It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Vushta
So far we've gotten.....act like a janitor and stick it on a wall....any wall that you can get to..stick it on a steel beam..any beam that you can get to. And then..Boom..it falls like a perfect demo job.
Sorry, that just in not credible.
Originally posted by Griff
So far we've gotten from your side......act like a passenger and highjack a plane. Crash the plane into a wall...any wall that you can get to.....have an explosion....any explosion will do to weeken the facade and core (note that both plane impacts were very different)...And then...Boom...it falls like a perfect demo job.
Sorry, that just is not credible either.
any wall that you can get to
.have an explosion.
..any explosion will do to weeken the facade and core (note that both plane impacts were very different)
(note that both plane impacts were very different)
Originally posted by DropInABucket
I had not seen referance to this paper as of yet (did a search and suprisingly didn't find this either, but could have goofed ) , so I thought it would post it, to help out with the physics of CD in regards to WTC:
External Link
Though this doesn't say how the explosives were throretically set per se, it does have calculations as to how much explosives would be needed if CD was used.
And before the anti-CD people say it, yes the author of this has been slammed by "Screw Loose Change" as having no credentials via Google search. He is an amature physicist, but this paper has been run by several physics groups and the math has been verified in the few web forums I checked.
So I used his numbers along with some numbers I found on the CDI's Website on the implosion of #500 Wood Street
According to CDI it took 13 people 7days to place 595lbs of explosives.
595 / 13 / 7 == 6.5lbs per person per workday
According to Mr. Trumpman it would take approx 1.4 tons of explosives (HMX) to bring down WTC1. If using the CDI's work per day as a benchmark, and using a team of 20 people:
2800 / 20 / 6.5 == 21.5 workdays (if pre-weakend, approx. x2 if not pre-weakened)
I would consider that plausible IMO as long as security was bypassed (I know that this is the main question of this thread).
Not 100% on-topic I will admit, but at least this throws some numbers into the mix to show that it wouldn't take an army nor a year to set this up. 40 people and 2 months could have been all that it took to set the charges, unless I'm off on my math.
Originally posted by alienanderson
Wikipedia make it sound simple Vushta...
wikipedia
A building takes several weeks to be prepared for implosion
Selected columns are drilled and nitroglycerin and TNT are placed in the holes
Smaller columns and walls are wrapped in explosive cables
The goal is to use as few explosives as possible, and only a few floors are rigged with explosives
The areas with explosive are covered in thick plastic and fencing to absorb flying debris
Originally posted by Barcs
Vush, please don't ignore my post. We're not saying that 9/11 was an inside job. We're saying that it wasn't impossible to set up. It has nothing to do with what people saw on TV. Obviously we didn't see a bunch of dudes on TV planting explosives in the towers. We ALSO didn't see what exactly happened on those planes. You're trying to say it's completely impossible for one of the most powerful governments in the world to demolish a building without people noticing?
[edit on 24-7-2006 by Barcs]
You're trying to say it's completely impossible for one of the most powerful governments in the world to demolish a building without people noticing?
Originally posted by Griff
That's 3 workers doing the job in 3 days (if they can place them in a days work). As far as ignition....use magnesium strips to initiate heat on a timer. You'll say ..."but magnesium is unreliable"...and I'll say..."it didn't have to be 100% for it to work"...and..."That's why I think the core in building 1 stood for a second before completely cascading down into itself".
That's a very easy way to have only 3 people in the know, plus the higher ups, doing it in 3 or a few more days.
Originally posted by Vushta
So by your own discription...how was all that done with no one noticing?
Originally posted by Vushta
If you factor this into the time need it either goes up in factors of magnitude, or fall in the hole where I believe it actually resides and thats the hole of unbelievability because it simply cannot be done covertly.
I'm not saying it was a CD - but I am not saying it could not possibly have been one
Saying that they are incapable of pulling off an operation like that seems very silly to me.
Saying that they are incapable of pulling off an operation like that seems very silly to me.
Saying that they are incapable of pulling off an operation like that seems very silly to me.
Originally posted by aecreate
I think if anyone cannot possibly imagine how the Gov't and its vast resources and compartmentalized nature rigged those buildings or accept that there's some% chance its possible, is not being reasonable. It's like talking to a wall, or a brick in the wall, or wait, a tree that doesn't bend...
Second day of work....claim maintenance in the core via one of the elevators. Place the devices on all structural columns in the core at this elevation (approximately between the first 1/3 of the building to the 2/3 point).
Originally posted by zappafan1
At the very least every other floor would have to be done for a CD
howstuffworks.com
Generally speaking, blasters will explode the major support columns on the lower floors first and then a few upper stories.
In a 20-story building, for example, the blasters might blow the columns on the first and second floor, as well as the 12th and 15th floors.
In most cases, blowing the support structures on the lower floors is sufficient for collapsing the building, but loading columns on upper floors helps break the building material into smaller pieces as it falls. This makes for easier clean-up following the blast.
posted by alienanderson:
Is that a guess?
Generally speaking, blasters will explode the major support columns on the lower floors first and then a few upper stories.
Originally posted by Vushta
Originally posted by DropInABucket
I had not seen referance to this paper as of yet (did a search and suprisingly didn't find this either, but could have goofed ) , so I thought it would post it, to help out with the physics of CD in regards to WTC:
External Link
Though this doesn't say how the explosives were throretically set per se, it does have calculations as to how much explosives would be needed if CD was used.
And before the anti-CD people say it, yes the author of this has been slammed by "Screw Loose Change" as having no credentials via Google search. He is an amature physicist, but this paper has been run by several physics groups and the math has been verified in the few web forums I checked.
So I used his numbers along with some numbers I found on the CDI's Website on the implosion of #500 Wood Street
According to CDI it took 13 people 7days to place 595lbs of explosives.
595 / 13 / 7 == 6.5lbs per person per workday
According to Mr. Trumpman it would take approx 1.4 tons of explosives (HMX) to bring down WTC1. If using the CDI's work per day as a benchmark, and using a team of 20 people:
2800 / 20 / 6.5 == 21.5 workdays (if pre-weakend, approx. x2 if not pre-weakened)
I would consider that plausible IMO as long as security was bypassed (I know that this is the main question of this thread).
Not 100% on-topic I will admit, but at least this throws some numbers into the mix to show that it wouldn't take an army nor a year to set this up. 40 people and 2 months could have been all that it took to set the charges, unless I'm off on my math.
Thanks for that effort DIAB, it gives some perspective for above the board time needed.
The major problem still remains though. How was it done with no one noticing? This iis no small point.
The time factor you gave were for full crews working completely in the open with a full ragne of equipment from cutting torches..equipment to rapidly strip walls of their sheathing and bobcats running around inside the building to move debris etc. If you factor this into the time need it either goes up in factors of magnitude, or fall in the hole where I believe it actually resides and thats the hole of unbelievability because it simply cannot be done covertly.