It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Odium
Since day one, they've wanted shared rule of Jerusalem. They've always wanted to have their Heads of State in there. If Israel can't share it, they should hand it over to the United Nation's like it was intended to be.
The problems we have now, were seen and certain "Jewish Terrorist Organisations" never disarmed. So the U.N. never moved in to help control it.
That's what the biggest problem for Muslims is, the rule of Israel over their Holy Sites. Many of them can't ever visit it and those who live there are treated as the second class.
Originally posted by darksided
I think it is pretty clear you have no military experience, none, and you have basically put yourself out there as an instant expert, only for the rest of ATS to learn you are just another opinion who really doesn\'t know what the heck you are talking about.
Originally posted by Odium
There's an easy way to do things and Israel won't do it.
But, it still has a militia that refuses to demilitarise, despite UN resolution 1559, passed in 2004, which called for the disarming of militias as well as the withdrawal of foreign (i.e about 14,000 Syrian) forces from Lebanon.
As long ago as 2000, after Israel's withdrawal, Hezbollah was under pressure to integrate its forces into the Lebanese army and focus on its political and social operations.
“They are a violent terrorist group. And they have demonstrated throughout their now 25-year history a hatred of the United States and a willingness to kill our people.”
Sen. Bob Graham, Florida Democrat
Originally posted by Thompsonite Is it now being suggested that Hezbollah had taken control of the U.N post? Apparently U.N officials were in contact with it right up until the bombing, and they made no mention that Hezbollah had taken over.
Originally posted by jlc163
Counter thought: If Hezies took over and were trying to rile up the general public, would they allow those phone calls to ever mention that they took over...*gun pointing to head while you make your phone call makes for some serious misdirection*....
Personally, I think it's unlikely, since Hezies are more likely to pull what's been going on in Iraq: public beheading....but then, knowing Israel's syle, if they found out something like that would happen, they would consider the missile a mercy killing. Though still possible.
Originally posted by Thompsonite
You have a good point. I shall reserve it as a fair possibility.
Originally posted by jlc163
Counter thought: If Hezies took over and were trying to rile up the general public, would they allow those phone calls to ever mention that they took over...*gun pointing to head while you make your phone call makes for some serious misdirection*....
Originally posted by skippytjc
Here ya go haters:
Yes, thats correct, its a picture of Hezbollah and UN flags next to eachother in Lebanon.
UN = The most corrupt and useless oganization on the planet. Now terrorist collaborators.
GO ISRAEL!
Originally posted by The Observer
Before you ask, no, I am not Jewish, just military experienced and know Israelis. And if someone is shooting at my children, I remove them. Period. And if UN observers happen to be near the source of the rockets, well, sorry.
While the rest of the world is ringing it's hands, and the terorist groups are planning on how to use the hand-ringing to it's own benefit, And to the few of you using the "boycott Israel" thing, thank you. Now I know how to target my consumer dollar. To buy as many Israeli goods as possible.
Originally posted by Thompsonite
Originally posted by darksided
I think it is pretty clear you have no military experience, none, and you have basically put yourself out there as an instant expert, only for the rest of ATS to learn you are just another opinion who really doesn\'t know what the heck you are talking about.
Military experience is not required. All you need here is a little common sense; an area where subz clearly gets the better of you. The U.N workers should have been forced to vacate their post before it was totally destroyed. Bombardments on Hezbollah positions around the post are much more understandable, but a precision guided missile actually on the U.N Post itself? No way. The only time that would be acceptable is if Hezbollah had killed the U.N team and taken control of the compound. Is it now being suggested that Hezbollah had taken control of the U.N post? Apparently U.N officials were in contact with it right up until the bombing, and they made no mention that Hezbollah had taken over.
Originally posted by ThePieMaN
if you are Military experienced as you say, what about the rights of the Palestinians who are innocent and don't strap bombs to themselves?
Originally posted by hogtie
I don't recall anyone saying the UN needed more power. It has never exercised the power that it has, except to further its own corruption. You are right about the actual personel on the ground, and it infuriates me that soveriegn govts allow its soldiers to be commanded by such an organization. One US soldier who refused to serve under a UN flag, because he enlisted to serve the US, was courts martialed. That is in-sane. My recommendation is to dismantle the monolithic, corrupt thing. I mean really; How can you have the Congo, China, and Sudan on the Commission on Human Rights? For the love of Pete! Is it so they can counsel the rest of the commission on what not to do? So tear it down. The only reason I don't advocate the US leaving on its own is because I love our veto. *kiss, kiss, kiss*.
Originally posted by intrepid
The UN saved our species in the past. It gave a voice for discussion between rivals. Now that there's only 1 superpower it's useless, a bane to the U.., er the planet?
The Israeli military doesn't want the UN to see what it's doing? Hmm.
Originally posted by hogtie
Originally posted by intrepid
The UN saved our species in the past. It gave a voice for discussion between rivals. Now that there's only 1 superpower it's useless, a bane to the U.., er the planet?
Yep. That's about the size of it. Except the US never needed the UN. Neither did NATO. Oh, and when you say "only superpower" I assume you mean China.
The Israeli military doesn't want the UN to see what it's doing? Hmm.
Why? What's the UN going to do? Sanction them? Issue a resolution? Which is worse? Besides, why do they need the UN to report to the world what is going on when Hez can just videotape it themselves and transmit over Al Jezera (sp?)? It works for false propiganda and beheadings, why not this? Could it be that they don't want to show videos of themselves smothering neutral parties and civilians for protection?
Originally posted by intrepid
Obfuscation is not very becoming to thinking people.
To the bold I think you've got the extremist parties mixed up here. But if you want to continue to paint ALL opponents with the same brush so that you can sleep OK. The rest of us that think will just move on.