It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

The true extent of the fire...

page: 1
0

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 29 2003 @ 05:40 PM
link   




posted on Oct, 29 2003 @ 05:42 PM
link   
man, my unclue and some of the people at school dads are there to help...

im in san bruno, SFO is in san bruno

[Edited on 29-10-2003 by Dmsoldier]



posted on Oct, 29 2003 @ 05:46 PM
link   
That's a lot of fires.

Too bad they have no forests in the middle east is all I can say.



posted on Oct, 29 2003 @ 05:54 PM
link   
NO, BUT THEY GOT ALOT OF FORESTS IN CANADA, NEO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



posted on Oct, 29 2003 @ 06:13 PM
link   
Skadi,

Yes so true.

Canada has something like 10% of the worlds forests so yeah I am worried.

Grew up in a forested area so I know how important forests are for economic reasons.



posted on Oct, 29 2003 @ 06:17 PM
link   
Washington state and Oregon both have a #load of forest too. Thats all we have. Lots and Lots of trees everywhere.

However, its also cold and wet here, forest fires on the west side of the Cascade mountains are extremely rare. The occur out east in the dryer high deserts.

I grew up in the Bay Area. I remeber two major wild fries: the oakland hills hfires in 91, and the huge blazes that charred the Santa Cruz mountwains right next to us in 85.



posted on Oct, 29 2003 @ 07:05 PM
link   



new topics




 
0

log in

join