Originally posted by Swampfox46_1999
You are making the false assumption that pulling referred to controlled demolition, it does not. What they were speaking of was the fire company that was making preliminary steps into WTC 7. Pull it, meant pull the fire company out of the building. Nothing more, nothing less.
WTC 7 was a mess, widespread fires on multiple floors, not to mention the 20 story chunk that was taken out of it by the collapse of the tower. But dont believe me...believe them...
Captain Chris Boyle
Engine 94 - 18 years
Boyle: ... on the north and east side of 7 it didn't look like there was any damage at all, but then you looked on the south side of 7 there had to be a hole 20 stories tall in the building, with fire on several floors. Debris was falling down on the building and it didn't look good.
Deputy Chief Peter Hayden
Division 1 - 33 years
Hayden: No, not right away, and that's probably why it stood for so long because it took a while for that fire to develop. It was a heavy body of fire in there and then we didn't make any attempt to fight it. That was just one of those wars we were just going to lose. We were concerned about the collapse of a 47-story building there. We were worried about additional collapse there of what was remaining standing of the towers and the Marriott, so we started pulling the people back after a couple of hours of surface removal and searches along the surface of the debris. We started to pull guys back because we were concerned for their safety.
"at the edge of the south face you could see that it was very heavily damaged. ... until you had done either a couple of 360s around this whole site or if you got an aerial view somehow, you really couldn’t appreciate the scope of the damage." - Battalion Chief John Norman
Special Operations Command - 22 years
since you're using eyewitness accounts allow me to use mine...
“[T]here was just an explosion [in the south tower]. It seemed like on television [when] they blow up these buildings. It seemed like it was going all the way around like a belt, all these explosions.”--Firefighter Richard Banaciski
“I saw a flash flash flash [at] the lower level of the building. You know like when they demolish a building?”--Assistant Fire Commissioner Stephen Gregory
“[I]t was [like a] professional demolition where they set the charges on certain floors and then you hear 'Pop, pop, pop, pop, pop'."--Paramedic Daniel Rivera
and you can verify those accounts
I will say however, that according to the first firefighters testimony, that he said they were "pulled" from the Verizon building. He also said that he saw one bottom corner of building 7 gone. I'd like to know which corner that was. He was in the Verizon building, anyone know where that is in relation to WTC 7?
I lean heavily towards controlled demolition, but i find the other theory to be plausible as well, just less so. I know 9/11 was an inside job from extensive research on the subject and our gov'ts past actions in regards to conspiracy (see Gulf of Tonkin, Watergate, October Suprise, Iran-Contra, Iraqgate, CIA coup in Iran, campaign contributions from Ferdinan Marcos, Republican deals with the Vietnamese to not end the war until after elections, Operation Northwoods, etc)
People that find the US gov't incapable of being complicit in the 9/11 terror attacks simply don't know their history, are working for the gov't for psyops, or are the gov't themselves. Watch out for disinfo on the Truth side as well. They deployed those tactics in the October Surprise