It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
www.whatreallyhappened.com...
And remember, we do not have ALL the tapes.
Audio tapes of interviews with air traffic controllers on-duty on 9/11 were intentionally destroyed by crushing the cassette by hand, cutting the tape into little pieces, and then dropping the pieces in different trash cans around the building.
Originally posted by twitchy
www.whatreallyhappened.com...
And remember, we do not have ALL the tapes.
Audio tapes of interviews with air traffic controllers on-duty on 9/11 were intentionally destroyed by crushing the cassette by hand, cutting the tape into little pieces, and then dropping the pieces in different trash cans around the building.
Originally posted by Masisoar
Just to chime in a bit, funny how the 757 accused of hitting the Pentagon went into quite a huge bank at "full thrust". The engines managed to stay on.
Try to refute it, I dare you.
Source
Tape of Air Traffic Controllers Made on 9/11 Was Destroyed
*Please Note: Archive articles do not include photos, charts or graphics. More information.
May 7, 2004, Friday
By MATTHEW L. WALD (NYT); National Desk
Late Edition - Final, Section A, Page 29, Column 2, 624 words
DISPLAYING FIRST 50 OF 624 WORDS -At least six air traffic controllers who dealt with two of the hijacked airliners on Sept. 11, 2001, made a tape recording a few hours later describing the events, but the tape was destroyed by a supervisor without anyone making a transcript or even listening to it,
Originally posted by twitchy
It was on the news bubba, if I remember correctly it was CNN, Newsweek, and the New York times I cited in the thread I linked originally, and who said anything about the FAA, it wasn't the FAA, it was ATC's (air traffic control) conversations with various pilots which were destroyed. Unless you contend the FAA records all the ATC's individual radio communications... I'm glad you find it hysterical though, the rest of the world found it pretty damned disturbing. Would you like some more sources, or is the NYTimes good enough for you?
At least six air traffic controllers who dealt with two of the hijacked airliners on Sept. 11, 2001, made a tape recording a few hours later describing the events, but the tape was destroyed by a supervisor without anyone making a transcript or even listening to it, the Transportation
Unless you contend the FAA records all the ATC's individual radio communications
Originally posted by twitchy
www.whatreallyhappened.com...
And remember, we do not have ALL the tapes.
Audio tapes of interviews with air traffic controllers on-duty on 9/11 were intentionally destroyed by crushing the cassette by hand, cutting the tape into little pieces, and then dropping the pieces in different trash cans around the building.
Originally posted by twitchy
How about the security tapes from the airports, they not unionized?
Originally posted by snafu7700
that's absolutely hilarious twitchy....especially when you consider that the FAA has been using electronic recording of air traffic for about ten years now (ie no tape to "crush the cassette by hand" or "cut the tape"). where do you get this garbage?
Originally posted by bsbray11
You were using this as an excuse for how debris was carried so far away, and were obviously mistaken. Be a man and leave things in context.
Originally posted by bsbray11
So then you're saying a 1 ton engine core did bounce off the ground and land 2000 feet away in a forest?
Originally posted by bsbray11
No, it's impossible for you to discuss "facts" with me because you're having a hard time being objective.
Originally posted by bsbray11
Probably because he felt the breeze that day and had a good idea of exactly how far 6 to 8 miles is.
Originally posted by bsbray11
Where have I disputed the existance of smaller pieces of debris? This is a weak straw-man.
Originally posted by bsbray11
Could you please make some sense out of this argument for me? I've just posted a picture of the cloud produced by the crash, and there appears not to have been any significant breeze affecting the cloud. I can't make out how this is supposed to be a response to that observation.
Originally posted by Muaddib
If anyone is not being objective around here is you bsb, you obviously have proven with every thread you have written so far that you can't even come up with one argument that makes sense. You want to pin everything down to "it was done by the U.S. government"... Quoting from sites which only purpose is to use anything and everything for propaganda, even if it means posting arguments which make no sense and are obviously bs, does not make you an expert, and does not make you right.
Originally posted by Muaddib
Look what site he quoted from....whatreallyhappened.com.... Sometimes I don't know whether to laugh or feel pity because of some of the things some members post....