It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Pensylvannia incredible ufo footage

page: 1
0

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 19 2006 @ 06:42 PM
link   
Here's a video taken from a cessna with ufo's disappearing in mid air and under water. IMHO I think it's an excellent vid. Forgive me if it has been posted before, but in my search on ATS i didn't find it. Folks let me know what you think.

www.eyepod.org...




posted on Jul, 19 2006 @ 06:55 PM
link   
Shocking footage, grainy, pixelated, jumpy. The water shots could be absolutly anything at all. The out the window midair shots are intresting but the motion seems directly proportionate to the movement/pov of the camera, but if it was anything it might be a white bird, becoming visible as it levels out, dissappearing as it banks and its back/wings become apparent.
The camera person changes filter to dark further obscuring whatever was moving on the ground. Sorry its not even good by enthusiasts standards.



posted on Jul, 19 2006 @ 06:59 PM
link   
First clip looks fairly good, nice matching of artifacts, nice matchmove throughout all clips. I wonder if this is THE John Foster, the Adobe After Effects specialist? If so it´s perfectly ok to start out sceptic about this, that guy has loads of humor and he is a VERY skilled AE artist and one of my "heroes" as far as compositing/broadcast graphics go


(I should add it´s been a long time since i frequented the www.dvgarage.com board were he was a regular, just browsed by it and it seems pretty slow. Last post by John was made in 2004 and he resided in SF at the time. Probably not the same guy...)

[edit on 19-7-2006 by tomra]



posted on Jul, 19 2006 @ 07:03 PM
link   
nice try at debunking, but you gotta keep honing in your debunking skills.



posted on Jul, 19 2006 @ 07:13 PM
link   
I might have missed it, but where did this clip say it was shot in Pennsylvania? I would be interested to know where exactly, as I am a resident of PA and am somewhat familiar with all areas of the state.



posted on Jul, 19 2006 @ 07:20 PM
link   

Originally posted by UnBreakable
I might have missed it, but where did this clip say it was shot in Pennsylvania? I would be interested to know where exactly, as I am a resident of PA and am somewhat familiar with all areas of the state.


At the bginning of the vid it says "Pensylvannia ufo incident" so i don't know what part of pennsylvania it was shot in.



posted on Jul, 19 2006 @ 07:36 PM
link   
Hard to judge the validity of the clip as I am no expert with film technology (photoshop, cgi, etc) but the UFO over/under the water looks believable.

Here's another clip, over water:

www.waterufo.net...



posted on Jul, 19 2006 @ 07:57 PM
link   
The overall quality is bad to begin with. The poster wants to see UFOs and more than implies this anomolie is other wordly. "The craft enters the Visable Spectrum" Really now.

Nothing in the begining there that could not be rationaly explained. Looking out the planes cabin window someone turns on a light inside the cabin. The camera motion makes it appear to move about. It doesn't take a light. A simple reflection of an interior item sufices to explain the rest of the poor imagery. So I'll reflect a glint of light off my watch and this UFO chaser will follow it just the same.

Sorry just another line of videos showing indiscernable specs or blobs withing poor footage.


[edit on 19-7-2006 by nullster]



posted on Jul, 19 2006 @ 07:59 PM
link   

Originally posted by nullster
The overall quality is bad to begin with. The poster wants to see UFOs and more than implies this anomolie is other wordly.
OK. Nothing in the begining there that could not be rationaly explained. Looking out the planes cabin window someone turns on a light inside the cabin. The camera motion makes it appear to move about.

Sorry just another line of videos showing indiscernable specs or blobs withing poor footage.

NO i'm sorry that you feel that way, it's too easy for you.



posted on Jul, 19 2006 @ 11:31 PM
link   
The first "UFO" is strange, specially the movements. But it could be internal light reflection, yes. But it's not conclusive for me.

The second part, the first "UFO" over the lake, it's better. If you see it's actually moving, taking references on ground. But in the other hand, there's not "magnificent" movement behavior. And the good one: the shape is almost exact with the first "disappearing" UFO, so maybe the first one isn't a reflection at all (this, over the water, don't seem to be a reflection)

The third one, over the water too... well... too poor quality.

And the final formation, and the close zoom, strange indeed, but poor quality again.

All this if the footage is genuine, of course



new topics

top topics



 
0

log in

join