Death to Everyone!, page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 31-7-2006 @ 10:49 AM by zorgon
Originally posted by dgtemp
When you look at all the Muslims in this world and you see how many want us dead, its only but a tiny few.
Nothing we can't take care of.


Agree that it is just a few, and those few want each other dead too, and are killing more Iraqi citizens than our troups. But it seems it is a problem that we are having some trouble "taking care of"



They don't hate us, they hate the world they live in and have no choice but to blame us for that world. It is not an option to blame their own leaders or even themselves for not having the courage to change it.

The west did not deliver them unto misery, but the west is the only one they can safely blame for it.


Very true. It gives them a common enemy to blame, but each sect of the terrorist/insurgents really just wants control of Iraq {or which ever country they happen to favor} They would wipe each other out if they could.

But they all love our American Dollars...


Maybe if we stopped buying their oil and switched to better energy sources, sold those resources to the Chinese and Europe { what a boost for our economy that would be} they wouldn't have money to buy big war toys and WMDs, and would have to go back to swords and knives.

It really bothers me that Saudi people live tax free and all own a Mercedes when I get zapped at the gas pumps. Tell em to stick their oil. Maybe then we can reason with them.

I doubt it though... they have been at this since before Jesus was born... 2000 years is a long time to hold a grudge.


reply posted on 31-7-2006 @ 11:09 AM by makeitso
DG
its only but a tiny few.


DG
Its only a tiny few.


DJ
not all Musliims are terrorists! But with a billion out there even if 0.5% are, you've still got a major problem.


I guess I am weird, because when I see words like "its a tiny few", and 0.5%, I am inclined to do a bit of research in an attempt to better understand the conflict.

Perhaps that is what I love about this site the most. It forces me to review things that I would have never thought about and search deeper for more information on both sides of the fence. In that light,kudos to all who post here!

As is usual in these matters, it appears that both of you are somewhat correct.

Here are the results of a survey from Indonisia about Muslim views on violence.


INDONESIA: SURVEY REVEALS MUSLIM VIEWS ON VIOLENCE

Up to 1.3 percent of Indonesian Muslims nationwide admit using violence against people or objects they consider contradictory to their beliefs

Acts of violence in the survey on religion and violence by the Center for Islamic and Social Studies (PPIM) ranged from 0.1 percent of respondents admitting their involvement in demolishing or arson of churches constructed without official permits, to 1.3 percent who committed "intimidation" against those they considered had blasphemed Islam.


So in that respect, DG is correct. Only a tiny bit admit to using violence.


INDONESIA: SURVEY REVEALS MUSLIM VIEWS ON VIOLENCE

The percentage looks very small but it is very high in its real figure when you note that 85 percent, or 200 million, of the country's 230 million population are Muslims

The survey found 43.5 percent of respondents were ready to wage war on threatening non-Muslim groups

40 percent would use violence against those blaspheming Islam and 14.7 percent would tear down churches without official permits.

between 30 percent and 58 percent approved of amputation of the left hand for thieves and the stoning to death of rapists, as well as other tenets of sharia law, and opposed the election of non-Muslims for president.


So in this respect, DJ is right. The actual numbers are not that small. You've still got a major problem.

What did a simultaneous survey discover about the cause of the Muslim attitude toward violence? Is it because of Bush? The U.N.? Israel? Oil?


INDONESIA: SURVEY REVEALS MUSLIM VIEWS ON VIOLENCE

the reasons for the results found Islamic teaching and Islamism made the most significant contributions to violent behavior.

Simplistic understanding of Islamic teachings and the introduction of so-called "yellow books", detailing Islamic law and regulations, in Islamic boarding schools contributed to the emergence of hard-line groups, the issuance of sharia bylaws and sowed hostility toward non-Muslims.

The more Muslims give their support for certain Islamic teachings legitimizing the use of violence, the more violence will happen.


So yes, there is a problem with Muslim violence. Yes it appears to be a small percent of Muslims. Yes, that percent is actually a huge number. Yes, it is mostly Muslim terrorism currently. Yes, somebody is pulling the strings, teaching them from a young age to accept and commit violent acts in the name of religion.

Of course, I have limited time for research. These are just a couple of surveys, and they are not from the ME. I'm sure that other views will be raised, and those views help all of us understand each other, and the world. No?


reply posted on 31-7-2006 @ 11:13 AM by hogtie
Originally posted by Mdv2
Then you should know Hezbollah is not a terrorist movement.



Hezbollah pioneered suicide bombing. And by forcing Lebanese to store munitions in their homes, making them targets, is a pretty brutal tactic. I don't imagine that there are civilians lining up to keep explosives under their beds, but what will happen to them if they don't.

I'm off topic.

I think if they should be chanting "death to..." anyone, it should be to anyone who exploits the poverty and ignorance of the people. Religion can do this, governments can do this, industry can do this. But they never know, because they are trapped in a cultural/economic box, and the ones exploiting them for the sake of their own power will never let them see outside of it. What needs to be done is reforming of oppressed societies where they are able to question what they are being fed.

Religion is a perfect example of questioning that which makes no sense. Why can't I question the validity of Islam because it does not seem rational to believe in a being that lives in the sky and rewards with heaven or punishes with hell? As long as I question all faiths, based on logic, there should be no problem. But there is. We've sensitized ourselves into making some things taboo. So we have to be able to say things like "(insert religion here) makes no sense" and it is driving people to do x, y, z, without calling down the wrath of the rest of the world. We have to be able to objectively look at all factors that contribute to the problem - economy, education, and yes, religion. Its safe to say that Judaism, Islam, and Christianity all have to share the blame at this point, to some degree or another.

Ironically, fundamentalists at least have a leg up on moderates. They have no problem saying that another religion is bad. They believe it because their scriptures confirm it. Moderates call for tolerance, when scrutiny is what is really needed.

What I'm getting at, is that if we want this to stop, all of the influences that control the thought of the population must be removed. For Lebanon, that includes the strong-arm of Hezzbollah, the shadow of Israel, and the money interests of foreign countries. In short, they must have freedom. But since none of these factors will go away on their own, since none will give up their power, influence, or money, then it must be done by force.

Israel is helping out with the Hezzbollah factor, and I hope they are removed completely. But then the world must turn to freeing Lebanon from the other factors. The same goes for all oppressed societies.


reply posted on 31-7-2006 @ 12:30 PM by hogtie
Originally posted by xmotex
I would like to see evidence for these claims that Hezbollah is hiding rockets under anyone's beds.

From what I know of Hezbollah's military wing, they are extremely secretive and avoid contact with civilians whenever possible - not out of humanitarianism, but out of fear of collaborators. That doesn't mean they wont pull up into a civilian neighborhood, fire a few rockets, and bugout ASAP, but I am sure they store their weaponry as far from any prying eyes as possible.

Hezbollah's military wing is famous for their low profile - it's been one of the secrets to their success.

[edit on 7/31/06 by xmotex]

I don't have a smoking gun, but I've heard many rumblings (I'm not expecting anyone to take that for more than what it is). I'm piecing things together from things that I know that they've done, such as fire from within neighborhoods, and applying some tactical practicality.

Its SOP in the middle east to hide weapons in mosques and amongst civilians to use as a PR weaons against the hyper-sensitive West. They can do that and still keep it low profile because of the pro-Hezzbollah enclaves, as well as the intimidation factor amongst the civilians. Also, due to Israeli intelligence assets and technology, the weapons couldn't be too far from the launch points in civilian neighborhoods because not only could Israel be more likely to spot them in transit, but be able to discern the location of the weapons cache.

Also


reply posted on 31-7-2006 @ 12:48 PM by xmotex
Well there's the problem for Israel's targeters - these things can be carried from place to place in any truck and stored in any dry hole in the ground - looking at a truck from an aerial drone, there's no way to tell if it's shipping rockets or crates of vegetables. Hence the horrific civilian casualties on Lebanon's roads. As for where the weapons are stored, there's a lot of empty land down there to bury things in, and I suspect the Israeli's bombings of "suspect" civilian sites are missing the rockets entirely.

If you look at the rocket barrages, the number fired have steadily increased since Israel's campaign began - not what you'd expect if Israel's bombing campaign was proving at all effective. I think they're mostly just taking their best guess, taking out a given house, and hoping for the best. I remember the interview with a Lebanese Christian farmer on TV. Two F-16's came over his farm, and with great precision dropped two LGB's - on his well-drilling rigs. PGM's are only effective if your targeting information is accurate. I doubt depriving a farmer of his ability to drill wells to irrigate his fields serves any useful IDF tactical goal. It's just some overworked IDF mission planner looking at a fuzzy, jittery grayscale image from a drone and saying "well, those might be rocket launchers"...

As for what's SOP in the Middle East, Hezbollah are famous for doing things their own way. This isn't Al Quaeda's army of fanatical, unskilled dilletante fanatics we're talking about here, but a large, professional, highly disciplined organization.

So far, it seems they're in large part getting the better of the IDF.
Definitely not SOP for the Middle East

[edit on 7/31/06 by xmotex]
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



On why America is in denial and Ron Paul will not be elected
  Posted 17 days ago with 21 member flags
Study says racists and conservatives are dumb
  Posted 7 days ago with 16 member flags
Is ‘anti-Canadianism’ the new ‘anti-Americanism?’
  Posted 16 days ago with 8 member flags
Clarification on the definition of "natural born citizen"
  Posted 14 days ago with 7 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Free Psychic Readings
  General Chit Chat, Posted 15 hours ago, 110 replies
Hollow Earth Theory New Evidence.
  General Conspiracies, Posted 13 hours ago, 83 replies
Anonymous show your face!
  Rant, Posted 9 hours ago, 62 replies
Free will
  Philosophy and Metaphysics, Posted 17 hours ago, 52 replies