original quote by: Vushta
How were the WTC buildings rigged with explosives?
Maybe Marvin Bush, whos company handled security for the building had something to do with it... Why is it Bushes name is everywhere on this yet people do not place it. Bush had long time dealings with the Bin Ladens stemming from Bushs first oil company Arbusto Energy. Bush's brother's comapny handled security for the buildings. Silverstien says "pull it" at about 5:30 and then the building comes down. Of course there were no firefighters in the building 7 since about 11:30 AM that morning.
here is an interesting link that illustrates Marvin Bush's role...
Marvin Bush
Washington, D.C. WASHINGTON, Jan 19, 2003 -- A company that provided security at New York City's World Trade Center, Dulles International Airport in Washington, D.C., and to United Airlines between 1995 and 2001, was backed by a private Kuwaiti-American investment firm with ties to a brother of President Bush and the Bush family, according to records obtained by the American Reporter.
Two planes hijacked on Sept. 11, 2001 were United Airlines planes, and another took off from Dulles International Airport; two, of course, slammed into the World Trade Center. But the Bush Administration has never disclosed the ties of a presidential brother and the Bush family with the firm that intersected the weapons and targets on a day of national tragedy.
Marvin P. Bush, a younger brother of George W. Bush, was a principal in the company from 1993 to 2000, when most of the work on the big projects was done. But White House responses to 9/11 have not publicly disclosed the company's part in providing security to any of the named facilities, and many of the public records revealing the relationships are not public
see rest of story here
The placing of explosives couldve been done through "renovation work" or installed when the buildings were being built in the first place. The arguement that The biuldings coul not have been rigged that day are absolutely correct. It does take time to rig a building for demolition. Unfortunately, most of the people that could attest to seeing anything going on like this are DEAD! How convienient.
Also, Silverstein's comments are the one of the most singular damning statements that have come out yet.
There is also a list of witnesses that has been willfully ignored by the MSM and the 911 Commision.
eyewitness reports-from Rense.com
Also, a side note. One would not have to rig the entire building to have it come down in a specific way.. there need only be strategic placements of the explosives/thermite and a catalyst(planes)
Also another site that raises some good points is listed below.
renewamerica.us
original quote by: Vushta
So here's the question.
Knowing what is known about CDs and the process and steps that MUST be taken in order for a CD to take place, how was it done without raising suspicion?
If there were "renovations" being done in any of the buildings prior to 911(whether it be weeks or months or even years before 911) Then most people wouldnt think twice about it. And unless you were an explosives expert how would you notice exactly what they were installing into the buildings? It couldve been done slowly over time to allay that very concern of "people noticing".
Considering "Project Northwoods" has been in existance for the better part of 50 years it is not like there wasnt enough time to make these arrangements. There was a few decades. Just because some of us dont think ahead 20 or 30 years does not mean that people wth power and a plan, share in that same mindset. Of course all this would be frickin MOOT if our govt. didnt haul off all the evidence so damned fast. Now all that people who are trying to find out the truth have is circumstantial evidence. And the Govt. investigates itself....brilliant plan. all nice and neat and tidy.. they have but one enemy left... the truth!
[edit on 23-7-2006 by TONE23]
