worded wrong.

No doubt i will be warned or banned now for defending myself against such a
derogatory and uncalled for statement.