It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by AnAbsoluteCreation
Wrong. I'm sorry to say that is comparing apples to oranges. If Hezz. could strike Israeli strategic targets it would. Hezz doesn't have the smart bomb capability that Israel has (yet they continue to strike civilians and the U.N.) they have mostly mortar shells they are shooting aimlessly. They have very few smart bombs, that most likely come from Iran and Syria. So your point in INVALID! AAC
Originally posted by Snazuolu
BRING EM ON i say!!! Israel, with the help of God will see to it the evil axis of powers are dealt with 1 by 1.
Originally posted by Agit8dChop
My point is, that israel isnt a large piece of land.
Compared to Iran and Syria.
Iran and Syria are are much more militarily advanced nation than they were back in the day.
They can use there VAST land space to great effect, where as israel dont have that many targets that are disposable.
If you lobbed thousands, upon thousnads of missles from iran and syria into israel, you'd make a major % damage to there ability.
compared to bombing Iran and Syria on the same extent, you do minimal damage % wise.
I believe Israel would not sustain an attack from syria and Iran somply due to the population, and the land mass.
Why do so many people believe that current day israel could walk over current day iran syria and lebanon.
Originally posted by spanishcaravan
In the midst of the chaos that this board has become,i ask one question.
Would lebanon be in the mess its in now if they followed the U.N resolution to disband and get rid of hezbollah in the first place?