posted on Aug, 9 2006 @ 10:50 AM
Well, as I pointed out earlier, he's already filled in the blanks from the "documentary" so I don't understand… what's the point?
The blanks were filled in within another editorial context. I want a straight interview without an agenda. On this site I think we could isolate Buzz
from the agenda people and just let him tell his perspective without over emphasis of ET or IF from either editorial camp. That's the point.
Buzz thought it was a UFO, NASA though it was an IFO… what part of that didn’t you understand?
The part where Buzz thought it was a UFO. So Buzz thought it was a UFO. That's what I wanted to be clear about.
If it's about the remainder of the Apollo 11 mission, that's already been dealt with here too... it was a hoax.
No, wasn't refering to that. I witnessed a ham radio hoax when I was a kid. People do that all of the time.
If it’s about whether or not Buzz believes UFOs are of ET origin… what’s difference does his or anybody else’s opinion really make?
All the difference in the world. "Officialdom" poo-poos the subject. Says everything is a 'plasma ball', etc. The deliberate de-emphasis of the
inherent legitimacy of sighting unexplained flying objects is one of the most insidious elements of our society. By pointing out that archetypal heros
see unexplained flying objects helps curtail the trend towards ignorance. If the opinion of those archetypes is not the 'plasma' ball line, then
that helps curtail the second indisiousness, which is the labeling of those who hypothesize ET origin as losers with derailed sensibilities.
Any way, I think Buzz's direct thoughts on what the object is IS important because he saw it. He was an eye witness and he has a human brain with an
So can you see why I or anybody else would be reluctant to “pester” the man further?
I can see why. But this topic is about denying ignorance and getting to the truth. It seems the only way to do that is to get more unfiltered
information. Too much editorializing in the UFO world and in the skeptic world. Need more straight interviews without insertions, IMHO. I would still
like to see that unfiltered interview done.
Thanks for the response, Access. I always appreciate your input.
[edit on 9-8-2006 by Ectoterrestrial]