It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by El Che
what haphazardly mean sorry to ask.
adv 1: in a random manner; "the houses were randomly scattered"; "bullets were fired into the crowd at random" [syn: randomly, indiscriminately, willy-nilly, arbitrarily, at random, every which way] 2: without care; in a slapdash manner; "the Prime Minister was wearing a gray suit and a white shirt with a soft collar, but his neck had become thinner and the collar stood away from it as if it had been bought haphazard" [syn: haphazard]
posted by benevolent tyrant
“ . . neither Iran or Israel should have "the Bomb" . . to answer this question I would have to answer "none of the above" I think that, of the two choices, Israel can have the bomb because, unlike Iran, they have not gone on record making rash and ignorant statements about destroying anyone . . “ [Edited by Don W]
Iran's very public expression of intended violence does not impress me as being diplomatic or responsible. Iran does not inspire confidence they could control their A-bomb. After all, Iran has already expressed their malicious intent and desire to use the A Bomb against Israel . .
Originally posted by djohnsto77
How about because we can trust Israel to not use them haphazardly while we can't trust Iran?
Just listen to the recent statements of Iran's president and the answer should be clear!
Originally posted by jensy
I am a supporter of Israel and believe that they have aright to nuclear weapons, however the last thing I want is an idiot like the author of this post defended said right. I believe that Nuclear weapons were perhaps the biggest mistake anyone has ever made and will foreved leave a shadow over our planet. However for small country such as Israel which has nearby countires calling for its complete destruction they are vital as a bargaining tool.