Originally posted by cryingindian
Thanks for your time and I hope I’ve made sense.
Nice post cryingindian
I have often thought along the same lines
The attacks of September 11 were part of the biggest crime in recent US history. You would have thought that would warrant one of the largest, no
expenses spared, criminal investigations mankind has ever seen
Instead we get Bush stalling for an enquiry, and finally the 9/11 Commission Whitewash and the NIST report - both attempts to bolster and reinforce
the official rush to judgement conclusions (shades of JFK and the Warren Commission there) and both (by their own remit) not likely to cover all
aspects of a proper thorough investigation
The commission concluded in part that a series of failings allowed the hijackers to carry out there plans and yet no one was fired or reprimanded, no
resignations - no one in the Bush Admin, the White House staff, CIA, FBI, NATO, NORAD, Pentagon staff - no one!
If I were a US citizen I would want to know exactly who the hijackers were, where they were, where they came from and who did what (within reason) and
an official timeline of events that isn’t contradictory.
I would love to see any existing CCTV footage of the hijackers checking in, boarding the planes - anything in fact to show that these men existed and
did what we are told they did.
I don’t know of a shred of evidence of this calibre that has been realised to the media. Hell - even the famous Pentagon footage doesn’t even show
a plane for definite!
The only sure thing you can say for sure is on that terrible day two planes hit two towers and the towers fell down and a helluva lot of people died
in a large scale tragedy.
The rest of the official story is just that – A STORY. It may be true, but if it is I reckon that there would be a lot more proof available.
I think a few years back I saw a black and white CCTV photo of one of the hijackers in an airport car park. That's it! I imagine you will have seen
more stuff on TV over there, but I haven’t heard of it.
Say the official story is true - why did Bush block an investigation? What was he trying to hide? Mere business ties with Bin Laden? Prior knowledge
of the attacks? Or something much more sinister?
Less money spent on 9/11 than the Challenger disaster investigation? Fishy. Very fishy.
One thing just struck me - perhaps the official story is 100% true but the only solid evidence and footage is from covert surveillance by one or more
intelligence agencies of the hijackers and that is why we have not been presented with it – because that would prove PRIOR KNOWLEDGE OF THE ATTACKS